Total
1717 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-74774 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerprotect One | 2026-08-28 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66404 | 2026-08-28 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| DEEBOT PRO M1 and DEEBOT PRO K1VAC do not validate server certificates in MQTT communications. Operation logs and activity logs stored on the affected products may be retrieved. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66406 | 2026-08-28 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM | ||
| DEEBOT PRO M1 and DEEBOT PRO K1VAC use wget command with server certificate validation disabled. A man-in-the-middle attack may allow to obtain and/or alter communications of the affected products. As a result, arbitrary code may be executed with the administrative privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66410 | 2026-08-28 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM | ||
| Android and iOS apps ECOVACS PRO App improperly validate server certificates. Communication may be retrieved and/or altered. | |||||
| CVE-2026-48437 | 1 Adobe | 3 C2pa, C2pa-web, C2patool | 2026-08-28 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| CAI Content Credentials is affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. | |||||
| CVE-2026-27221 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 5 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 2 more | 2026-08-28 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30307, 24.001.30308, 25.001.21265 and earlier are affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to spoof the identity of a signer. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction. | |||||
| CVE-2026-44393 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack oslo.messaging 1.0.0 through 17.3.0. The oslo.messaging RabbitMQ driver does not perform TLS hostname verification when connecting to the message broker. When ssl_ca_file is configured, the driver enables certificate chain validation but does not pass the expected broker hostname into the underlying TLS stack. Any certificate signed by the deployment CA is accepted regardless of hostname, allowing an attacker who can intercept control-plane traffic to impersonate the RabbitMQ broker and perform a man-in-the-middle attack on RPC and notification traffic. All OpenStack services using oslo.messaging with RabbitMQ over TLS are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-54481 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Internal API HTTP client hardcodes InsecureSkipVerify:true with no config override (CWE-295) | |||||
| CVE-2026-16835 | 1 Ibm | 18 Power System E1080 \(9080-hex\), Power System E1080 \(9080-hex\) Firmware, Power System E1180 \(9080-heu\) and 15 more | 2026-08-25 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the FSP management network protocol. An unauthenticated attacker on the management network can bypass authentication and perform any administrative operation on the managed system, including control of partition power state, configuration, and console access across all hosted partitions, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76403 | 1 Splunk | 1 Connect For Kafka | 2026-08-24 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| In Splunk Connect for Kafka versions below 2.2.7, an unauthenticated user positioned in the network path could read or alter all relevant data sent from the connector when Kerberos authentication is used with Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Event Collector in Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Kerberos authentication path does not apply the configured certificate validation options when it builds the HTTP client. For more information see Install Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/install/install-splunk-connect-for-kafka), Security configurations for Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/get-data-in/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/configure/security-configurations-for-splunk-connect-for-kafka), and Set up and use HTTP Event Collector with configuration files (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/get-data-in/get-started-with-getting-data-in/9.4/get-data-with-http-event-collector/set-up-and-use-http-event-collector-with-configuration-files) in the Splunk documentation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76362 | 1 Splunk | 1 Soar | 2026-08-21 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| In Splunk SOAR versions below 8.6.0, an unauthenticated user who can observe or alter network traffic between Splunk SOAR and a configured CyberArk Representational State Transfer (REST) server could access or modify all relevant data exchanged through that credential manager. The vulnerability is possible because the CyberArk REST client does not verify server certificates by default. The attack requires the attacker to have network-path interception capability between Splunk SOAR and the configured CyberArk REST server. For more information see Manage your organization's credentials with a password vault (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/administer-soar-cloud/configure-administration-settings-in-splunk-soar-cloud/manage-your-organizations-credentials-with-a-password-vault) in the Splunk documentation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2368 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Filez | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Filez application that could allow a user capable of intercepting network traffic to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2026-1068 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Filez | 2026-08-19 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Filez application that could allow a user capable of intercepting network traffic to obtain sensitive user data from the application. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1113 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2026-08-19 | 9.3 HIGH | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows when the Task Scheduler service fails to properly verify client connections over RPC. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code as an administrator. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, a man-in-the-middle attacker would need to send a specially crafted request to a vulnerable system. The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Task Scheduler service validates connections. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0227 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-08-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Virtual Private Network (VPN) Client Certificate Authentication feature for Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection and bypass certain SSL certificate verification steps. The vulnerability is due to incorrect verification of the SSL Client Certificate. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the ASA VPN without a proper private key and certificate pair. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to establish an SSL VPN connection to the ASA when the connection should have been rejected. This vulnerability affects Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliances (ISA), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliances (ASAv), Firepower 4110 Security Appliances, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Modules. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg40155. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18141 | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| A flaw was found in aap-gateway, a component of Ansible Automation Platform's Event-Driven Ansible (EDA). An unauthenticated remote attacker can bypass mutual Transport Layer Security (mTLS) authentication for event streams. This is achieved by manipulating the event stream URL and forging the HTTP Subject header. The system also inadvertently discloses the expected certificate subject in error messages, which simplifies the attack. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject arbitrary events into EDA, potentially triggering automated workflows. | |||||
| CVE-2026-56820 | 1 Netty | 1 Netty | 2026-07-30 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final. | |||||
| CVE-2026-32281 | 1 Golang | 1 Go | 2026-07-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33753 | 1 Trailofbits | 1 Rfc3161-client | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| rfc3161-client is a Python library implementing the Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) described in RFC 3161. Prior to 1.0.6, an Authorization Bypass vulnerability in rfc3161-client's signature verification allows any attacker to impersonate a trusted TimeStamping Authority (TSA). By exploiting a logic flaw in how the library extracts the leaf certificate from an unordered PKCS#7 bag of certificates, an attacker can append a spoofed certificate matching the target common_name and Extended Key Usage (EKU) requirements. This tricks the library into verifying these authorization rules against the forged certificate while validating the cryptographic signature against an actual trusted TSA (such as FreeTSA), thereby bypassing the intended TSA authorization pinning entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.6. | |||||
| CVE-2026-34580 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Botan is a C++ cryptography library. In 3.11.0, the function Certificate_Store::certificate_known had a misleading name; it would return true if any certificate in the store had a DN (and subject key identifier, if set) matching that of the argument. It did not check that the cert it found and the cert it was passed were actually the same certificate. In 3.11.0 an extension of path validation logic was made which assumed that certificate_known only returned true if the certificates were in fact identical. The impact is that if an end entity certificate is presented, and its DN (and subject key identifier, if set) match that of any trusted root, the end entity certificate is accepted immediately as if it itself were a trusted root. , This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.1. | |||||