Total
396416 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-37302 | 1 Matrix | 1 Synapse | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Synapse is an open-source Matrix homeserver. Synapse versions before 1.106 are vulnerable to a disk fill attack, where an unauthenticated adversary can induce Synapse to download and cache large amounts of remote media. The default rate limit strategy is insufficient to mitigate this. This can lead to a denial of service, ranging from further media uploads/downloads failing to completely unavailability of the Synapse process, depending on how Synapse was deployed. Synapse 1.106 introduces a new "leaky bucket" rate limit on remote media downloads to reduce the amount of data a user can request at a time. This does not fully address the issue, but does limit an unauthenticated user's ability to request large amounts of data to be cached. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37301 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Document Merge Service is a document template merge service providing an API to manage templates and merge them with given data. Versions 6.5.1 and prior are vulnerable to remote code execution via server-side template injection which, when executed as root, can result in full takeover of the affected system. As of time of publication, no patched version exists, nor have any known workarounds been disclosed. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37300 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| OAuthenticator is software that allows OAuth2 identity providers to be plugged in and used with JupyterHub. JupyterHub < 5.0, when used with `GlobusOAuthenticator`, could be configured to allow all users from a particular institution only. This worked fine prior to JupyterHub 5.0, because `allow_all` did not take precedence over `identity_provider`. Since JupyterHub 5.0, `allow_all` does take precedence over `identity_provider`. On a hub with the same config, now all users will be allowed to login, regardless of `identity_provider`. `identity_provider` will basically be ignored. This is a documented change in JupyterHub 5.0, but is likely to catch many users by surprise. OAuthenticator 16.3.1 fixes the issue with JupyterHub 5.0, and does not affect previous versions. As a workaround, do not upgrade to JupyterHub 5.0 when using `GlobusOAuthenticator` in the prior configuration. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37299 | 1 Discourse | 1 Discourse | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5, crafting requests to submit very long tag group names can reduce the availability of a Discourse instance. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37298 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| gorilla/schema converts structs to and from form values. Prior to version 1.4.1 Running `schema.Decoder.Decode()` on a struct that has a field of type `[]struct{...}` opens it up to malicious attacks regarding memory allocations, taking advantage of the sparse slice functionality. Any use of `schema.Decoder.Decode()` on a struct with arrays of other structs could be vulnerable to this memory exhaustion vulnerability. Version 1.4.1 contains a patch for the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37297 | 1 Woocommerce | 1 Woocommerce | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| WooCommerce is an open-source e-commerce platform built on WordPress. A vulnerability introduced in WooCommerce 8.8 allows for cross-site scripting. A bad actor can manipulate a link to include malicious HTML & JavaScript content. While the content is not saved to the database, the links may be sent to victims for malicious purposes. The injected JavaScript could hijack content & data stored in the browser, including the session. The URL content is read through the `Sourcebuster.js` library and then inserted without proper sanitization to the classic checkout and registration forms. Versions 8.8.5 and 8.9.3 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may disable the Order Attribution feature. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37296 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Aimeos HTML client provides Aimeos HTML components for e-commerce projects. Starting in version 2020.04.1 and prior to versions 2020.10.27, 2021.10.21, 2022.10.12, 2023.10.14, and 2024.04.5, digital downloads sold in online shops can be downloaded without valid payment, e.g. if the payment didn't succeed. Versions 2020.10.27, 2021.10.21, 2022.10.12, 2023.10.14, and 2024.04.5 fix this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37295 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Aimeos is an Open Source e-commerce framework for online shops. Starting in version 2024.01.1 and prior to version 2024.04.5, a user with administrative privileges can upload files that look like images but contain PHP code which can then be executed in the context of the web server. Version 2024.04.5 fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37294 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Aimeos is an Open Source e-commerce framework for online shops. All SaaS and marketplace setups using Aimeos version from 2022/2023/2024 are affected by a potential denial of service attack. Users should upgrade to versions 2022.10.17, 2023.10.17, or 2024.04 of the aimeos/aimeos-core package to receive a patch. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37293 | 1 Amazon | 1 Aws Deployment Framework | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The AWS Deployment Framework (ADF) is a framework to manage and deploy resources across multiple AWS accounts and regions within an AWS Organization. ADF allows for staged, parallel, multi-account, cross-region deployments of applications or resources via the structure defined in AWS Organizations while taking advantage of services such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeCommit to alleviate the heavy lifting and management compared to a traditional CI/CD setup. ADF contains a bootstrap process that is responsible to deploy ADF's bootstrap stacks to facilitate multi-account cross-region deployments. The ADF bootstrap process relies on elevated privileges to perform this task. Two versions of the bootstrap process exist; a code-change driven pipeline using AWS CodeBuild and an event-driven state machine using AWS Lambda. If an actor has permissions to change the behavior of the CodeBuild project or the Lambda function, they would be able to escalate their privileges. Prior to version 4.0.0, the bootstrap CodeBuild role provides access to the `sts:AssumeRole` operation without further restrictions. Therefore, it is able to assume into any AWS Account in the AWS Organization with the elevated privileges provided by the cross-account access role. By default, this role is not restricted when it is created by AWS Organizations, providing Administrator level access to the AWS resources in the AWS Account. The patches for this issue are included in `aws-deployment-framework` version 4.0.0. As a temporary mitigation, add a permissions boundary to the roles created by ADF in the management account. The permissions boundary should deny all IAM and STS actions. This permissions boundary should be in place until you upgrade ADF or bootstrap a new account. While the permissions boundary is in place, the account management and bootstrapping of accounts are unable to create, update, or assume into roles. This mitigates the privilege escalation risk, but also disables ADF's ability to create, manage, and bootstrap accounts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37289 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Apex One | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37288 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| A deserialization issue in Kibana can lead to arbitrary code execution when Kibana attempts to parse a YAML document containing a crafted payload. This issue only affects users that use Elastic Security’s built-in AI tools https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/security/current/ai-for-security.html and have configured an Amazon Bedrock connector https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/security/current/assistant-connect-to-bedrock.html . | |||||
| CVE-2024-37287 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A flaw allowing arbitrary code execution was discovered in Kibana. An attacker with access to ML and Alerting connector features, as well as write access to internal ML indices can trigger a prototype pollution vulnerability, ultimately leading to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37286 | 1 Elastic | 1 Apm Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| APM server logs contain document body from a partially failed bulk index request. For example, in case of unavailable_shards_exception for a specific document, since the ES response line contains the document body, and that APM server logs the ES response line on error, the document is effectively logged. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37285 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A deserialization issue in Kibana can lead to arbitrary code execution when Kibana attempts to parse a YAML document containing a crafted payload. A successful attack requires a malicious user to have a combination of both specific Elasticsearch indices privileges https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/defining-roles.html#roles-indices-priv and Kibana privileges https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/fleet/current/fleet-roles-and-privileges.html assigned to them. The following Elasticsearch indices permissions are required * write privilege on the system indices .kibana_ingest* * The allow_restricted_indices flag is set to true Any of the following Kibana privileges are additionally required * Under Fleet the All privilege is granted * Under Integration the Read or All privilege is granted * Access to the fleet-setup privilege is gained through the Fleet Server’s service account token | |||||
| CVE-2024-37284 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Improper handling of alternate encoding occurs when Elastic Defend on Windows systems attempts to scan a file or process encoded as a multibyte character. This leads to an uncaught exception causing Elastic Defend to crash which in turn will prevent it from quarantining the file and/or killing the process. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37283 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elastic Agent | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered whereby Elastic Agent will leak secrets from the agent policy elastic-agent.yml only when the log level is configured to debug. By default the log level is set to info, where no leak occurs. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37282 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elastic Cloud Enterprise | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| It was identified that under certain specific preconditions, an API key that was originally created with a specific privileges could be subsequently used to create new API keys that have elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37281 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Kibana where a user with Viewer role could cause a Kibana instance to crash by sending a large number of maliciously crafted requests to a specific endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37280 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was discovered in Elasticsearch, affecting document ingestion when an index template contains a dynamic field mapping of “passthrough” type. Under certain circumstances, ingesting documents in this index would cause a StackOverflow exception to be thrown and ultimately lead to a Denial of Service. Note that passthrough fields is an experimental feature. | |||||