Total
397453 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78572 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78570 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78568 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78566 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78563 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78562 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78477 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51740 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the killProcess function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to terminate critical services via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51735 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Incorrect access control in the showSyslog function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve recent system logs via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51719 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Incorrect access control in the delUrlFilterRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to remove URL filtering rules via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51718 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the delStaticDhcpRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to remove static DHCP reservations via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51717 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the setOpModeCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to change the device operating mode via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51716 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Incorrect access control in the delPortForwardRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to delete port-forwarding rules via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51711 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the setWiFiWpsStart function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to open a wireless pairing window via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51710 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the setParentalRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter parental-control behavior via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51709 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the setWiFiBasicCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to reconfigure primary Wi-Fi settings via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51701 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Incorrect access control in the setMacFilterRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to change device access control via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51152 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the /har/test endpoint in QD 20220208 through 20250803. Fetcher.build_request() in libs/fetcher.py constructs an httpclient.HTTPRequest from user-supplied JSON without validating URL scheme, host, or IP range. The /har/test handler does not require authentication, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to force the QD server to send arbitrary HTTP requests to internal network resources and cloud metadata endpoints. validate_cert is set to False, disabling TLS verification. | |||||
| CVE-2026-72642 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The native inference process that Elasticsearch uses to evaluate uploaded machine learning models accepts a model operation that computes a memory address from an offset supplied inside the model, without validating that the offset stays within the bounds of the underlying storage. A user with the privileges required to upload and deploy a trained model can craft a model that reads and writes memory outside the intended allocation. The result is heap corruption that crashes the inference process, and, with sufficient control over the heap layout, could allow arbitrary code execution in the context of that process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78475 | 2 Gimp, Redhat | 2 Gimp, Enterprise Linux | 2026-09-01 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the file-pix (ESM) plugin in GIMP. When processing a specially crafted PIX image file, the plugin allocates a Variable-Length Array (VLA) on the stack without proper bounds checking, causing an unbounded stack allocation followed by a 21-byte stack over-read. This can result in a denial of service due to stack exhaustion and a limited information disclosure of stack memory contents into an intermediate file. | |||||