Total
73 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-22051 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-10-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.9.0.13 and 12.0.0.6 are susceptible to a Information Disclosure vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to run arbitrary metrics queries, revealing metric results that they do not have access to. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37434 | 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 21 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 18 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications that call inflateGetHeader are affected. Some common applications bundle the affected zlib source code but may be unable to call inflateGetHeader (e.g., see the nodejs/node reference). | |||||
| CVE-2022-0778 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Mariadb and 4 more | 15 Debian Linux, Fedora, Mariadb and 12 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 12 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 9 more | 167 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 164 more | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3450 | 10 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 7 more | 35 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 32 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 11 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 8 more | 40 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 37 more | 2026-08-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26517 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 are susceptible to a privilege escalation vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an unauthorized authenticated attacker to discover Grid node names and IP addresses or modify Storage Grades. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26516 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 are susceptible to a Denial of Service vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service on the Admin node. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26515 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 without Single Sign-on enabled are susceptible to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change the password of any Grid Manager or Tenant Manager non-federated user. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26514 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8.0.15 and 11.9.0.8 are susceptible to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an attacker to view or modify configuration settings or add or modify user accounts but requires the attacker to know specific information about the target instance and then trick a privileged user into clicking a specially crafted link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25292 | 3 Netapp, Omniauth, Onelogin | 3 Storagegrid, Omniauth Saml, Ruby-saml | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently, the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 contain a patch for the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25291 | 3 Netapp, Omniauth, Onelogin | 3 Storagegrid, Omniauth Saml, Ruby-saml | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently; the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 fix the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-21994 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.9 are susceptible to a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. Successful exploit by an authenticated attacker could lead to a service crash. | |||||
| CVE-2024-21988 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.7.0.9 and 11.8.0.5 are susceptible to disclosure of sensitive information via complex MiTM attacks due to a vulnerability in the SSH cryptographic implementation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-21984 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8 are susceptible to a difficult to exploit Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Successful exploit requires the attacker to know specific information about the target instance and trick a privileged user into clicking a specially crafted link. This could allow the attacker to view or modify configuration settings or add or modify user accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-21983 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.8 are susceptible to a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. Successful exploit by an authenticated attacker could lead to an out of memory condition or node reboot. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27318 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions 11.6.0 through 11.6.0.13 are susceptible to a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. A successful exploit could lead to a crash of the Local Distribution Router (LDR) service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38734 | 1 Netapp | 1 Storagegrid | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.6.0.8 are susceptible to a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. A successful exploit could lead to to a crash of the Local Distribution Router (LDR) service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23806 | 3 Debian, Golang, Netapp | 6 Debian Linux, Go, Beegfs Csi Driver and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Curve.IsOnCurve in crypto/elliptic in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 can incorrectly return true in situations with a big.Int value that is not a valid field element. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23773 | 2 Golang, Netapp | 5 Go, Beegfs Csi Driver, Cloud Insights Telegraf Agent and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| cmd/go in Go before 1.16.14 and 1.17.x before 1.17.7 can misinterpret branch names that falsely appear to be version tags. This can lead to incorrect access control if an actor is supposed to be able to create branches but not tags. | |||||