Total
395466 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-48894 | 1 Socomec | 2 Diris M-70, Diris M-70 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A cleartext transmission vulnerability exists in the WEBVIEW-M functionality of Socomec DIRIS Digiware M-70 1.6.9. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to a disclosure of sensitive information. An attacker can sniff network traffic to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48893 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisoar | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiSOAR 7.3.0 through 7.3.3, 7.2.1 through 7.2.2 may allow an authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting (XSS) attack via the creation of malicious playbook. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48892 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisoar | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A relative path traversal vulnerability [CWE-23] in FortiSOAR 7.6.0, 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to read arbitrary files via uploading a malicious solution pack. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48891 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisoar | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSOAR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions may allow an attacker who has already obtained a non-login low privileged shell access (via another hypothetical vulnerability) to perform a local privilege escalation via crafted commands. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48890 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisoar Imap Connector | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSOAR IMAP connector version 3.5.7 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a specifically crafted playbook | |||||
| CVE-2024-48889 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanager Cloud | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiManager version 7.6.0, version 7.4.4 and below, version 7.2.7 and below, version 7.0.12 and below, version 6.4.14 and below and FortiManager Cloud version 7.4.4 and below, version 7.2.7 to 7.2.1, version 7.0.12 to 7.0.1 may allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute unauthorized code via FGFM crafted requests. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48887 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiswitch | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A unverified password change vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSwitch GUI may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to change admin passwords via a specially crafted request | |||||
| CVE-2024-48886 | 1 Fortinet | 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortimanager and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A weak authentication in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, FortiProxy versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.17, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, FortiManager versions 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiManager Cloud versions 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiAnalyzer Cloud versions 7.4.1 through 7.4.3 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a brute-force attack. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48883 | 1 Samsung | 38 Exynos 1080, Exynos 1080 Firmware, Exynos 1280 and 35 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor, and Modem Exynos 9820, 9825, 980, 990, 850, 1080, 2100, 1280, 2200, 1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 9110, W920, W930, W1000, Modem 5123, and Modem 5300. The UE incorrectly handles a malformed uplink scheduling message, resulting in an information leak of the UE. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48882 | 1 Socomec | 2 Diris M-70, Diris M-70 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the Modbus TCP functionality of Socomec DIRIS Digiware M-70 1.6.9. A specially crafted network packet can lead to denial of service. An attacker can send an unauthenticated packet to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48881 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bcache: revert replacing IS_ERR_OR_NULL with IS_ERR again Commit 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in node allocations") leads a NULL pointer deference in cache_set_flush(). 1721 if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(c->root)) 1722 list_add(&c->root->list, &c->btree_cache); >From the above code in cache_set_flush(), if previous registration code fails before allocating c->root, it is possible c->root is NULL as what it is initialized. __bch_btree_node_alloc() never returns NULL but c->root is possible to be NULL at above line 1721. This patch replaces IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to fix this. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48878 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Admanager Plus | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| Zohocorp ManageEngine ADManager Plus versions 7241 and prior are vulnerable to SQL Injection in Archived Audit Report. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48877 | 1 Wagner | 1 Xls2csv | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the Shared String Table Record Parser implementation in xls2csv utility version 0.95. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48876 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: stackdepot: fix stack_depot_save_flags() in NMI context Per documentation, stack_depot_save_flags() was meant to be usable from NMI context if STACK_DEPOT_FLAG_CAN_ALLOC is unset. However, it still would try to take the pool_lock in an attempt to save a stack trace in the current pool (if space is available). This could result in deadlock if an NMI is handled while pool_lock is already held. To avoid deadlock, only try to take the lock in NMI context and give up if unsuccessful. The documentation is fixed to clearly convey this. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48875 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: don't take dev_replace rwsem on task already holding it Running fstests btrfs/011 with MKFS_OPTIONS="-O rst" to force the usage of the RAID stripe-tree, we get the following splat from lockdep: BTRFS info (device sdd): dev_replace from /dev/sdd (devid 1) to /dev/sdb started ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- btrfs/2326 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f215c98 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810f215c98 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 1 lock held by btrfs/2326: #0: ffff88810f215c98 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2326 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3-btrfs-for-next #599 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x80 __lock_acquire+0x2798/0x69d0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0 ? btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100 down_read+0x8e/0x440 ? btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x23/0x40 btrfs_map_block+0x39f/0x2250 ? btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0xd69/0x1d00 ? btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked+0xd9/0x2e0 ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x6e/0x70 ? __pfx_btrfs_map_block+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1f2/0x300 ? mempool_alloc_noprof+0xed/0x2b0 btrfs_submit_chunk+0x28d/0x17e0 ? __pfx_btrfs_submit_chunk+0x10/0x10 ? bvec_alloc+0xd7/0x1b0 ? bio_add_folio+0x171/0x270 ? __pfx_bio_add_folio+0x10/0x10 ? __kasan_check_read+0x20/0x20 btrfs_submit_bio+0x37/0x80 read_extent_buffer_pages+0x3df/0x6c0 btrfs_read_extent_buffer+0x13e/0x5f0 read_tree_block+0x81/0xe0 read_block_for_search+0x4bd/0x7a0 ? __pfx_read_block_for_search+0x10/0x10 btrfs_search_slot+0x78d/0x2720 ? __pfx_btrfs_search_slot+0x10/0x10 ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100 ? kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 ? __kasan_slab_alloc+0x6e/0x70 ? kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x1f2/0x300 btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset+0x181/0x820 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_btrfs_get_raid_extent_offset+0x10/0x10 ? down_read+0x194/0x440 ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x23/0x40 btrfs_map_block+0x5b5/0x2250 ? __pfx_btrfs_map_block+0x10/0x10 scrub_submit_initial_read+0x8fe/0x11b0 ? __pfx_scrub_submit_initial_read+0x10/0x10 submit_initial_group_read+0x161/0x3a0 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x710 ? __pfx_submit_initial_group_read+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 scrub_simple_mirror.isra.0+0x3eb/0x580 scrub_stripe+0xe4d/0x1440 ? lock_release+0x20e/0x710 ? __pfx_scrub_stripe+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70 ? _raw_read_unlock+0x23/0x40 scrub_chunk+0x257/0x4a0 scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x64c/0xf70 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x147/0x5f0 ? __pfx_scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x10/0x10 ? bit_wait_timeout+0xb0/0x170 ? __up_read+0x189/0x700 ? scrub_workers_get+0x231/0x300 ? up_write+0x490/0x4f0 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x52e/0xcd0 ? create_pending_snapshots+0x230/0x250 ? __pfx_btrfs_scrub_dev+0x10/0x10 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0xd69/0x1d00 ? lock_acquire+0x19d/0x4a0 ? __pfx_btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0x10/0x10 ? ---truncated--- | |||||
| CVE-2024-48874 | 1 Ruijienetworks | 1 Reyee Os | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Ruijie Reyee OS versions 2.206.x up to but not including 2.320.x could give attackers the ability to force Ruijie's proxy servers to perform any request the attackers choose. Using this, attackers could access internal services used by Ruijie and their internal cloud infrastructure via AWS cloud metadata services. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48873 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtw89: check return value of ieee80211_probereq_get() for RNR The return value of ieee80211_probereq_get() might be NULL, so check it before using to avoid NULL pointer access. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1529805 ("Dereference null return value") | |||||
| CVE-2024-48872 | 1 Mattermost | 1 Mattermost Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Mattermost versions 10.1.x <= 10.1.2, 10.0.x <= 10.0.2, 9.11.x <= 9.11.4, and 9.5.x <= 9.5.12 fail to prevent concurrently checking and updating the failed login attempts. which allows an attacker to bypass of "Max failed attempts" restriction and send a big number of login attempts before being blocked via simultaneously sending multiple login requests | |||||
| CVE-2024-48871 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The affected product is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. An unauthenticated attacker could send a malicious HTTP request that the webserver fails to properly check input size before copying data to the stack, potentially allowing remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48870 | 2 Sharp, Toshibatec | 640 Bp-30c25, Bp-30c25 Firmware, Bp-30c25t and 637 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| Sharp and Toshiba Tec MFPs improperly validate input data in URI data registration, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability. If crafted input is stored by an administrative user, malicious script may be executed on the web browsers of other victim users. | |||||