Total
398554 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-74484 | 2026-08-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: binfmt_misc: don't let an 'F' entry pin its own instance An entry registered with 'F' opens its interpreter at registration time and holds that file until the entry is freed. Any entry nobody removes by hand only gets closed once the binfmt_misc superblock is shut down. If the interpreter lives on a mount that keeps that superblock alive the two pin each other: binfmt_misc sb -> inode -> entry -> interp_file -> vfsmount -> binfmt_misc sb TL;DR the file is never closed. Once the mount namespace is gone there is nothing left to unregister through either. There are two ways to trigger this bug: - Point the interpreter at the instance itself. Its files are regular files owned by the mounter and both bm_get_inode() and simple_fill_super() leave i_op at empty_iops. So notify_change() falls back to simple_setattr() and chmod +x works. We never set SB_I_NOEXEC and so open_exec() accepts it. - Use the instance as an overlayfs lower layer. The overlay superblock holds a clone_private_mount() of every layer until it is destroyed and that clone is in no namespace. So umount_tree() never reaches it. That's a DoS. And it isn't only the superblock that leaks. It pins the user namespace it was mounted in, so every iteration permanently eats one of the caller's user namespace charges. So let's just do the sane thing. SB_I_NOEXEC makes open_exec() fail on the instance's own files and s_stack_depth makes overlayfs reject the layer before it ever takes a clone. That also covers the ecryptfs and fuse passthrough variants. What 'F' promises is unchanged. The stable tag is narrower than the Fixes tags on purpose. Before sandboxed mounts this needed global root against the single instance everyone shares, and the change doesn't apply to those trees anyway. Note that SB_I_NODEV is implicitly raised for userns mounts but raise it explicitly here as well. | |||||
| CVE-2026-64158 | 2026-08-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2026-59310 | 1 Vmware | 5 Cloud Foundation, Telco Cloud Infrastructure, Telco Cloud Platform and 2 more | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| VMware vCenter contains a directory traversal vulnerability in the Syslog server. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2026-55040 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sharepoint Server | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Weak authentication in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-17048 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Of Keycloak | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the Keycloak Admin REST API, which is used to manage security realms and clients. The issue occurs when the system processes requests for rotated client secrets that are stored in a secure vault. Due to improper boundary enforcement, a delegated administrator with view-only permissions can retrieve the actual resolved secret instead of the vault placeholder, leading to the exposure of sensitive credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2251 | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM | ||
| A security flaw exists in WildFly and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) within the Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) remote invocation mechanism. This vulnerability stems from untrusted data deserialization handled by JBoss Marshalling. This flaw allows an attacker to send a specially crafted serialized object, leading to remote code execution without requiring authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23366 | 1 Redhat | 1 Hal Management Console | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the HAL Console in the Wildfly component, which does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output used as a web page that is served to other users. The attacker must be authenticated as a user that belongs to management groups “SuperUser”, “Admin”, or “Maintainer”. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10234 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in Wildfly, where a user may perform Cross-site scripting in the Wildfly deployment system. This flaw allows an attacker or insider to execute a deployment with a malicious payload, which could trigger undesired behavior against the server. | |||||
| CVE-2026-56089 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) a Path Traversal vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-56090 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) an Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2026-56685 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2026-56686 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2026-59909 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) a Path Traversal vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. | |||||
| CVE-2026-59910 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2026-59911 | 1 Dell | 1 Objectscale | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Dell ObjectScale, versions prior to 4.3.0.1, contain(s) an Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in the svc_tools. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-21070 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in Samsung Message prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to access sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2026-21073 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in Galaxy Themes prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to launch arbitrary activity. | |||||
| CVE-2026-21058 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Improper input validation in Samsung Contacts prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to delete file with Samsung Contacts' privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2026-21059 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Improper export of android application components in Samsung Contacts prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to delete file with Samsung Contacts' privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2026-21060 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in Samsung Contacts prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows physical attackers to access data across multiple user profiles. | |||||