Total
398400 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-26020 | 1 Ankiweb | 1 Anki | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| An arbitrary script execution vulnerability exists in the MPV functionality of Ankitects Anki 24.04. A specially crafted flashcard can lead to a arbitrary code execution. An attacker can send malicious flashcard to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26019 | 1 Ninjaforms | 1 Ninja Forms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Ninja Forms prior to 3.8.1 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in submit processing. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the user who is accessing to the website using the product. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26018 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in TvRock 0.9t8a. An arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the user accessing the website that uses the product. Note that the developer was unreachable, therefore, users should consider stop using TvRock 0.9t8a. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26017 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| Uncontrolled search path in some Intel(R) Rendering Toolkit software before version 2024.1.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26016 | 1 Apache | 1 Superset | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A low privilege authenticated user could import an existing dashboard or chart that they do not have access to and then modify its metadata, thereby gaining ownership of the object. However, it's important to note that access to the analytical data of these charts and dashboards would still be subject to validation based on data access privileges. This issue affects Apache Superset: before 3.0.4, from 3.1.0 before 3.1.1.Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.1.1, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26015 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.4 LOW |
| An incorrect parsing of numbers with different radices vulnerability [CWE-1389] in FortiProxy version 7.4.3 and below, version 7.2.10 and below, version 7.0.17 and below and FortiOS version 7.4.3 and below, version 7.2.8 and below, version 7.0.15 and below IP address validation feature may permit an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the IP blocklist via crafted requests. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26013 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager, Fortios and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A improper restriction of communication channel to intended endpoints vulnerability [CWE-923] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15 and before 6.2.16, Fortinet FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9 and before 7.0.15, Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 and before 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 and before 6.2.13, Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 before 6.4.8 and Fortinet FortiWeb before 7.4.2 may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to impersonate the management device (FortiCloud server or/and in certain conditions, FortiManager), via intercepting the FGFM authentication request between the management device and the managed device | |||||
| CVE-2024-26012 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortiap, Fortiap-s, Fortiap-w2 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiAP-S 6.2 all verisons, and 6.4.0 through 6.4.9, FortiAP-W2 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, and 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiAP 6.4 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, and 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 allow a local authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code via the CLI. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26011 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortimanager, Fortios, Fortipam and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A missing authentication for critical function in Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.4, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiPAM version 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.0.0 through 7.0.17, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, FortiPortal version 6.0.0 through 6.0.14, FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26010 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiPAM version 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiWeb, FortiAuthenticator, FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.1 through 7.0.3, FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 2.0.0 through 2.0.13, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26009 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, FortiOS 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, FortiOS 6.0 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2.0, FortiPAM 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, FortiPAM 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 allows an unauthenticated attacker to seize control of a managed device via crafted FGFM requests, if the device is managed by a FortiManager, and if the attacker knows that FortiManager's serial number. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26008 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An improper check or handling of exceptional conditions vulnerability [CWE-703] in FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 and before 7.2.7, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 and before 7.2.9, FortiPAM before 1.2.0 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 fgfm daemon may allow an unauthenticated attacker to repeatedly reset the fgfm connection via crafted SSL encrypted TCP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26007 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An improper check or handling of exceptional conditions vulnerability [CWE-703] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.4.1 allows an unauthenticated attacker to provoke a denial of service on the administrative interface via crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26006 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page Generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiOS version 7.4.3 and below, version 7.2.7 and below, version 7.0.13 and below and FortiProxy version 7.4.3 and below, version 7.2.9 and below, version 7.0.16 and below web SSL VPN UI may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform a Cross-Site Scripting attack via a malicious samba server. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26005 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 8 Charx Sec-3000, Charx Sec-3000 Firmware, Charx Sec-3050 and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can gain service level privileges through an incomplete cleanup during service restart after a DoS. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26004 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 8 Charx Sec-3000, Charx Sec-3000 Firmware, Charx Sec-3050 and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can DoS a control agent due to access of a uninitialized pointer which may prevent or disrupt the charging functionality. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26003 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 8 Charx Sec-3000, Charx Sec-3000 Firmware, Charx Sec-3050 and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can DoS the control agent due to a out-of-bounds read which may prevent or disrupt the charging functionality. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26002 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 8 Charx Sec-3000, Charx Sec-3000 Firmware, Charx Sec-3050 and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An improper input validation in the Qualcom plctool allows a local attacker with low privileges to gain root access by changing the ownership of specific files. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26001 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 8 Charx Sec-3000, Charx Sec-3000 Firmware, Charx Sec-3050 and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can write memory out of bounds due to improper input validation in the MQTT stack. The brute force attack is not always successful because of memory randomization. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26000 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 8 Charx Sec-3000, Charx Sec-3000 Firmware, Charx Sec-3050 and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can read memory out of bounds due to improper input validation in the MQTT stack. The brute force attack is not always successful because of memory randomization. | |||||