Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Filtered by product Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes
Subscribe
Total
17 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-44495 | 2 Axios, Redhat | 12 Axios, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Advanced Cluster Security and 9 more | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4740 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-09-08 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Open Cluster Management (OCM), the technology underlying Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (ACM). Improper validation of Kubernetes client certificate renewal allows a managed cluster administrator to forge a client certificate that can be approved by the OCM controller. This enables cross-cluster privilege escalation and may allow an attacker to gain control over other managed clusters, including the hub cluster. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71846 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Insights-client | 2026-09-05 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in insights-client. The component's ServiceAccount is bound to a ClusterRole granting cluster-wide secrets get, list, and watch permissions, while the code only requires access to a single specific Secret. This excessive privilege means that a compromise of the insights-client pod or ServiceAccount token would grant an attacker read access to all Secrets across the hub cluster, including managed-cluster kubeconfigs and other sensitive credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71845 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Insights-client | 2026-09-05 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in insights-client. The setDefault() function logs the value of every environment variable it processes, including CCX_TOKEN, a bearer credential used in disconnected cluster deployments. When glog verbosity is set to level 2 or higher, the token is written in clear text to the pod log on every startup. An attacker with access to pod logs or centralized logging could obtain the credential, leading to unauthorized access to the CCX API. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71475 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Insights-client | 2026-09-05 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in insights-client. A compromised managed cluster, referred to as a 'spoke', can inject unencoded data into the Insights API URL path. This occurs because the ClusterID, which is controlled by the spoke, is used directly in the request path without proper validation or URL encoding. This vulnerability allows a malicious spoke to redirect authenticated requests to unintended API endpoints, potentially leading to information disclosure or unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71474 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Insights-client | 2026-09-05 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in insights-client. When the application receives a non-200 response, it logs the request headers, which can include the cloud.openshift.com pull-secret token. A local user with access to pod logs on the hub could read this long-lived credential. This information disclosure could grant unauthorized access to Red Hat cloud services. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 33 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 30 more | 324 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 321 more | 2026-08-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | |||||
| CVE-2025-57851 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6017 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management through versions 2.10, before 2.10.7, 2.11, before 2.11.4, and 2.12, before 2.12.4. This vulnerability allows an unprivileged user to view confidential managed cluster credentials through the UI. This information should only be accessible to authorized users and may result in the loss of confidentiality of administrative information, which could be leaked to unauthorized actors. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14874 | 2 Nodemailer, Redhat | 4 Nodemailer, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Ceph Storage and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Nodemailer. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted email address header that triggers infinite recursion in the address parser. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3027 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| The grc-policy-propagator allows security escalation within the cluster. The propagator allows policies which contain some dynamically obtained values (instead of the policy apply a static manifest on a managed cluster) of taking advantage of cluster scoped access in a created policy. This feature does not restrict properly to lookup content from the namespace where the policy was created. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3841 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| RHACM: unauthenticated SSRF in console API endpoint. A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was found in the console API endpoint from Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes (RHACM). An attacker could take advantage of this as the console API endpoint is missing an authentication check, allowing unauthenticated users making requests. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3248 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift API, as admission checks do not enforce "custom-host" permissions. This issue could allow an attacker to violate the boundaries, as permissions will not be applied. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2238 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in the search-api container in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes when a query in the search filter gets parsed by the backend. This flaw allows an attacker to craft specific strings containing special characters that lead to crashing the pod and affects system availability while restarting. | |||||
| CVE-2022-27191 | 3 Fedoraproject, Golang, Redhat | 5 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Ssh and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The golang.org/x/crypto/ssh package before 0.0.0-20220314234659-1baeb1ce4c0b for Go allows an attacker to crash a server in certain circumstances involving AddHostKey. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25688 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-06-17 | 2.7 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| A flaw was found in rhacm versions before 2.0.5 and before 2.1.0. Two internal service APIs were incorrectly provisioned using a test certificate from the source repository. This would result in all installations using the same certificates. If an attacker could observe network traffic internal to a cluster, they could use the private key to decode API requests that should be protected by TLS sessions, potentially obtaining information they would not otherwise be able to. These certificates are not used for service authentication, so no opportunity for impersonation or active MITM attacks were made possible. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25655 | 1 Redhat | 1 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in ManagedClusterView API, that could allow secrets to be disclosed to users without the correct permissions. Views created for an admin user would be made available for a short time to users with only view permission. In this short time window the user with view permission could read cluster secrets that should only be disclosed to admin users. | |||||