Filtered by vendor Splunk
Subscribe
Total
406 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-22890 | 8 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 11 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Fedora and 8 more | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| curl 7.63.0 to and including 7.75.0 includes vulnerability that allows a malicious HTTPS proxy to MITM a connection due to bad handling of TLS 1.3 session tickets. When using a HTTPS proxy and TLS 1.3, libcurl can confuse session tickets arriving from the HTTPS proxy but work as if they arrived from the remote server and then wrongly "short-cut" the host handshake. When confusing the tickets, a HTTPS proxy can trick libcurl to use the wrong session ticket resume for the host and thereby circumvent the server TLS certificate check and make a MITM attack to be possible to perform unnoticed. Note that such a malicious HTTPS proxy needs to provide a certificate that curl will accept for the MITMed server for an attack to work - unless curl has been told to ignore the server certificate check. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22876 | 8 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 12 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Fedora and 9 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| curl 7.1.1 to and including 7.75.0 is vulnerable to an "Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor" by leaking credentials in the HTTP Referer: header. libcurl does not strip off user credentials from the URL when automatically populating the Referer: HTTP request header field in outgoing HTTP requests, and therefore risks leaking sensitive data to the server that is the target of the second HTTP request. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3520 | 4 Lz4 Project, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 7 Lz4, Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Backup and 4 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| There's a flaw in lz4. An attacker who submits a crafted file to an application linked with lz4 may be able to trigger an integer overflow, leading to calling of memmove() on a negative size argument, causing an out-of-bounds write and/or a crash. The greatest impact of this flaw is to availability, with some potential impact to confidentiality and integrity as well. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8286 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 20 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 17 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| curl 7.41.0 through 7.73.0 is vulnerable to an improper check for certificate revocation due to insufficient verification of the OCSP response. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8285 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 30 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 27 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8284 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 29 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 26 more | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8231 | 5 Debian, Haxx, Oracle and 2 more | 5 Debian Linux, Libcurl, Communications Cloud Native Core Policy and 2 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Due to use of a dangling pointer, libcurl 7.29.0 through 7.71.1 can use the wrong connection when sending data. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8177 | 5 Debian, Fujitsu, Haxx and 2 more | 16 Debian Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 13 more | 2026-10-14 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| curl 7.20.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to improper restriction of names for files and other resources that can lead too overwriting a local file when the -J flag is used. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8169 | 4 Debian, Haxx, Siemens and 1 more | 6 Debian Linux, Curl, Simatic Tim 1531 Irc and 3 more | 2026-10-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| curl 7.62.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to an information disclosure vulnerability that can lead to a partial password being leaked over the network and to the DNS server(s). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20838 | 3 Apple, Pcre, Splunk | 3 Macos, Pcre, Universal Forwarder | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| libpcre in PCRE before 8.43 allows a subject buffer over-read in JIT when UTF is disabled, and \X or \R has more than one fixed quantifier, a related issue to CVE-2019-20454. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36227 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Libarchive and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libarchive and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In libarchive before 3.6.2, the software does not check for an error after calling calloc function that can return with a NULL pointer if the function fails, which leads to a resultant NULL pointer dereference. NOTE: the discoverer cites this CWE-476 remark but third parties dispute the code-execution impact: "In rare circumstances, when NULL is equivalent to the 0x0 memory address and privileged code can access it, then writing or reading memory is possible, which may lead to code execution." | |||||
| CVE-2020-14155 | 6 Apple, Gitlab, Netapp and 3 more | 20 Macos, Gitlab, Active Iq Unified Manager and 17 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| libpcre in PCRE before 8.44 allows an integer overflow via a large number after a (?C substring. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20384 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-09-25 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.0.1, 9.4.6, 9.3.8, and 9.2.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.1.2507.4, 10.0.2503.6, and 9.3.2411.117.125, an unauthenticated attacker can inject American National Standards Institute (ANSI) escape codes into Splunk log files due to improper validation at the /en-US/static/ web endpoint. This may allow them to poison, forge, or obfuscate sensitive log data through specially crafted HTTP requests, potentially impacting log integrity and detection capabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76356 | 1 Splunk | 1 Soar | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, an unauthenticated user could spoof the source IP address in a crafted request to an Automation Broker notification endpoint and execute arbitrary code on the Splunk SOAR host. The vulnerability is possible because the Splunk SOAR Automation Broker trusts a client-supplied source IP address header as proof that the request originates from the local system. Successful exploitation can expose all relevant data, affect system integrity, and disrupt service availability. For more information see About Splunk SOAR Automation Broker (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/splunk-automation-broker/about-splunk-soar-automation-broker/about-splunk-soar-automation-broker) in the Splunk documentation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76338 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, an unauthenticated user who has access to a trusted distributed search private key could forge an administrative session token, access all relevant data, affect system integrity, and disrupt service availability. The vulnerability is possible because the distributed search authentication token endpoint does not require a signed request to identify a configured search peer, allowing the request to fall back to shared local key material. For more information see About distributed search (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/distributed-search/10.4/overview-of-distributed-search/about-distributed-search) and authentication.conf (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.4/configuration-file-reference/10.4.2-configuration-file-reference/authentication.conf) in Splunk documentation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76335 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, an authenticated user who does not hold a role with the edit_manager_xml capability could write a malicious Splunk Web Manager Extensible Markup Language (XML) configuration. When the same user opens the affected Splunk Web Manager page, Splunk Enterprise runs attacker-controlled operating-system commands as the user account running Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Web does not require the edit_manager_xml capability before accepting Splunk Web Manager XML configuration changes. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76334 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who holds the "power" Splunk role could store a Dashboard Studio workflow action containing attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL). When another authenticated user selects the action from Event Actions and selects Continue, Splunk Enterprise runs the injected SPL using the permissions of that user. The injected SPL could access or modify data available to that user. The vulnerability is possible because Dashboard Studio does not sufficiently validate workflow-action URLs before submitting requests. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the affected user by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The user who holds the "power" Splunk role should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76332 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, an unauthenticated user could trick an authenticated user into opening a crafted link to Analytics Workspace. When the authenticated user opens the link, Splunk Enterprise runs attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL) using the permissions of that user. The injected SPL could access data and perform actions available to that user. The vulnerability is possible because Analytics Workspace does not sufficiently validate data used to build searches. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the user by tricking them into opening the crafted link. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76331 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could inject Search Processing Language (SPL) into saved-search dispatch requests. This could allow for unauthorized access to all relevant data and affect system integrity within Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Enterprise does not correctly validate caller-supplied time values before using them in saved-search dispatch. For more information see Search endpoint descriptions (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/rest-api-reference/10.2/search-endpoints/search-endpoint-descriptions) in the Splunk documentation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76330 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, an unauthenticated user could trick an authenticated user into opening a crafted link to Monitoring Console. When the authenticated user opens the link, Splunk Enterprise runs attacker-controlled Search Processing Language (SPL) using the permissions of that user. The injected SPL could access data and perform actions available to that user. The vulnerability is possible because Monitoring Console does not sufficiently validate data used to build forwarder dashboard searches. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the user by tricking them into opening the crafted link. The unauthenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||