Total
507 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-63490 | 2026-08-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Handlebars.java provides logic-less and semantic Mustache templates with Java. Prior to 4.5.3, com.github.jknack.handlebars.springmvc.SpringTemplateLoader resolves attacker-influenced Spring MVC view names through Spring ResourceLoader without the path-containment validation used by other URL-based loaders. In handlebars-springmvc/src/main/java/com/github/jknack/handlebars/springmvc/SpringTemplateLoader.java, a view name using a file: or classpath: URL and ending with the # fragment delimiter places the appended .hbs suffix in the fragment, which FileUrlResource.exists() and URL.openStream() discard. HandlebarsViewResolver in handlebars-springmvc/src/main/java/com/github/jknack/handlebars/springmvc/HandlebarsViewResolver.java then passes the attacker-controlled name to handlebars.compile(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to read files accessible to the JVM when an application exposes a controller with a user-influenced view name. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.3. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23379 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2026-21082 | 1 Samsung | 1 Health | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Relative path traversal in Samsung Health prior to version 7.0.0 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2026-70337 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Powershell | 2026-08-14 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Relative path traversal in Microsoft PowerShell Core allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65810 | 1 Microsoft | 14 .net Framework, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2026-08-14 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Relative path traversal in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-58481 | 1 Network-ai | 1 Network-ai | 2026-08-13 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Network-AI is a TypeScript/Node.js multi-agent orchestrator. Prior to version 5.12.2, `AgentRuntime` promises scoped file access under a configured sandbox `basePath`, but its path containment checks use raw string prefix tests. A sandbox base such as `/tmp/network-ai-sandbox` also matches a sibling path such as `/tmp/network-ai-sandbox_evil/secret.txt`. An agent/user that can call `AgentRuntime.readFile()` or `AgentRuntime.listDir()` can read or list files outside the intended sandbox when the target path is in a sibling directory sharing the base path prefix. This breaks the documented sandbox boundary. The issue is fixed in v5.12.2. `SandboxPolicy.resolvePath()` and `isPathAllowed()` now use separator-anchored prefix checks (`resolved === base || resolved.startsWith(base + path.sep)`) for both the allow-list and block-list. A sibling directory that merely shares a name prefix (e.g. `/srv/app-evil` vs base `/srv/app`) is no longer treated as in-scope. | |||||
| CVE-2026-58413 | 1 Network-ai | 1 Network-ai | 2026-08-13 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Network-AI is a TypeScript/Node.js multi-agent orchestrator. Prior to version 5.12.2, `EnvironmentManager.restore(env, backupId)` computes the backup path with `join(envDir, '.backups', backupId)` and only checks that this path exists. It does not resolve the result or verify that it remains under `data/<env>/.backups`. A caller can pass a traversal backup ID such as `../../../outside/source-dir` to restore files from an arbitrary directory into the target environment data directory. The issue is fixed in v5.12.2. `restore()` now validates `backupId` against `/^[\w\-]+$/` and asserts `dirname(resolve(join(backupsDir, backupId))) === resolve(backupsDir)` before touching the filesystem. Backup IDs containing path separators or `..` are rejected, so a crafted ID can no longer copy directories from outside `.backups/` into the environment. | |||||
| CVE-2026-16230 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The Formidable Digital Signatures plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the delete_file function in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete files on the server by supplying an attacker-controlled filename in the item_meta[field_id][content] parameter alongside the delete_saved_image flag during the standard entry-creation POST flow on any form that accepts anonymous submissions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-62837 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sharepoint Server | 2026-08-11 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Relative path traversal in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66881 | 1 Livebook | 1 Livebook | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows an attacker-authored notebook to write a file with attacker-controlled content to an arbitrary path. A .livemd notebook can declare file_entries metadata, each entry carrying a name. Every path that creates a file entry through the user interface validates that name with Livebook.Notebook.validate_file_entry_name/2, which requires a flat filename of alphanumerics, dashes, underscores and dots, ending in an extension. The import path does not: Livebook.LiveMarkdown.Import.file_entry_metadata_to_attrs/1 in lib/livebook/live_markdown/import.ex takes the name verbatim from the notebook source. For a URL-type file entry, Livebook.Session.file_entry_cache_file/2 in lib/livebook/session.ex resolves that name beneath the session's temporary directory without checking that the result stays inside it, and Livebook.FileSystem.Utils.resolve_unix_like_path/2 collapses parent-directory segments while clamping only at the filesystem root. When the entry's content is requested and no cached copy exists, Livebook fetches the entry's URL and writes the response body to the resolved path, creating parent directories as needed. The attacker therefore controls both the destination and the contents of the written file, which may land anywhere the Livebook process can write. The same missing containment check is present in Livebook.Session.to_attachment_file_entry/2. A victim who opens an attacker-supplied notebook and causes the entry to be fetched triggers the write within their own authenticated session; the attacker needs no account on the target instance. URL-type entries are also not placed under notebook stamping quarantine on import, so no warning is shown. This issue affects livebook: from 0.11.0 before 0.18.7 and from 0.19.0 before 0.19.9. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43454 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-38258 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and 3 more | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2023-38185 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2023-35359 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 9 more | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2026-6540 | 1 Tigera | 1 Calico | 2026-08-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Calico's Application Layer Policy (disabled by default), which enforces HTTP rules through Dikastes, fails to perform URL path normalization. As a result, HTTP requests using path-traversal segments, encoded slashes, or repeated slashes are not correctly evaluated by Prefix path rules. Dikastes authorizes the request under the permitted prefix while the downstream workload or a fronting proxy normalizes the path and serves the restricted endpoint. An attacker with network access and no special RBAC can potentially reach HTTP endpoints the policy was intended to restrict. | |||||
| CVE-2026-56794 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Server Administrator | 2026-08-08 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Dell OpenManage Server Administrator, versions prior to 11.1.0.2, contains a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Filesystem access for attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14903 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Xtraction | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| Path traversal in Ivanti Xtraction before version 2026.2.1 allows a remote authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files outside the web root. | |||||
| CVE-2026-61343 | 2026-07-30 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| LibreBooking's email template editor save action passes the submitted template name directly into the destination file path, allowing a remote attacker with administrator credentials to write an arbitrary file outside the template directory and execute code. Fixed in 5.1.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-47078 | 2026-07-30 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in Erlang OTP (stdlib zip module) allows writing files outside the intended extraction directory via a crafted zip archive. zip:unzip/1,2 and zip:extract/1,2 validate entry paths using zip:check_dir_level/2, which tracks directory depth as a running integer counter: .. decrements it, normal path components increment it. The caller rejects only paths where the final counter value is less than zero. A path such as ../x/y causes the counter to go negative mid-traversal then recover to zero, passing validation while resolving to a location outside the extraction directory when joined with the current working directory via add_cwd. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/stdlib/src/zip.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.1 before OTP 29.0.4, OTP 28.5.0.4 and OTP 27.3.4.15, corresponding to stdlib from 6.1 before 8.0.3, 7.3.0.1 and 6.2.2.4. | |||||
| CVE-2026-63303 | 2026-07-30 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A Path Traversal vulnerability exists in Quick.CMS through the URI path component of HTTP requests, where the server fails to normalize dot-dot-slash (../) sequences before resolving and serving the requested file. An authenticated attacker with admin privileges can use this vulnerability to read contents of files located in the sibling directory of the webroot via a crafted HTTP request containing ../ sequences in the URI. The vendor assessed the likelihood of exploitation as very low and determined that a fix is not necessary. | |||||