Total
69 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-5786 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The wsdl_first_https sample code in distribution/src/main/release/samples/wsdl_first_https/src/main/ in Apache CXF before 2.7.0 does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. NOTE: The vendor states that the sample had specifically used a flag to bypass the DN check | |||||
| CVE-2012-5633 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5575 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more | 2026-06-16 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.5.x before 2.5.10, 2.6.x before CXF 2.6.7, and 2.7.x before CXF 2.7.4 does not verify that a specified cryptographic algorithm is allowed by the WS-SecurityPolicy AlgorithmSuite definition before decrypting, which allows remote attackers to force CXF to use weaker cryptographic algorithms than intended and makes it easier to decrypt communications, aka "XML Encryption backwards compatibility attack." | |||||
| CVE-2012-3451 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache CXF before 2.4.9, 2.5.x before 2.5.5, and 2.6.x before 2.6.2 allows remote attackers to execute unintended web-service operations by sending a header with a SOAP Action String that is inconsistent with the message body. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2379 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, when a Supporting Token specifies a child WS-SecurityPolicy 1.1 or 1.2 policy, does not properly ensure that an XML element is signed or encrypted, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-2378 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.4.5 through 2.4.7, 2.5.1 through 2.5.3, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, does not properly enforce child policies of a WS-SecurityPolicy 1.1 SupportingToken policy on the client side, which allows remote attackers to bypass the (1) AlgorithmSuite, (2) SignedParts, (3) SignedElements, (4) EncryptedParts, and (5) EncryptedElements policies. | |||||
| CVE-2012-0803 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The WS-SP UsernameToken policy in Apache CXF 2.4.5 and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending an empty UsernameToken as part of a SOAP request. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2487 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 10 Cxf, Wss4j, Jboss Business Rules Management System and 7 more | 2026-06-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The implementations of PKCS#1 v1.5 key transport mechanism for XMLEncryption in JBossWS and Apache WSS4J before 1.6.5 is susceptible to a Bleichenbacher attack. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2076 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2026-06-16 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Apache CXF 2.0.x before 2.0.13, 2.1.x before 2.1.10, and 2.2.x before 2.2.9, as used in Apache ServiceMix, Apache Camel, Apache Chemistry, Apache jUDDI, Apache Geronimo, and other products, does not properly reject DTDs in SOAP messages, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files, send HTTP requests to intranet servers, or cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a crafted DTD, as demonstrated by an entity declaration in a request to samples/wsdl_first_pure_xml, a similar issue to CVE-2010-1632. | |||||