Total
3983 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62487 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.5 LOW | ||
| On October 1, 2025, Palantir discovered that images uploaded through the Dossier front-end app were not being marked correctly with the proper security levels. The regression was traced back to a change in May 2025, which was meant to allow file uploads to be shared among different artifacts (e.g. other dossiers and presentations). On deployments configured with CBAC, the front-end would present a security picker dialog to set the security level on the uploads, thereby mitigating the issue. On deployments without a CBAC configuration, no security picker dialog appears, leading to a security level of CUSTOM with no markings or datasets selected. The resulting markings and groups for the file uploads thus will be only those added by the default authorization rules defined in the Auth Chooser configuration. On most environments, it is expected that the default authorization rules only add the Everyone group. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62394 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Moodle failed to verify enrolment status correctly when sending quiz notifications. As a result, suspended or inactive users might receive quiz-related messages, leaking limited course information. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62275 | 1 Liferay | 2 Digital Experience Platform, Liferay Portal | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Blogs in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions does not check permission of images in a blog entry, which allows remote attackers to view the images in a blog entry via crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62259 | 1 Liferay | 2 Digital Experience Platform, Liferay Portal | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.109, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit access to APIs before a user has verified their email address, which allows remote users to access and edit content via the API. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62243 | 1 Liferay | 2 Digital Experience Platform, Liferay Portal | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Publications in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote authenticated attackers to view publication comments via the _com_liferay_change_tracking_web_portlet_PublicationsPortlet_value parameter. Publications comments in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92 does not properly check user permissions, which allows remote authenticated users to edit publication comments via crafted URLs. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62189 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Secuavail | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Logstare Collector | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| LogStare Collector contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in UserRegistration. If exploited, a non-administrative user may create a new user account by sending a crafted HTTP request. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61830 | 1 Adobe | 1 Pass Authentication | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Adobe Pass versions 3.7.3 and earlier are affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must install a malicious SDK. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61781 | 1 Citeum | 1 Opencti | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| OpenCTI is an open source platform for managing cyber threat intelligence knowledge and observables. Prior to version 6.8.1, the GraphQL mutation "WorkspacePopoverDeletionMutation" allows users to delete workspace-related objects such as dashboards and investigation cases. However, the mutation lacks proper authorization checks to verify ownership of the targeted resources. An attacker can exploit this by supplying an active UUID of another user. Since the API does not validate whether the requester owns the resource, the mutation executes successfully, resulting in unauthorized deletion of the entire workspace. Version 6.8.1 fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-5822 | 1 Autel | 18 Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50, Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware, Maxicharger Ac Pro and 15 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial Technician API Incorrect Authorization Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial charging stations. An attacker must first obtain a low-privileged authorization token in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the Autel Technician API. The issue results from incorrect authorization. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges to resources normally protected from the user. Was ZDI-CAN-26325. | |||||
| CVE-2025-5199 | 2 Apple, Canonical | 2 Macos, Multipass | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| In Canonical Multipass up to and including version 1.15.1 on macOS, incorrect default permissions allow a local attacker to escalate privileges by modifying files executed with administrative privileges by a Launch Daemon during system startup. | |||||
| CVE-2025-5187 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability exists in the NodeRestriction admission controller in Kubernetes clusters where node users can delete their corresponding node object by patching themselves with an OwnerReference to a cluster-scoped resource. If the OwnerReference resource does not exist or is subsequently deleted, the given node object will be deleted via garbage collection. | |||||
| CVE-2025-5071 | 1 Meowapps | 1 Ai Engine | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data and loss of data due to a missing capability check on the 'Meow_MWAI_Labs_MCP::can_access_mcp' function in versions 2.8.0 to 2.8.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to have full access to the MCP and run various commands like 'wp_create_user', 'wp_update_user' and 'wp_update_option', which can be used for privilege escalation, and 'wp_update_post', 'wp_delete_post', 'wp_update_comment' and 'wp_delete_comment', which can be used to edit and delete posts and comments. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59824 | 1 Siderolabs | 1 Omni | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Omni manages Kubernetes on bare metal, virtual machines, or in a cloud. Prior to version 0.48.0, Omni Wireguard SideroLink has the potential to escape. Omni and each Talos machine establish a peer-to-peer (P2P) SideroLink connection using WireGuard to mutually authenticate and authorize access. The WireGuard interface on Omni is configured to ensure that the source IP address of an incoming packet matches the IPv6 address assigned to the Talos peer. However, it performs no validation on the packet's destination address. The Talos end of the SideroLink connection cannot be considered a trusted environment. Workloads running on Kubernetes, especially those configured with host networking, could gain direct access to this link. Therefore, a malicious workload could theoretically send arbitrary packets over the SideroLink interface. This issue has been patched in version 0.48.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59714 | 1 Internet2 | 1 Grouper | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Internet2 Grouper 5.17.1 before 5.20.5, group admins who are not Grouper sysadmins can configure loader jobs. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59683 | 1 Pexip | 1 Pexip Infinity | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| Pexip Infinity 15.0 through 38.0 before 38.1 has Improper Access Control in the Secure Scheduler for Exchange service, when used with Office 365 Legacy Exchange Tokens. This allows a remote attacker to read potentially sensitive data and excessively consume resources, leading to a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59451 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.5 LOW | ||
| The YoSmart YoLink application through 2025-10-02 has session tokens with unexpectedly long lifetimes. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59449 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| The YoSmart YoLink MQTT broker through 2025-10-02 does not enforce sufficient authorization controls to prevent cross-account attacks, allowing an attacker to remotely operate affected devices if the attacker obtains the associated device IDs. Because YoLink device IDs are predictable, an attacker can exploit this to gain full control over any other YoLink user's devices. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59420 | 1 Authlib | 1 Authlib | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.4, Authlib’s JWS verification accepts tokens that declare unknown critical header parameters (crit), violating RFC 7515 “must‑understand” semantics. An attacker can craft a signed token with a critical header (for example, bork or cnf) that strict verifiers reject but Authlib accepts. In mixed‑language fleets, this enables split‑brain verification and can lead to policy bypass, replay, or privilege escalation. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.4. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59376 | 1 Feisky | 1 Mcp-kubernetes-server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| feiskyer mcp-kubernetes-server through 0.1.11 does not consider chained commands in the implementation of --disable-write and --disable-delete, e.g., it allows a "kubectl version; kubectl delete pod" command because the first word (i.e., "version") is not a write or delete operation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59111 | 1 Windu | 1 Windu Cms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Windu CMS is vulnerable to Broken Access Control in user editing functionality. Malicious attacker can send a GET request which allows privileged users to delete Super Admins which is not possible with GUI. Only version 4.1 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable. This issue was fixed in version 4.1 build 2250. | |||||