Total
815 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-11292 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11282 | 2 Google, Linux | 2 Chrome, Linux Kernel | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Sandbox in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11260 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11263 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in WebAuthentication in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11266 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in SafeBrowsing in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass Safe Browsing via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11206 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in ServiceWorker in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11170 | 2 Google, Linux | 2 Chrome, Linux Kernel | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in Chromoting in Google Chrome on Linux prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to perform OS-level privilege escalation via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11288 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in CSS in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-16406 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Mitigation bypass in the Networking component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153 and Thunderbird 153. | |||||
| CVE-2026-16394 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153 and Thunderbird 153. | |||||
| CVE-2026-10950 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Autofill in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2025-52609 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Icontrol | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| HCL iControl was affected by Missing Security Headers vulnerability. which lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks by enabling the built-in XSS filtering mechanisms of modern web browsers. | |||||
| CVE-2026-10944 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in Autofill in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2026-0077 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In resumeConfigurationDispatch of ActivityRecord.java, there is a possible background application launch (bal) due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0087 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In approvalLevelForDomainInternal of DomainVerificationService.java, there is a possible way to hijack an arbitrary app link due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0097 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass user interaction when pairing an LE device due to a logic error. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-34348 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows Event Logging Service allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-50661 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 8 more | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows BitLocker allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature with a physical attack. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48649 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to reset user-selected permissions selections due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0045 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In bta_jv_rfcomm_connect of bta_jv_act.cc, there is a possible bypass of bonding for a secure connection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||