Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Total
6243 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-5010 | 4 Debian, Opensuse, Python and 1 more | 7 Debian Linux, Leap, Python and 4 more | 2026-10-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the X509 certificate parser of Python.org Python 2.7.11 / 3.6.6. A specially crafted X509 certificate can cause a NULL pointer dereference, resulting in a denial of service. An attacker can initiate or accept TLS connections using crafted certificates to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-17267 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 13 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Active Iq Unified Manager and 10 more | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to net.sf.ehcache.hibernate.EhcacheJtaTransactionManagerLookup. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14647 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 5 more | 2026-10-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Python's elementtree C accelerator failed to initialise Expat's hash salt during initialization. This could make it easy to conduct denial of service attacks against Expat by constructing an XML document that would cause pathological hash collisions in Expat's internal data structures, consuming large amounts CPU and RAM. The vulnerability exists in Python versions 3.7.0, 3.6.0 through 3.6.6, 3.5.0 through 3.5.6, 3.4.0 through 3.4.9, 2.7.0 through 2.7.15. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12149 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnlyAccessFilter of the HTTP Invoker does not restrict classes for which it performs deserialization and thus allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18074 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18095 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.5 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18114 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper path canonicalization. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18123 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18124 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18131 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18132 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18133 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify server files due to path traversal. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18134 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2026-81658 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 2 Satellite, Foreman | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The template revision endpoint does not enforce object-level authorization when retrieving an audited template revision. An authenticated, low privileged user with a template-related permission, such as view_ptables, can obtain historical template contents belonging to another organization or location by supplying the corresponding audit ID. This can result in unauthorized disclosure of historical template contents, which may contain sensitive configuration information, credentials, or other secrets. The REST API revision endpoints correctly restrict this lookup. | |||||
| CVE-2026-90996 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 3 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in sssd. A local unprivileged user could send a specially crafted request with a zero-length body to the Network Security Services (NSS) responder. This could lead to a denial-of-service condition, causing the NSS responder to become unstable or terminate. This vulnerability affects the availability of the system responder. | |||||
| CVE-2026-90462 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 3 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in SSSD. When configured with the LDAP access provider and `ldap_access_order` including `ppolicy` or `lockout`, a fail-open condition in the LDAP ppolicy access check can occur if a user lookup returns zero results. This can incorrectly return success and cache an allow decision, permitting continued authorization for a deleted or deprovisioned user. A remote attacker with prior valid account context could exploit this to maintain access to information and potentially make limited modifications to resources that should no longer be available. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18176 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18173 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper enforcement of mutual TLS authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18172 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18137 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary ESQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an ESQL command. | |||||