Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by CWE-352
Total 9889 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2025-14163 1 Leap13 1 Premium Addons For Elementor 2026-10-19 N/A 4.3 MEDIUM
The Premium Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.11.53. This is due to missing nonce validation in the 'insert_inner_template' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary Elementor templates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator or other user with the edit_posts capability into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-13361 2026-10-19 N/A 4.3 MEDIUM
The Web to SugarCRM Lead plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the custom field deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete custom fields via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-62107 2026-10-19 N/A 4.3 MEDIUM
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in PluginOps Feather Login Page feather-login-page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Feather Login Page: from n/a through <= 1.1.7.
CVE-2026-104627 2026-10-19 N/A 5.4 MEDIUM
The Gitea OpenID association callback in the security settings accepted a positive OpenID 2.0 assertion without checking that the signed-in user had started the linking. Because OpenID 2.0 allows unsolicited assertions, an attacker-controlled OpenID provider could attach the attacker's identity to the account of a signed-in victim who opened a crafted link, and the attacker could then sign in as the victim through OpenID login, which does not apply the local TOTP or WebAuthn checks. The callback now requires a time-limited `state` value bound to the user.
CVE-2026-112050 2026-10-19 N/A 3.1 LOW
Gitify before 7.10.0 contains a login cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to bind a victim's client to their account because performGitHubWebOAuth() omits OAuth state validation. Attackers can get a gitify://oauth?code= link with their own authorization code opened during a victim's pending login, causing Gitify to display attacker-controlled notifications as the victim's own.
CVE-2026-110008 2026-10-19 N/A 4.2 MEDIUM
@fastify/oauth2 is a Fastify wrapper for OAuth2 login flows. In versions 7.2.0 through 8.3.1, the state and code-verifier cookies are set without a Path attribute at a login route with two or more path segments, while the clearing step at the OAuth callback writes them with a root path, so the original cookies survive the callback and the documented single-use guarantee for the state value does not hold. A state value an attacker learns stays valid for the rest of the browser session, letting the attacker drive their own authorization flow in the victim's browser and sign the victim in to the attacker's account (login CSRF). The issue is fixed in @fastify/oauth2 8.3.2, and users should upgrade to 8.3.2 or later. As a workaround, set an explicit cookie path so the set and the clear name the same cookie.
CVE-2026-92433 2026-10-19 N/A 6.5 MEDIUM
The Patreon WordPress plugin before 1.10.0 does not verify a nonce when connecting the site to a Patreon account, allowing attackers to make a logged-in administrator re-link the integration to an attacker-controlled account via a crafted request (CSRF), taking over the site's Patreon integration.
CVE-2026-84178 2026-10-19 N/A 6.1 MEDIUM
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel OAuth component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The authorization code callback did not carry a state parameter binding it to the authorization request that started the flow, and the callback did not verify one. An authorization code obtained in any browser could therefore be redeemed at the callback and associated with whichever session presented it, which is login cross-site request forgery: a victim can be silently signed in as an identity the attacker controls, so that actions the victim then performs, and data they then submit, land in the attacker's account. The same unvalidated callback handling also allowed the post-authentication redirect target to be influenced, giving an open redirect from a trusted origin. The state check runs before the authorization code is redeemed, so these paths are reachable without any interaction with the identity provider. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The authorization request now issues a state value bound to the session, and the callback rejects a request whose state is absent or does not match, stopping the route with a 400 response. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, terminate the authorization code flow in a component that performs its own state binding rather than relying on the Camel callback. Note that after upgrading, a deployment behind a proxy that drops or rewrites the callback query string will begin to see 400 responses, because the state parameter must survive the round trip.
CVE-2026-63000 1 Redaxo 1 Redaxo 2026-10-19 N/A 6.4 MEDIUM
REDAXO is a PHP-based content management system. Prior to 5.21.2, rex_api_install_package_update in redaxo/src/addons/install/lib/api/api_package_update.php inherits the false default from rex_api_function::requiresCsrfProtection() instead of requiring a CSRF token. An unauthenticated attacker can cause a logged-in administrator's browser to request a selected package update from the configured REDAXO package server, changing installed addon code or disrupting the site without the administrator's intent. This issue is fixed in version 5.21.2.
CVE-2026-106708 2026-10-19 N/A 8.8 HIGH
XXL-JOB 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT and earlier contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the user management controller (JobUserController). The endpoints /user/insert, /user/update, and /user/delete lack CSRF protection and do not restrict HTTP method.
CVE-2026-112033 2026-10-19 5.0 MEDIUM 4.3 MEDIUM
A security flaw has been discovered in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.16. The affected element is the function admin_repwd/admin_repwd_act of the file controllers/system.php of the component Password Change. The manipulation of the argument password/repassword results in cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-111988 2026-10-19 5.0 MEDIUM 4.3 MEDIUM
A security flaw has been discovered in dyad-sh dyad up to 1.16.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component OAuth Callback Handler. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.17.0-beta.1 can resolve this issue. The patch is named 39fbae87b38573616a1a3b152cdb292787bb1109. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.
CVE-2026-111907 2026-10-19 N/A 7.1 HIGH
phpMyFAQ 4.0.0 before 4.1.9 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the POST /admin/api/update-database endpoint, which executes database migrations without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in user with the CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission into submitting a crafted cross-site request, triggering migrations that may impact database integrity or availability.
CVE-2025-9747 1 Benjaminjonard 1 Koillection 2026-10-19 5.0 MEDIUM 4.3 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been found in Koillection up to 1.6.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file assets/controllers/csrf_protection_controller.js. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.7.0 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 9ab8562d3f1e953da93fed63f9ee802c7ea26a9a. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. The vendor explains: "I ended up switching to a newer CSRF handling using stateless token."
CVE-2025-9213 2026-10-19 N/A 8.8 HIGH
The TextBuilder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 1.0.0 to 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'handleToken' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's authorization token via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Once the token is updated, an attacker can update the user's password and email address.
CVE-2025-58611 2026-10-19 N/A 4.3 MEDIUM
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tickera Tickera tickera-event-ticketing-system allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Tickera: from n/a through <= 3.5.5.6.
CVE-2025-49373 2026-10-19 N/A 4.3 MEDIUM
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Evergreen Content Poster Evergreen Content Poster evergreen-content-poster allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Evergreen Content Poster: from n/a through <= 1.4.5.
CVE-2025-61930 1 Emlog 1 Emlog 2026-10-19 N/A 8.1 HIGH
Emlog is an open source website building system. Emlog Pro versions 2.5.19 and earlier are vulnerable to Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on the password change endpoint. An attacker can trick a logged‑in administrator into submitting a crafted POST request to change the admin password without consent. Impact is account takeover of privileged users. Severity: High. As of time of publication, no known patched versions exist.
CVE-2025-59428 1 Espocrm 1 Espocrm 2026-10-19 N/A 5.4 MEDIUM
EspoCRM is an open source customer relationship management application. In versions before 9.1.9, a vulnerability allows arbitrary user creation, including administrative accounts, through a combination of stored SVG injection and lack of CSRF protection. An attacker with Knowledge Base edit permissions can embed a malicious SVG element containing a link in the body field of an article. When an authenticated user clicks the malicious link, they are redirected to an attacker-controlled HTML page that executes a CSRF request against the api/v1/User endpoint. If the victim is prompted for and enters their credentials, an attacker-controlled account is created with privileges determined by the CSRF payload. This issue has been patched in version 9.1.9.
CVE-2025-62975 2026-10-19 N/A 4.3 MEDIUM
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in raychat Raychat raychat allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Raychat: from n/a through <= 2.2.1.