Total
22 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-40880 | 1 Zfnd | 2 Zebra-consensus, Zebrad | 2026-10-26 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.2, a logic error in Zebra's transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By carefully submitting a transaction that is valid for height H+1 but invalid for H+2 and then mining that transaction in a block at height H+2, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. This vulnerability is fixed in zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-48860 | 1 Erlang | 2 Erlang\/otp, Erlang\/ssl | 2026-10-26 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Reliance on IP Address for Authentication vulnerability in Erlang/OTP ssl (inet_tls_dist module) allows unauthenticated bypass of the distribution-over-TLS LAN allowlist. The inet_tls_dist:check_ip/1 function, which enforces a LAN allowlist for Erlang distribution over TLS, calls inet:sockname/1 instead of inet:peername/1 to obtain the peer's IP address. Because inet:sockname/1 returns the local socket address, both the local IP and the supposed peer IP resolve to the same value, causing the subnet mask comparison to always succeed regardless of the actual remote address. Any holder of a CA-signed TLS certificate can therefore bypass the LAN restriction and gain full Erlang distribution access to the node, including rpc:call/4 and code:load_binary/3. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/ssl/src/inet_tls_dist.erl. This issue affects OTP from OTP 26.0 before OTP 27.3.4.13, OTP 28.5.0.2, and OTP 29.0.2, corresponding to ssl from 11.0 before 11.2.12.9, 11.6.0.2, and 11.7.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-114649 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| The MongoDB C# Driver compares TLS client certificates by issuer and serial number only when deciding whether two clients can share cached connections. In an application that creates clients from certificates supplied by different users, a user who provides a certificate copying another user's issuer and serial number, without that user's private key, can be given connections authenticated with the other user's certificate. Database operations can then run under the other user's identity, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of data that identity can access. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75840 | 2026-10-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| ArcadeDB before 26.8.1 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GraalVM JavaScript sandbox allowlist enforcement, which uses unescaped regular expressions to validate package names. Attackers with trigger creation privileges can use Java.type() to access java.util.zip.ZipFile or java.util.jar.JarFile classes and read arbitrary files on the host system as the ArcadeDB server process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9800 | 1 Redhat | 1 Build Of Keycloak | 2026-10-20 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak Policy Enforcer. This vulnerability allows any authenticated user to bypass all authorization policies, including role, scope, and User-Managed Access (UMA) permission checks. By including the configured access-denied page path within a request URL, either as a path segment or a query parameter, an attacker can gain unauthorized access to protected resources. | |||||
| CVE-2026-104048 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 3 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-09 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in SSSD. In trust-enabled identity management environments, SSSD evaluates Host-Based Access Control (HBAC) rules by stripping domain qualifiers and comparing only short usernames. An authenticated user in a trusted domain who shares the same username as an authorized local account can bypass access policies and gain unauthorized access to protected services or hosts. | |||||
| CVE-2023-54390 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| PocketMine-MP versions before 5.3.1 and 4.23.1 contain a denial of service vulnerability in LoginPacket JSON parsing due to improper null value handling in arrays. Attackers can send malformed JSON with unexpected null elements in LoginPacket to crash the server. | |||||
| CVE-2025-71377 | 2026-10-06 | N/A | N/A | ||
| stoatchat (delta) versions before 20250210-1 (0.8.2) contain a logic error in the query messages route. When fetching messages 'nearby' another message, the database query can be given a message limit of zero, which the database interprets as 'no limit'. A remote unauthenticated attacker can craft nearby message fetch requests to download an entire channel's message history in a single expensive request, and can send many such requests in parallel, resulting in denial of service through resource exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14441 | 2026-10-01 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A logic flaw in Java cache key handling object comparison handling could lead to improper identifier resolution when processing specific user account structures. The issue has been remediated by updating the internal comparison routines to ensure accurate object evaluation and prevent potential identity mismatch conditions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-100248 | 2026-09-30 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Rattadan Cosmowarp smart contract before 56c6147 can have a comparison to an unintended value of current_admin. | |||||
| CVE-2026-79677 | 2026-09-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Missing release of resource after effective lifetime, Comparison using wrong factors vulnerability in Apache Tomcat allows a denial of service as a result of lost time outs for asynchronous WebSocket writes. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.25, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.59, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.121. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: from 8.5.0 through 8.5.100, from 7.0.43 through 7.0.109. Other unsupported versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.26, 10.1.60 or 9.0.122, which fix the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-93854 | 2026-09-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In OpenStack Blazar before 17.0.1, the V2 lease API does not enforce object-level authorization on its update and delete operations (PUT /v2/leases/{lease_id} and DELETE /v2/leases/{lease_id}). The policy authorize() wrapper attempts to load the target lease to build the authorization target from its owner, but it looks up the lease under the keyword "lease_id" whereas the controller methods name the parameter "id" (and the wsme_pecan.wsexpose wrapper delivers it positionally). The lookup returns None, and thus authorization falls back to the requesting user's own project_id/user_id instead of the target lease owner. Any authenticated user who knows a lease ID can therefore modify or delete leases belonging to other users and projects, bypassing the intended ownership check. | |||||
| CVE-2026-29811 | 2026-09-16 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH | ||
| CyberPanel before 2.4.4 attempts to detect an "alais" domain (i.e., a second domain that serves the same content as a primary domain; normally spelled "alias") via an ORM query filter rather than a Python "if" statement. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78619 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Punk::Plugin::TOTP versions before 0.05 for Perl accept another account's recovery code at the two-factor challenge because totp_use_recovery compares user identifiers numerically. The helper searches the recovery model for the submitted code's digest alone, across every user's rows, so the ownership test that follows is the only thing binding a code to the account it was issued to. That test compares the row's user_id with the challenged user's id through Perl's integer coercion, and an identifier with no leading digits coerces to zero, so any two of them compare equal. User models keyed on a username, an email address or a UUID hit that case, and a numeric key compares as intended. The challenge route feeds a submitted value to the helper once TOTP verification fails, so an attacker who knows a victim's password and holds a recovery code of their own passes the victim's second factor. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20342 | 1 Cisco | 2 Secure Firewall Threat Defense, Snort | 2026-08-11 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the rate filtering feature of the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured rate limiting filter. This vulnerability is due to an incorrect connection count comparison. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic through an affected device at a rate that exceeds a configured rate filter. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to successfully bypass the rate filter. This could allow unintended traffic to enter the network protected by the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40227 | 1 Systemd Project | 1 Systemd | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In systemd 260 before 261, a local unprivileged user can trigger an assert via an IPC API call with an array or map that has a null element. | |||||
| CVE-2026-21691 | 1 Color | 1 Iccdev | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of International Color Consortium (ICC) color management profiles. Versions prior to 2.3.1.2 have a Type Confusion vulnerability in `CIccTag:IsTypeCompressed()`. This vulnerability affects users of the iccDEV library who process ICC color profiles. Version 2.3.1.2 contains a patch. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32464 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| HAProxy 2.2 through 3.1.6, in certain uncommon configurations, has a sample_conv_regsub heap-based buffer overflow because of mishandling of the replacement of multiple short patterns with a longer one. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2888 | 1 Amazon | 1 Tough | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.5 MEDIUM |
| During a snapshot rollback, the client incorrectly caches the timestamp metadata. If the client checks the cache when attempting to perform the next update, the update timestamp validation will fail, preventing the next update until the cache is cleared. Users should upgrade to tough version 0.20.0 or later and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2887 | 1 Amazon | 1 Tough | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.5 MEDIUM |
| During a target rollback, the client fails to detect the rollback for delegated targets. This could cause the client to fetch a target from an incorrect source, altering the target contents. Users should upgrade to tough version 0.20.0 or later and ensure any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes. | |||||