Total
9688 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-47000 | 1 Oracle | 1 Enterprise Manager Base Platform | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform product of Oracle Enterprise Manager (component: Security Framework). The supported version that is affected is 24.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.5 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2026-61253 | 1 Oracle | 1 Human Resources Management System | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle HRMS (Japanese) product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Oracle Payroll Japanese). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle HRMS (Japanese). Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle HRMS (Japanese) accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle HRMS (Japanese) accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2026-20296 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.1, 10.2.5, 10.0.8, and 9.4.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.5.2605.0, 10.4.2604.7, 10.3.2512.16, 10.2.2510.18, and 10.1.2507.24, an attacker could trick a user that holds a role with the `list_deployment_server` capability into running arbitrary Search Processing Language (SPL) searches on their behalf as `splunk-system-user`, allowing for access to stored credentials and indexed data.<br><br>The vulnerability is possible because Deployment Server endpoints in Splunk Web do not validate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) tokens on GET requests, and caller-supplied input is not correctly neutralized before it is placed into an SPL search. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9582 | 2026-07-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester CET Automated Grading System with AI Predictive Analytics 1.0. This affects an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-46620 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5. | |||||
| CVE-2026-58315 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in SEIKO EPSON Web Config. If a user views a malicious page while logged into Web Config, unintended operations may be performed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-24554 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Convers Lab WPSubscription allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WPSubscription: from n/a through 1.9.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-24597 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WpDevArt Organization chart allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Organization chart: from n/a through 1.7.5. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11954 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH | ||
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sitemio Information Technologies Trade Ltd. Co. WISECP allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WISECP: through 20022026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-24574 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Recorp Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Export WP Page to Static HTML/CSS: from n/a through 6.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-39436 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bgermann CformsII allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects CformsII: from n/a through 15.1.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5624 | 2026-07-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A security flaw has been discovered in ProjectSend r2002. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file upload.php. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. Upgrading to version r2029 is able to resolve this issue. The patch is named 2c0d25824ab571b6c219ac1a188ad9350149661b. You should upgrade the affected component. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5918 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-8194 | 2026-07-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A security vulnerability has been detected in osTicket up to 1.18.3. Impacted is an unknown function of the file include/class.dispatcher.php of the component Dispatcher. The manipulation of the argument _method leads to cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a pull request but has not reacted yet. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6452 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Bigfishgames Syndicate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bigfishgames_syndicate_submenu() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset plugin settings and update them via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6391 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Sentence To SEO (keywords, description and tags) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the create_admin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts and update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6395 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Word 2 Cash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to and including 0.9.2. This is due to the complete absence of nonce verification on the settings save handler in the w2c_admin() function, combined with missing input sanitization before storage and missing output escaping when rendering the stored value. The w2c-definitions POST parameter is saved raw via update_option() and later echoed without escaping inside a <textarea> element. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to forge a request on behalf of a logged-in administrator, storing arbitrary JavaScript payloads that execute in the WordPress admin panel whenever the settings page is visited. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6400 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Child Height Predictor by Ostheimer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 1.3. This is due to missing nonce verification in the options() function, which handles plugin settings updates. The form template does not include a wp_nonce_field() call, and the handler never calls check_admin_referer() or wp_verify_nonce(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a link or visiting a malicious page that submits a forged POST request, causing unauthorized changes to the plugin settings such as unit preferences to be persisted to the database via update_option(). | |||||
| CVE-2026-6401 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Bottom Bar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 0.1.7. This is due to missing nonce verification on the plugin's settings update forms handled in bottom-bar-admin.php. None of the three settings forms (main settings, sharing services, restore defaults) include a wp_nonce_field(), and the server-side processing code never calls check_admin_referer() or any equivalent nonce validation before processing POST data and calling update_option(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a logged-in administrator into submitting a crafted request that updates plugin configuration options, such as changing the language, maximum post counts, or enabled sharing services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6405 | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Anomify AI – Anomaly Detection and Alerting plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in versions up to and including 0.3.6. This is due to missing nonce verification on the settings page handler and insufficient output escaping in the admin_options.php template. The settings form includes no wp_nonce_field() and the handler performs no check_admin_referer() check, meaning any cross-origin POST can modify plugin settings. The API key field is sanitized only with sanitize_text_field(), which strips HTML tags but does not encode double-quote characters; the value is then rendered into an HTML attribute via bare echo without esc_attr(), allowing a double-quote attribute-escape payload to survive both sanitization and storage. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts by tricking a logged-in administrator into visiting a malicious page that submits a forged request, storing the payload in the database and causing it to execute in the administrator's browser whenever the plugin settings page is visited. | |||||