Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Total
6243 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18177 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized payment actions due to missing authorization checks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18179 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to clear active chat sessions due to improper authorization. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18180 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to SQL injection. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18181 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and access sensitive information due to a hard-coded cryptographic key. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18184 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18185 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information and modify system configurations due to missing authentication for a critical function. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18490 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via Java native deserialization on the PayDir Business Rules Manager RMI SSL endpoint (BrmRMISSLServerSocketFactory.java:95, EP8). An adjacent-network attacker can deliver a crafted serialized payload to achieve arbitrary code execution, exposing all PayDir credentials and enabling manipulation of payment business rules. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18505 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to open redirect in the PMP `HostHeaderFilter` (`HostHeaderFilter.java:151`). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a request with a manipulated `Host` header to redirect authenticated operators to attacker-controlled sites, enabling credential phishing. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18872 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 9.3 CRITICAL |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in the FTM UI NetworkAcknowledgement React component (NetworkAcknowledgement.jsx:42). A malicious actor can inject script into stored network acknowledgement data that executes in authenticated operator browsers, enabling session hijacking and unauthorized operator-level payment actions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18875 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to RAG poisoning via unauthenticated runbook upsert (CWE-74) in the FTM AI agent server (api.vectordb.runbooks.js:51). An unauthenticated attacker can insert malicious runbook content into the agent's vector database to steer AI-driven MCP tool calls, potentially triggering unauthorized payment actions or exfiltrating payment data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-19087 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation within the container due to improper privilege management. | |||||
| CVE-2026-19179 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to manipulate database queries due to improper neutralization of special elements in a boolean expression. | |||||
| CVE-2026-19267 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-07 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to missing authentication on the Business Rules Manager commands REST endpoint (`CommandsResource.java:31`). A local actor can invoke unauthenticated commands to cause resource exhaustionand halt business-rule management functions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18161 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to falsify transaction audit logs due to improper validation of a client-supplied HTTP header. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18162 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input within the new Function constructor. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18163 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper deserialization of untrusted data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18169 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of symbolic links. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18170 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to allocation of resources without limits or throttling. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2575 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Of Keycloak | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger an application level Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a highly compressed SAMLRequest through the SAML Redirect Binding. The server fails to enforce size limits during DEFLATE decompression, leading to an OutOfMemoryError (OOM) and subsequent process termination. This vulnerability allows an attacker to disrupt the availability of the service. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2092 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Of Keycloak | 2026-10-06 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. Keycloak's Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) broker endpoint does not properly validate encrypted assertions when the overall SAML response is not signed. An attacker with a valid signed SAML assertion can exploit this by crafting a malicious SAML response. This allows the attacker to inject an encrypted assertion for an arbitrary principal, leading to unauthorized access and potential information disclosure. | |||||