Filtered by vendor Mcafee
Subscribe
Total
605 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-9169 | 4 Canonical, Gnu, Mcafee and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Glibc, Web Gateway and 3 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive regular-expression match. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16168 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 20 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 17 more | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner." | |||||
| CVE-2019-13057 | 7 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 4 more | 9 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 6 more | 2026-10-14 | 3.5 LOW | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) | |||||
| CVE-2004-0230 | 7 Juniper, Mcafee, Microsoft and 4 more | 12 Junos, Network Data Loss Prevention, Windows 2000 and 9 more | 2026-10-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| TCP, when using a large Window Size, makes it easier for remote attackers to guess sequence numbers and cause a denial of service (connection loss) to persistent TCP connections by repeatedly injecting a TCP RST packet, especially in protocols that use long-lived connections, such as BGP. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 12 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 9 more | 167 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 164 more | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-33037 | 4 Apache, Debian, Mcafee and 1 more | 22 Tomcat, Tomee, Debian Linux and 19 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3450 | 10 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 7 more | 35 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 32 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2020-9484 | 7 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 4 more | 26 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 23 more | 2026-10-08 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13935 | 7 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 4 more | 18 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 15 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4472 | 4 Canonical, Libexpat Project, Mcafee and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Libexpat, Policy Auditor and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The overflow protection in Expat is removed by compilers with certain optimization settings, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted XML data. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-1283 and CVE-2015-2716. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0718 | 9 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 14 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 11 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Expat allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a malformed input document, which triggers a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2016-20050 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Netschedscan | 2026-07-20 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| NetSchedScan 1.0 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the scan Hostname/IP field that allows local attackers to crash the application by supplying an oversized input string. Attackers can paste a crafted payload containing 388 bytes of data followed by 4 bytes of EIP overwrite into the Hostname/IP field to trigger a denial of service condition. | |||||
| CVE-2024-25254 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Superscan | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| SuperScan v4.1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the Hostname/IP parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5445 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Epolicy Orchestrator | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An open redirect vulnerability in ePolicy Orchestrator prior to 5.10.0 CP1 Update 2, allows a remote low privileged user to modify the URL parameter for the purpose of redirecting URL request(s) to a malicious site. This impacts the dashboard area of the user interface. A user would need to be logged into ePO to trigger this vulnerability. To exploit this the attacker must change the HTTP payload post submission, prior to it reaching the ePO server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5444 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Epolicy Orchestrator | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| A Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ePolicy Orchestrator prior to 5.10.0 CP1 Update 2 allows a remote low privilege user to successfully add a new user with administrator privileges to the ePO server. This impacts the dashboard area of the user interface. To exploit this the attacker must change the HTTP payload post submission, prior to it reaching the ePO server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40352 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Safe Connect | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| McAfee Safe Connect before 2.16.1.126 may allow an adversary with system privileges to achieve privilege escalation by loading arbitrary DLLs. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3946 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Epolicy Orchestrator | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ePO prior to 5.10 SP1 Update 1allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially obtain access to an ePO administrator's session by convincing the authenticated ePO administrator to click on a carefully crafted link. This would lead to limited access to sensitive information and limited ability to alter some information in ePO. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25134 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Total Protection | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| McAfee Total Protection prior to 16.0.50 may allow an adversary (with full administrative access) to modify a McAfee specific Component Object Model (COM) in the Windows Registry. This can result in the loading of a malicious payload. | |||||
| CVE-2023-24579 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Total Protection | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| McAfee Total Protection prior to 16.0.51 allows attackers to trick a victim into uninstalling the application via the command prompt. | |||||
| CVE-2023-24578 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Total Protection | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| McAfee Total Protection prior to 16.0.49 allows attackers to elevate user privileges due to DLL sideloading. This could enable a user with lower privileges to execute unauthorized tasks. | |||||