Filtered by vendor Siemens
Subscribe
Total
2195 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-42059 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0 before 05.08.41, Kernel 5.1 before 05.16.41, Kernel 5.2 before 05.26.41, Kernel 5.3 before 05.35.41, and Kernel 5.4 before 05.42.20. A stack-based buffer overflow leads toarbitrary code execution in UEFI DisplayTypeDxe DXE driver. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41838 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in SdHostDriver in the kernel 5.0 through 5.5 in Insyde InsydeH2O. There is an SMM callout that allows an attacker to access the System Management Mode and execute arbitrary code. This occurs because of a Numeric Range Comparison Without a Minimum Check. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41837 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in AhciBusDxe in the kernel 5.0 through 5.5 in Insyde InsydeH2O. Because of an Untrusted Pointer Dereference that causes SMM memory corruption, an attacker may be able to write fixed or predictable data to SMRAM. Exploiting this issue could lead to escalating privileges to SMM. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33627 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 29 Insydeh2o, Simatic Field Pg M5, Simatic Field Pg M5 Firmware and 26 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O Kernel 5.0 before 05.09.11, 5.1 before 05.17.11, 5.2 before 05.27.11, 5.3 before 05.36.11, 5.4 before 05.44.11, and 5.5 before 05.52.11 affecting FwBlockServiceSmm. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33626 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 33 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Apr1808, Ruggedcom Apr1808 Firmware and 30 more | 2026-08-11 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in SMM (System Management Mode) branch that registers a SWSMI handler that does not sufficiently check or validate the allocated buffer pointer(QWORD values for CommBuffer). This can be used by an attacker to corrupt data in SMRAM memory and even lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33625 | 3 Insyde, Netapp, Siemens | 34 Insydeh2o, Fas\/aff Bios, Ruggedcom Ape1808 and 31 more | 2026-08-11 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Kernel 5.x in Insyde InsydeH2O, affecting HddPassword. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5953 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 33 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware and 30 more | 2026-08-11 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in System Management Interrupt (SWSMI) handler of InsydeH2O UEFI Firmware code located in SWSMI handler that dereferences gRT (EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES) pointer to call a GetVariable service, which is located outside of SMRAM. This can result in code execution in SMM (escalating privilege from ring 0 to ring -2). | |||||
| CVE-2020-27339 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 33 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Apr1808, Ruggedcom Apr1808 Firmware and 30 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In the kernel in Insyde InsydeH2O 5.x, certain SMM drivers did not correctly validate the CommBuffer and CommBufferSize parameters, allowing callers to corrupt either the firmware or the OS memory. The fixed versions for this issue in the AhciBusDxe, IdeBusDxe, NvmExpressDxe, SdHostDriverDxe, and SdMmcDeviceDxe drivers are 05.16.25, 05.26.25, 05.35.25, 05.43.25, and 05.51.25 (for Kernel 5.1 through 5.5). | |||||
| CVE-2021-40438 | 11 Apache, Broadcom, Debian and 8 more | 40 Http Server, Brocade Fabric Operating System Firmware, Debian Linux and 37 more | 2026-08-06 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49894 | 3 Debian, Linux, Siemens | 5 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, Simatic S7-1500 Tm Mfp and 2 more | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix index out of bounds in degamma hardware format translation Fixes index out of bounds issue in `cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format` function. The issue could occur when the index 'i' exceeds the number of transfer function points (TRANSFER_FUNC_POINTS). The fix adds a check to ensure 'i' is within bounds before accessing the transfer function points. If 'i' is out of bounds the function returns false to indicate an error. Reported by smatch: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:594 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.red' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:595 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.green' 1025 <= s32max drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_cm_common.c:596 cm_helper_translate_curve_to_degamma_hw_format() error: buffer overflow 'output_tf->tf_pts.blue' 1025 <= s32max | |||||
| CVE-2025-38502 | 3 Debian, Linux, Siemens | 4 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, Simatic Cn 4100 and 1 more | 2026-07-30 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage Lonial reported that an out-of-bounds access in cgroup local storage can be crafted via tail calls. Given two programs each utilizing a cgroup local storage with a different value size, and one program doing a tail call into the other. The verifier will validate each of the indivial programs just fine. However, in the runtime context the bpf_cg_run_ctx holds an bpf_prog_array_item which contains the BPF program as well as any cgroup local storage flavor the program uses. Helpers such as bpf_get_local_storage() pick this up from the runtime context: ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_cg_run_ctx, run_ctx); storage = ctx->prog_item->cgroup_storage[stype]; if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED) ptr = &READ_ONCE(storage->buf)->data[0]; else ptr = this_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf); For the second program which was called from the originally attached one, this means bpf_get_local_storage() will pick up the former program's map, not its own. With mismatching sizes, this can result in an unintended out-of-bounds access. To fix this issue, we need to extend bpf_map_owner with an array of storage_cookie[] to match on i) the exact maps from the original program if the second program was using bpf_get_local_storage(), or ii) allow the tail call combination if the second program was not using any of the cgroup local storage maps. | |||||
| CVE-2026-46749 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Ins | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The affected application uses a password hashing implementation with a static, hardcoded salt shared across all users and installations, and is configured with an insufficient number of iterations. This could allow an attacker to efficiently recover user passwords using brute-force or precomputed attacks, potentially resulting in unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2026-46748 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Ins | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The affected system includes a binary that is configured with the cap_dac_override capability. This capability allows the process to bypass file system permission checks, resulting in unrestricted file system access. This could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges leading to arbitrary file modification and gaining root privileges on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-46746 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Ins | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The application does not properly sanitize user input in the /api/sftp/uploadFiles endpoint, allowing the injection of shell command payloads via crafted directory names. These payloads are stored and executed when directory listings are retrieved. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the affected service user (sinecins). | |||||
| CVE-2026-24349 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simatic Wincc Unified Pc Runtime | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V16 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V17 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V18 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V19 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V20 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC Unified PC Runtime V21 (All versions < V21 Update 2). Insufficient protection of key material in WinCC Certificate Manager that could allow an attacker to extract sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2026-46747 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Ins | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 6). The affected application does not properly sanitize path input in the `GET /api/sftp/uploadFiles` endpoint used for directory listing. This allows path traversal through crafted input, enabling access to unintended file system locations. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0256 | 2 Paloaltonetworks, Siemens | 3 Pan-os, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables a malicious authenticated administrator to store a JavaScript payload using the web interface. This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0261 | 2 Paloaltonetworks, Siemens | 3 Pan-os, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Multiple command injection vulnerabilities in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enable an authenticated administrator to bypass system restrictions and run arbitrary commands as a root user. To be able to exploit this issue, the user must have access to the PAN-OS CLI or Web UI. The security risk posed by this issue is significantly minimized when CLI access is restricted to a limited group of administrators and by restricting access to the management web interface to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma Access® are not impacted by these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0262 | 2 Paloaltonetworks, Siemens | 3 Pan-os, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple denial of service vulnerabilities in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition by sending specially crafted network traffic. Panorama and Cloud NGFW are not impacted by these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0258 | 2 Paloaltonetworks, Siemens | 3 Pan-os, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the IKEv2 implementation of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause the firewall to send network requests to unintended destinations or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. Panorama, Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not impacted by these vulnerabilities. | |||||