Total
965 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-108971 | 2026-10-14 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| A flaw has been found in D-Link DCS-930L B1.08B4. This impacts the function mpfd_decode of the file bootloader_region.bin of the component Emergency HTTP Recovery Server. Executing a manipulation of the argument firmware can lead to improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-71422 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM | ||
| Contrast is a Kubernetes runtime for confidential containers. In versions before 1.12.1, the secure persistent volume feature is vulnerable to a malicious host supplying a crafted LUKS2 volume to a pod VM. LUKS2 volume metadata is not authenticated and, with cryptsetup versions prior to 2.8.1, a header specifying the null keyslot encryption algorithm (cipher_null-ecb) is accepted without error. Because the Contrast Initializer assumes a device is protected if `cryptsetup open` succeeds with the secret seed, the guest will open the attacker-supplied volume and write secret data in plaintext, or under a volume key known to the attacker, allowing the host to read confidential data that should have been encrypted. Contrast v1.12.1 ships cryptsetup 2.8.1, which disables null ciphers in keyslots when the passphrase is non-empty; v1.13.0 adds detached-header validation in guest memory and integrity protection for secure persistent storage. Contrast persistent volumes were not integrity protected, so integrity impact is not considered. | |||||
| CVE-2025-41669 | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The Web-based Management allows a remote low privileged Engineer user to install additional APPs on the device downloaded from the PLCnext Store without implementing any data verification mechanism, leading to the capability for an Engineer user to reach arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the PLC device. A successful exploitation may allow to install a manipulated APP package, potentially impacting integrity and availability of the PLCnext Control. | |||||
| CVE-2026-107722 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. From 6.2.0 until 6.3.0, fast-jwt can misclassify RSA public-key text as an HMAC secret when the key has non-whitespace content before its PEM header. In src/crypto.js, performDetectPublicKeyAlgorithms trims whitespace but publicKeyPemMatcher remains start-anchored, so comments, control characters, zero-width characters, or wrapper text can prevent PEM detection and reach the HMAC fallback. An attacker who knows the public key bytes can sign arbitrary HS256 claims with that public material when HS256 is inferred or allowed, resulting in authentication or authorization bypass. An asymmetric-only algorithm allowlist prevents the attack. This issue is fixed in version 6.3.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-68972 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Gnupg | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In GnuPG through 2.4.8, if a signed message has \f at the end of a plaintext line, an adversary can construct a modified message that places additional text after the signed material, such that signature verification of the modified message succeeds (although an "invalid armor" message is printed during verification). This is related to use of \f as a marker to denote truncation of a long plaintext line. | |||||
| CVE-2026-86405 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in Sipay Electronic Money and Payment Services Inc. PrestaShop Virtual POS Module allows Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation. This issue affects PrestaShop Virtual POS Module: from 26.8.1 before 26.9.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-85531 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in Sipay Electronic Money and Payment Services Inc. OpenCart Virtual POS Module allows Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation. This issue affects OpenCart Virtual POS Module: from 26.8.2 before 26.9.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9485 | 2026-10-11 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The OAuth Single Sign On – SSO (OAuth Client) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in versions up to, and including, 6.26.12. This is due to the plugin performing unsafe JWT token processing without verification or validation in the `get_resource_owner_from_id_token` function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication and gain access to any existing user account - including administrators in certain configurations - or to create arbitrary subscriber-level accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2026-106581 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Before 4.92.0, Docker Desktop for Windows did not verify the signature of a package supplied to Docker Desktop Installer.exe install -package. An attacker able to provide a crafted package and convince a user to approve the Docker-signed UAC prompt could execute attacker-controlled installer actions as LocalSystem. | |||||
| CVE-2026-84271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a signature verification bypass in the patch installer. An attacker with local access could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2026-107724 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. In 6.2.4, fast-jwt can classify raw serialized public JWK or JWKS JSON as an HMAC secret because src/crypto.js performDetectPublicKeyAlgorithms treats non-PEM strings as symmetric key material. If HS256 is explicitly allowed or inferred, an attacker who knows the exact serialized public-key bytes can use those bytes as an HMAC key and create a token containing arbitrary claims that createVerifier accepts. Serialization ordering or whitespace differences can prevent exploitation, and applications using supported PEM keys with an asymmetric-only algorithm allowlist are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 6.3.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-107720 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 6.3.1, fast-jwt createVerifier accepts an unsigned JWT when key is an empty string or null and algorithms is a non-empty allowlist. Falsy synchronous keys bypass prepareKeyOrSecret, allowedAlgorithms remains active, hasKey is false, and the empty signature avoids the verifySignature gate. An attacker can therefore submit a token containing arbitrary claims without possessing a signing key, resulting in authentication or authorization bypass. Claim validators still run, and non-empty keys, an empty key without algorithms, and the async key resolver path do not have this behavior. This issue is fixed in version 6.3.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-103329 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Super Payments WordPress plugin before 1.43.1 does not properly verify the authenticity of incoming payment webhook notifications, as the signing key used to validate their signature is empty by default, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a valid signature and mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as paid without payment. | |||||
| CVE-2026-25302 | 1 Qualcomm | 584 Ar8035, Ar8035 Firmware, Cologne and 581 more | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Cryptographic Issue when processing non-ELF partitions, authentication and signature checks are bypassed, allowing unsigned or corrupted images to be mounted and processed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-42784 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76482 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL | ||
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the engineering team for Cisco License On-Prem, formerly Cisco Smart Software Manager On-Prem (SSM On-Prem), has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76482 are related to issues with improper input verification that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-347. | |||||
| CVE-2026-74876 | 1 Jahlives | 1 Openssl Encrypt | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain a vulnerability in PublicKeyBundle.from_dict() that creates key bundles from untrusted data without verifying signatures. Attackers can call from_dict() followed by to_identity() without signature verification to encrypt data using attacker-controlled public keys, leaking secrets. | |||||
| CVE-2026-29000 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| pac4j-jwt versions prior to 4.5.9, 5.7.9, and 6.3.3 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in JwtAuthenticator when processing encrypted JWTs that allows remote attackers to forge authentication tokens. Attackers who possess the server's RSA public key can create a JWE-wrapped PlainJWT with arbitrary subject and role claims, bypassing signature verification to authenticate as any user including administrators. | |||||
| CVE-2023-54355 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| PocketMine-MP versions before 5.3.1 and 4.23.1 fail to validate that the identityPublicKey in LoginPacket uses the required secp384r1 elliptic curve. Attackers can provide LoginPackets with keys using different curves or non-EC key types to pass login verification but trigger an uncaught exception during ECDH key derivation, crashing the server. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18152 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Financial Transaction Manager, Openshift | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | |||||