Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Total
6243 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3135 | 4 Debian, Isc, Netapp and 1 more | 10 Debian Linux, Bind, Data Ontap Edge and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Under some conditions when using both DNS64 and RPZ to rewrite query responses, query processing can resume in an inconsistent state leading to either an INSIST assertion failure or an attempt to read through a NULL pointer. Affects BIND 9.8.8, 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.9.9-S7, 9.9.3 -> 9.9.9-P5, 9.9.10b1, 9.10.0 -> 9.10.4-P5, 9.10.5b1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.0-P2, 9.11.1b1. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3114 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 10 Flash Player, Macos, Chrome Os and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Flash Player 27.0.0.183 and earlier versions. This vulnerability occurs as a result of a computation that reads data that is past the end of the target buffer; the computation is part of providing language- and region- or country- specific functionality. The use of an invalid (out-of-range) pointer offset during access of internal data structure fields causes the vulnerability. A successful attack can lead to sensitive data exposure. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3112 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 10 Flash Player, Macos, Chrome Os and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Adobe Flash Player 27.0.0.183 and earlier versions. This vulnerability occurs as a result of a computation that reads data that is past the end of the target buffer; the computation is part of AdobePSDK metadata. The use of an invalid (out-of-range) pointer offset during access of internal data structure fields causes the vulnerability. A successful attack can lead to sensitive data exposure. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3106 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 26.0.0.137 and earlier have an exploitable type confusion vulnerability when parsing SWF files. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3085 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 26.0.0.137 and earlier have a security bypass vulnerability that leads to information disclosure when performing URL redirect. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3074 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the Graphics class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3073 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability when handling multiple mask properties of display objects, aka memory corruption. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3072 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the BitmapData class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3071 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable use after free vulnerability when masking display objects. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3070 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the ConvolutionFilter class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3069 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the BlendMode class. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3068 | 6 Adobe, Apple, Google and 3 more | 11 Flash Player, Flash Player Desktop Runtime, Mac Os X and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 25.0.0.148 and earlier have an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the Advanced Video Coding engine. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2885 | 3 Debian, Gnome, Redhat | 8 Debian Linux, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An exploitable stack based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the GNOME libsoup 2.58. A specially crafted HTTP request can cause a stack overflow resulting in remote code execution. An attacker can send a special HTTP request to the vulnerable server to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2674 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Bpm Suite | 2026-06-17 | 3.5 LOW | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| JBoss BRMS 6 and BPM Suite 6 before 6.4.3 are vulnerable to a stored XSS via several lists in Business Central. The flaw is due to lack of sanitation of user input when creating new lists. Remote, authenticated attackers that have privileges to create lists can store scripts in them, which are not properly sanitized before showing to other users, including admins. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2673 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openstack | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| An authorization-check flaw was discovered in federation configurations of the OpenStack Identity service (keystone). An authenticated federated user could request permissions to a project and unintentionally be granted all related roles including administrative roles. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2672 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 2 Satellite, Foreman | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in foreman before version 1.15 in the logging of adding and registering images. An attacker with access to the foreman log file would be able to view passwords for provisioned systems in the log file, allowing them to access those systems. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2670 | 2 Debian, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| It was found in Undertow before 1.3.28 that with non-clean TCP close, the Websocket server gets into infinite loop on every IO thread, effectively causing DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2668 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 4 389 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Server and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| 389-ds-base before versions 1.3.5.17 and 1.3.6.10 is vulnerable to an invalid pointer dereference in the way LDAP bind requests are handled. A remote unauthenticated attacker could use this flaw to make ns-slapd crash via a specially crafted LDAP bind request, resulting in denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2667 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Hammer Cli | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Hammer CLI, a CLI utility for Foreman, before version 0.10.0, did not explicitly set the verify_ssl flag for apipie-bindings that disable it by default. As a result the server certificates are not checked and connections are prone to man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2666 | 2 Debian, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered in Undertow that the code that parsed the HTTP request line permitted invalid characters. This could be exploited, in conjunction with a proxy that also permitted the invalid characters but with a different interpretation, to inject data into the HTTP response. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from requests other than their own. | |||||