Total
402518 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-52435 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: prevent mss overflow in skb_segment() Once again syzbot is able to crash the kernel in skb_segment() [1] GSO_BY_FRAGS is a forbidden value, but unfortunately the following computation in skb_segment() can reach it quite easily : mss = mss * partial_segs; 65535 = 3 * 5 * 17 * 257, so many initial values of mss can lead to a bad final result. Make sure to limit segmentation so that the new mss value is smaller than GSO_BY_FRAGS. [1] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000e: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000070-0x0000000000000077] CPU: 1 PID: 5079 Comm: syz-executor993 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00141-g1ae4cd3cbdd0 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x181d/0x3f30 net/core/skbuff.c:4551 Code: 83 e3 02 e9 fb ed ff ff e8 90 68 1c f9 48 8b 84 24 f8 00 00 00 48 8d 78 70 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e 8a 21 00 00 48 8b 84 24 f8 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900043473d0 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000010046 RCX: ffffffff886b1597 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffffffff886b2520 RDI: 0000000000000070 RBP: ffffc90004347578 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 000000000000ffff R10: 000000000000ffff R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888063202ac0 R13: 0000000000010000 R14: 000000000000ffff R15: 0000000000000046 FS: 0000555556e7e380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020010000 CR3: 0000000027ee2000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> udp6_ufo_fragment+0xa0e/0xd00 net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:109 ipv6_gso_segment+0x534/0x17e0 net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:120 skb_mac_gso_segment+0x290/0x610 net/core/gso.c:53 __skb_gso_segment+0x339/0x710 net/core/gso.c:124 skb_gso_segment include/net/gso.h:83 [inline] validate_xmit_skb+0x36c/0xeb0 net/core/dev.c:3626 __dev_queue_xmit+0x6f3/0x3d60 net/core/dev.c:4338 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3134 [inline] packet_xmit+0x257/0x380 net/packet/af_packet.c:276 packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3087 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x24c6/0x5220 net/packet/af_packet.c:3119 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x180 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x255/0x340 net/socket.c:2190 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2202 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2198 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2198 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7f8692032aa9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 d1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fff8d685418 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f8692032aa9 RDX: 0000000000010048 RSI: 00000000200000c0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000000f4240 R08: 0000000020000540 R09: 0000000000000014 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff8d685480 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007fff8d685480 R15: 0000000000000003 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:skb_segment+0x181d/0x3f30 net/core/skbuff.c:4551 Code: 83 e3 02 e9 fb ed ff ff e8 90 68 1c f9 48 8b 84 24 f8 00 00 00 48 8d 78 70 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 08 3c 03 0f 8e 8a 21 00 00 48 8b 84 24 f8 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900043473d0 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000010046 RCX: ffffffff886b1597 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffffffff886b2520 RDI: 0000000000000070 RBP: ffffc90004347578 R0 ---truncated--- | |||||
| CVE-2023-52432 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in IpcTxSndSetLoopbackCtrl in libsec-ril prior to SMR Sep-2023 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52431 | 1 Plack\ | 1 \ | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Plack::Middleware::XSRFBlock package before 0.0.19 for Perl allows attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism via an empty form value and an empty cookie (if signed cookies are disabled). | |||||
| CVE-2023-52430 | 1 Authcrunch | 1 Caddy-security | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The caddy-security plugin 1.1.20 for Caddy allows reflected XSS via a GET request to a URL that contains an XSS payload and begins with either a /admin or /settings/mfa/delete/ substring. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52429 | 2 Fedoraproject, Linux | 2 Fedora, Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| dm_table_create in drivers/md/dm-table.c in the Linux kernel through 6.7.4 can attempt to (in alloc_targets) allocate more than INT_MAX bytes, and crash, because of a missing check for struct dm_ioctl.target_count. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52428 | 1 Connect2id | 1 Nimbus Jose\+jwt | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Connect2id Nimbus JOSE+JWT before 9.37.2, an attacker can cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a large JWE p2c header value (aka iteration count) for the PasswordBasedDecrypter (PBKDF2) component. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52427 | 1 Objectcomputing | 1 Opendds | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In OpenDDS through 3.27, there is a segmentation fault for a DataWriter with a large value of resource_limits.max_samples. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the product is not designed to handle a max_samples value that is too large for the amount of memory on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52426 | 1 Libexpat Project | 1 Libexpat | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| libexpat through 2.5.0 allows recursive XML Entity Expansion if XML_DTD is undefined at compile time. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52425 | 1 Libexpat Project | 1 Libexpat | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| libexpat through 2.5.0 allows a denial of service (resource consumption) because many full reparsings are required in the case of a large token for which multiple buffer fills are needed. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52424 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| The IEEE 802.11 standard sometimes enables an adversary to trick a victim into connecting to an unintended or untrusted network with Home WEP, Home WPA3 SAE-loop. Enterprise 802.1X/EAP, Mesh AMPE, or FILS, aka an "SSID Confusion" issue. This occurs because the SSID is not always used to derive the pairwise master key or session keys, and because there is not a protected exchange of an SSID during a 4-way handshake. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52389 | 1 Pocoproject | 1 Poco | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| UTF32Encoding.cpp in POCO has a Poco::UTF32Encoding integer overflow and resultant stack buffer overflow because Poco::UTF32Encoding::convert() and Poco::UTF32::queryConvert() may return a negative integer if a UTF-32 byte sequence evaluates to a value of 0x80000000 or higher. This is fixed in 1.11.8p2, 1.12.5p2, and 1.13.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52388 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Permission control vulnerability in the clock module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52387 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Resource reuse vulnerability in the GPU module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52386 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the RSMC module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52385 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the RSMC module. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52384 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Double-free vulnerability in the RSMC module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52383 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Double-free vulnerability in the RSMC module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52381 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Script injection vulnerability in the email module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52380 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability of improper access control in the email module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2023-52379 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Permission control vulnerability in the calendarProvider module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||