Total
3985 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27188 | 1 Adobe | 3 Commerce, Commerce B2b, Magento | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-p4, 2.4.6-p9, 2.4.5-p11, 2.4.4-p12, 2.4.8-beta2 and earlier are affected by an Improper Authorization vulnerability that could result in Privilege escalation. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2025-27138 | 1 Dataease | 1 Dataease | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| DataEase is an open source business intelligence and data visualization tool. Prior to version 2.10.6, there is a flaw in the authentication in the io.dataease.auth.filter.TokenFilter class, which may cause the risk of unauthorized access. The vulnerability has been fixed in v2.10.6. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2025-27089 | 1 Monospace | 1 Directus | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. In affected versions if there are two overlapping policies for the `update` action that allow access to different fields, instead of correctly checking access permissions against the item they apply for the user is allowed to update the superset of fields allowed by any of the policies. E.g. have one policy allowing update access to `field_a` if the `id == 1` and one policy allowing update access to `field_b` if the `id == 2`. The user with both these policies is allowed to update both `field_a` and `field_b` for the items with ids `1` and `2`. Before v11, if a user was allowed to update an item they were allowed to update the fields that the single permission, that applied to that item, listed. With overlapping permissions this isn't as clear cut anymore and the union of fields might not be the fields the user is allowed to update for that specific item. The solution that this PR introduces is to evaluate the permissions for each field that the user tries to update in the validateItemAccess DB query, instead of only verifying access to the item as a whole. This is done by, instead of returning the actual field value, returning a flag that indicates if the user has access to that field. This uses the same case/when mechanism that is used for stripping out non permitted field that is at the core of the permissions engine. As a result, for every item that the access is validated for, the expected result is an item that has either 1 or null for all the "requested" fields instead of any of the actual field values. These results are not useful for anything other than verifying the field level access permissions. The final check in validateItemAccess can either fail if the number of items does not match the number of items the access is checked for (ie. the user does not have access to the item at all) or if not all of the passed in fields have access permissions for any of the returned items. This is a vulnerability that allows update access to unintended fields, potentially impacting the password field for user accounts. This has been addressed in version 11.1.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26853 | 1 Descor | 1 Infocad | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| DESCOR INFOCAD 3.5.1 and before and fixed in v.3.5.2.0 has a broken authorization schema. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26850 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.3 CRITICAL | ||
| The agent in Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) before 14.0.97 and 14.1.x before 14.1.19 potentially allows privilege escalation on managed systems. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26842 | 1 Znuny | 1 Znuny | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Znuny through 7.1.3. If access to a ticket is not given, the content of S/MIME encrypted e-mail messages is visible to users with access to the CommunicationLog. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26532 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| Additional checks were required to ensure trusttext is applied (when enabled) to glossary entries being restored. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26531 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| Insufficient capability checks made it possible to disable badges a user does not have permission to access. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26526 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Separate Groups mode restrictions were not factored into permission checks before allowing viewing or deletion of responses in Feedback activities. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26511 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| Systems running the Instaclustr fork of Stratio's Cassandra-Lucene-Index plugin versions 4.0-rc1-1.0.0 through 4.0.16-1.0.0 and 4.1.2-1.0.0 through 4.1.8-1.0.0, installed into Apache Cassandra version 4.x, are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow authenticated Cassandra users to remotely bypass RBAC and escalate their privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26442 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In onCreate of NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity.java, there is a possible incorrect verification of proper intent filters in NLS due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26436 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In clearAllowBgActivityStarts of PendingIntentRecord.java, there is a possible way for an application to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26330 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.4.0.0 through 9.10.0.1, contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability to access the cluster with previous privileges of a disabled user account. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25274 | 1 Mattermost | 1 Mattermost Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Mattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.2, 10.3.x <= 10.3.3, 9.11.x <= 9.11.8 fail to restrict command execution in archived channels, which allows authenticated users to run commands in archived channels. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25251 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An Incorrect Authorization vulnerability [CWE-863] in FortiClient Mac 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14 may allow a local attacker to escalate privileges via crafted XPC messages. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25040 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.3 LOW | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in the port ACL functionality of AOS-CX software running on the HPE Aruba Networking CX 9300 Switch Series only and affects: - AOS-CX 10.14.xxxx : All patches - AOS-CX 10.15.xxxx : 10.15.1000 and below The vulnerability is specific to traffic originated by the CX 9300 switch platform and could allow an attacker to bypass ACL rules applied to routed ports on egress. As a result, port ACLs are not correctly enforced, which could lead to unauthorized traffic flow and violations of security policies. Egress VLAN ACLs and Routed VLAN ACLs are not affected by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25026 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information due to an incorrect authentication check. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25010 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Incorrect authorization in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via the built-in reporting_user role which incorrectly has the ability to access all Kibana Spaces. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24920 | 1 Mattermost | 1 Mattermost Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Mattermost versions 10.4.x <= 10.4.2, 10.3.x <= 10.3.3, 9.11.x <= 9.11.8, 10.5.x <= 10.5.0 fail to restrict bookmark creation and updates in archived channels, which allows authenticated users created or update bookmarked in archived channels | |||||
| CVE-2025-24872 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The ABAP Build Framework in SAP ABAP Platform allows an authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to a specific transaction. By executing the add-on build functionality within the ABAP Build Framework, an attacker could call the transaction and view its details. This has a limited impact on the confidentiality of the application with no effect on the integrity and availability of the application. | |||||