Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscribe
Total
2195 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0265 | 2 Paloaltonetworks, Siemens | 3 Pan-os, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables an unauthenticated attacker with network access to bypass authentication controls when Cloud Authentication Service (CAS) is enabled. The risk is higher if CAS is enabled on the management interface and lower when any other login interfaces are used. The risk of this issue is greatly reduced if you secure access to the management web interface by restricting access to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access® are not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0264 | 2 Paloaltonetworks, Siemens | 3 Pan-os, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in the DNS proxy and DNS Server features of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® Software allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition (all PAN-OS platforms except Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access) or potentially execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted network traffic (PA-Series hardware only). Panorama, Cloud NGFW, and Prisma® Access are not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-10585 | 2 Google, Siemens | 2 Chrome, Cadra | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.185 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2025-13223 | 2 Google, Siemens | 2 Chrome, Cadra | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.175 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2018-25032 | 12 Apple, Azul, Debian and 9 more | 39 Mac Os X, Macos, Zulu and 36 more | 2026-07-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption when deflating (i.e., when compressing) if the input has many distant matches. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34659 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simcenter Star-ccm\+ Viewer | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (All versions only if the Power-on-Demand public license server is used). Affected applications expose user, host and display name of users, when the public license server is used. This could allow an attacker to retrieve this information. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30065 | 2 Busybox, Siemens | 13 Busybox, Scalance Sc622-2c, Scalance Sc622-2c Firmware and 10 more | 2026-07-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free in Busybox 1.35-x's awk applet leads to denial of service and possibly code execution when processing a crafted awk pattern in the copyvar function. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8732 | 3 Ibm, Siemens, Xmlsoft | 5 Aix, Vios, Ruggedcom Rst2428p and 2 more | 2026-07-01 | 1.7 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| A vulnerability was found in libxml2 up to 2.14.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function xmlParseSGMLCatalog of the component xmlcatalog. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled recursion. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The code maintainer explains, that "[t]he issue can only be triggered with untrusted SGML catalogs and it makes absolutely no sense to use untrusted catalogs. I also doubt that anyone is still using SGML catalogs at all." | |||||
| CVE-2025-40947 | 1 Siemens | 22 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re and 19 more | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly sanitize user-supplied input during the feature key installation process. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary commands, resulting in remote code execution with root privileges on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-40948 | 1 Siemens | 22 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re and 19 more | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly validate input in the web server's JSON-RPC interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the underlying operating system's filesystem with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-40949 | 1 Siemens | 22 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re and 19 more | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly sanitize user-supplied input in the Scheduler functionality of the Web UI, allowing commands to be injected into the task scheduling backend. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-22924 | 1 Siemens | 2 Simatic Cn 4100, Simatic Cn 4100 Firmware | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions < V5.0). The affected application does not properly restrict unauthenticated connections and is susceptible to resource exhaustion conditions. This could allow an attacker to disrupt normal operations or perform unauthorized actions, potentially impacting system availability and integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2026-22925 | 1 Siemens | 2 Simatic Cn 4100, Simatic Cn 4100 Firmware | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions < V5.0). The affected application is susceptible to resource exhaustion when subjected to high volume of TCP SYN packets This could allow an attacker to render the service unavailable and cause denial-of-service conditions by overwhelming system resources. | |||||
| CVE-2026-44411 | 1 Siemens | 1 Solid Edge Se2026 | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 5). The affected application is vulnerable to uninitialized pointer access while parsing specially crafted PAR files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. | |||||
| CVE-2025-40745 | 1 Siemens | 7 Simcenter 3d, Simcenter Femap, Simcenter Star-ccm\+ Viewer and 4 more | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Siemens Software Center (All versions < V3.5.8.2), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Simcenter STAR-CCM+ (All versions < V2602), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 13), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 04), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions < V2504.0008). Affected applications do not properly validate client certificates to connect to Analytics Service endpoint. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform man in the middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6965 | 3 Apple, Siemens, Sqlite | 9 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 6 more | 2026-06-26 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| There exists a vulnerability in SQLite versions before 3.50.2 where the number of aggregate terms could exceed the number of columns available. This could lead to a memory corruption issue. We recommend upgrading to version 3.50.2 or above. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33893 | 1 Siemens | 1 Teamcenter | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2312 (All versions < V2312.0014), Teamcenter V2406 (All versions < V2406.0012), Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0009), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0005), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions). The affected application contains hardcoded key which is used for obfuscation stored directly into the application. This could allow an attacker to obtain these keys and misuse them to gain unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33862 | 1 Siemens | 1 Teamcenter | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V2312 (All versions < V2312.0014), Teamcenter V2406 (All versions < V2406.0012), Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0009), Teamcenter V2506 (All versions < V2506.0005), Teamcenter V2512 (All versions). The affected application does not properly encode or filter user-supplied data. This could allow an attacker to inject malicious code that can be executed by other users when they visit the affected page. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2673 | 2 Openssl, Siemens | 3 Openssl, Simatic Cn 4100, Simatic Cn 4100 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-27661 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Security Monitor | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.9.0). The affected application leaks confidential information in metadata, and files such as information on contributors and email address, on `SSM Server`. | |||||