Total
2676 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-52906 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Vios | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM AIX 7.2, 7.3, VIOS 3.1, and 4.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in the TCP/IP kernel extension to cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2024-51515 | 1 Huawei | 1 Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| Race condition vulnerability in the kernel network module Impact:Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-51505 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH | ||
| An issue was discovered in Atos Eviden IDRA before 2.7.1. A highly trusted role (Config Admin) could leverage a race condition to escalate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-50313 | 1 Mendix | 1 Mendix | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix Runtime V10 (All versions < V10.16.0 only if the basic authentication mechanism is used by the application), Mendix Runtime V10.12 (All versions < V10.12.7 only if the basic authentication mechanism is used by the application), Mendix Runtime V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.15 only if the basic authentication mechanism is used by the application), Mendix Runtime V8 (All versions only if the basic authentication mechanism is used by the application), Mendix Runtime V9 (All versions < V9.24.29 only if the basic authentication mechanism is used by the application). The basic authentication implementation of affected applications contains a race condition vulnerability which could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to circumvent default account lockout measures. | |||||
| CVE-2024-50183 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: lpfc: Ensure DA_ID handling completion before deleting an NPIV instance Deleting an NPIV instance requires all fabric ndlps to be released before an NPIV's resources can be torn down. Failure to release fabric ndlps beforehand opens kref imbalance race conditions. Fix by forcing the DA_ID to complete synchronously with usage of wait_queue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-50135 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-pci: fix race condition between reset and nvme_dev_disable() nvme_dev_disable() modifies the dev->online_queues field, therefore nvme_pci_update_nr_queues() should avoid racing against it, otherwise we could end up passing invalid values to blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(). WARNING: CPU: 39 PID: 61303 at drivers/pci/msi/api.c:347 pci_irq_get_affinity+0x187/0x210 Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [nvme] RIP: 0010:pci_irq_get_affinity+0x187/0x210 Call Trace: <TASK> ? blk_mq_pci_map_queues+0x87/0x3c0 ? pci_irq_get_affinity+0x187/0x210 blk_mq_pci_map_queues+0x87/0x3c0 nvme_pci_map_queues+0x189/0x460 [nvme] blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x2a/0x40 nvme_reset_work+0x1be/0x2a0 [nvme] Fix the bug by locking the shutdown_lock mutex before using dev->online_queues. Give up if nvme_dev_disable() is running or if it has been executed already. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49872 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/gup: fix memfd_pin_folios alloc race panic If memfd_pin_folios tries to create a hugetlb page, but someone else already did, then folio gets the value -EEXIST here: folio = memfd_alloc_folio(memfd, start_idx); if (IS_ERR(folio)) { ret = PTR_ERR(folio); if (ret != -EEXIST) goto err; then on the next trip through the "while start_idx" loop we panic here: if (folio) { folio_put(folio); To fix, set the folio to NULL on error. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49353 | 1 Ibm | 1 Watson Assistant For Ibm Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Watson Speech Services Cartridge for IBM Cloud Pak for Data 4.0.0 through 5.0.2 does not properly check inputs to resources that are used concurrently, which might lead to unexpected states, possibly resulting in a crash. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49132 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49129 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) Denial of Service Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49128 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Sensitive data storage in improperly locked memory in Windows Remote Desktop Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49127 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49126 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49124 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49123 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49122 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49120 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49119 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49118 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-49116 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
