Filtered by vendor Splunk
Subscribe
Total
406 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-20369 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-10-18 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.4, 9.3.6, and 9.2.8, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.108, 9.3.2408.118 and 9.2.2406.123, a low privilege user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could perform an extensible markup language (XML) external entity (XXE) injection through the dashboard tab label field. The XXE injection has the potential to cause denial of service (DoS) attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20366 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-10-18 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.4, 9.3.6, and 9.2.8, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.111, 9.3.2408.119, and 9.2.2406.122, a low-privileged user that does not hold the admin or power Splunk roles could access sensitive search results if Splunk Enterprise runs an administrative search job in the background. If the low privileged user guesses the search job’s unique Search ID (SID), the user could retrieve the results of that job, potentially exposing sensitive search results. For more information see https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/search-manual/10.0/manage-jobs/about-jobs-and-job-management and https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/search/search-manual/10.0/manage-jobs/manage-search-jobs. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20379 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-10-18 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.0.1, 9.4.5, 9.3.7, and 9.2.9 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.116, 9.3.2408.124, 10.0.2503.5 and 10.1.2507.1, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could run a saved search with a risky command using the permissions of a higher-privileged user to bypass the SPL safeguards for risky commands. They could bypass these safeguards on the “/services/streams/search“ endpoint through its “q“ parameter by circumventing endpoint restrictions using character encoding in the REST path. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The authenticated user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20378 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-10-18 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.0.1, 9.4.5, 9.3.7, 9.2.9, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.0.2503.5, 9.3.2411.111, and 9.3.2408.121, an unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious URL using the `return_to` parameter of the Splunk Web login endpoint. When an authenticated user visits the malicious URL, it could cause an unvalidated redirect to an external malicious site. To be successful, the attacker has to trick the victim into initiating a request from their browser. The unauthenticated attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76285 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-10-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76285 are related to improper adherence to coding standards and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-710. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76284 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-10-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76284 are related to improper neutralization and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-707. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76283 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-10-16 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76283 are related to protection mechanism failure and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-693. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76282 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-10-16 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, Cisco has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76282 are related to improper control of a resource through its lifetime and are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-664. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27538 | 6 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 15 Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux, Fedora and 12 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in libcurl prior to v8.0.0 where it reuses a previously established SSH connection despite the fact that an SSH option was modified, which should have prevented reuse. libcurl maintains a pool of previously used connections to reuse them for subsequent transfers if the configurations match. However, two SSH settings were omitted from the configuration check, allowing them to match easily, potentially leading to the reuse of an inappropriate connection. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27533 | 4 Fedoraproject, Haxx, Netapp and 1 more | 13 Fedora, Curl, Active Iq Unified Manager and 10 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in input validation exists in curl <8.0 during communication using the TELNET protocol may allow an attacker to pass on maliciously crafted user name and "telnet options" during server negotiation. The lack of proper input scrubbing allows an attacker to send content or perform option negotiation without the application's intent. This vulnerability could be exploited if an application allows user input, thereby enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23914 | 3 Haxx, Netapp, Splunk | 12 Curl, Active Iq Unified Manager, Clustered Data Ontap and 9 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability exists in curl <v7.88.0 that could cause HSTS functionality fail when multiple URLs are requested serially. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS instead of usingan insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in the URL. ThisHSTS mechanism would however surprisingly be ignored by subsequent transferswhen done on the same command line because the state would not be properlycarried on. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43551 | 4 Fedoraproject, Haxx, Netapp and 1 more | 7 Fedora, Curl, Active Iq Unified Manager and 4 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS instead of using an insecure clear-text HTTP step even when HTTP is provided in the URL. However, the HSTS mechanism could be bypassed if the host name in the given URL first uses IDN characters that get replaced to ASCII counterparts as part of the IDN conversion. Like using the character UTF-8 U+3002 (IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP) instead of the common ASCII full stop (U+002E) `.`. Then in a subsequent request, it does not detect the HSTS state and makes a clear text transfer. Because it would store the info IDN encoded but look for it IDN decoded. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42916 | 4 Apple, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 1 more | 4 Macos, Fedora, Curl and 1 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In curl before 7.86.0, the HSTS check could be bypassed to trick it into staying with HTTP. Using its HSTS support, curl can be instructed to use HTTPS directly (instead of using an insecure cleartext HTTP step) even when HTTP is provided in the URL. This mechanism could be bypassed if the host name in the given URL uses IDN characters that get replaced with ASCII counterparts as part of the IDN conversion, e.g., using the character UTF-8 U+3002 (IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP) instead of the common ASCII full stop of U+002E (.). The earliest affected version is 7.77.0 2021-05-26. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42915 | 5 Apple, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 2 more | 13 Macos, Fedora, Curl and 10 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| curl before 7.86.0 has a double free. If curl is told to use an HTTP proxy for a transfer with a non-HTTP(S) URL, it sets up the connection to the remote server by issuing a CONNECT request to the proxy, and then tunnels the rest of the protocol through. An HTTP proxy might refuse this request (HTTP proxies often only allow outgoing connections to specific port numbers, like 443 for HTTPS) and instead return a non-200 status code to the client. Due to flaws in the error/cleanup handling, this could trigger a double free in curl if one of the following schemes were used in the URL for the transfer: dict, gopher, gophers, ldap, ldaps, rtmp, rtmps, or telnet. The earliest affected version is 7.77.0. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35737 | 3 Netapp, Splunk, Sqlite | 3 Ontap Select Deploy Administration Utility, Universal Forwarder, Sqlite | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a string argument to a C API. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35260 | 4 Apple, Haxx, Netapp and 1 more | 12 Macos, Curl, Clustered Data Ontap and 9 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| curl can be told to parse a `.netrc` file for credentials. If that file endsin a line with 4095 consecutive non-white space letters and no newline, curlwould first read past the end of the stack-based buffer, and if the readworks, write a zero byte beyond its boundary.This will in most cases cause a segfault or similar, but circumstances might also cause different outcomes.If a malicious user can provide a custom netrc file to an application or otherwise affect its contents, this flaw could be used as denial-of-service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35252 | 5 Apple, Debian, Haxx and 2 more | 18 Macos, Debian Linux, Curl and 15 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| When curl is used to retrieve and parse cookies from a HTTP(S) server, itaccepts cookies using control codes that when later are sent back to a HTTPserver might make the server return 400 responses. Effectively allowing a"sister site" to deny service to all siblings. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32221 | 5 Apple, Debian, Haxx and 2 more | 13 Macos, Debian Linux, Curl and 10 more | 2026-10-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data to send, even when the `CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS` option has been set, if the same handle previously was used to issue a `PUT` request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the application and cause it to misbehave and either send off the wrong data or use memory after free or similar in the subsequent `POST` request. The problem exists in the logic for a reused handle when it is changed from a PUT to a POST. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32208 | 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 19 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 16 more | 2026-10-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| When curl < 7.84.0 does FTP transfers secured by krb5, it handles message verification failures wrongly. This flaw makes it possible for a Man-In-The-Middle attack to go unnoticed and even allows it to inject data to the client. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32207 | 6 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 19 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 16 more | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the operation with a rename from a temporary name to the final target file name.In that rename operation, it might accidentally *widen* the permissions for the target file, leaving the updated file accessible to more users than intended. | |||||