Total
395116 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-53683 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| A valid set of credentials in a .js file and a static token for communication were obtained from the decompiled IPA. An attacker could use the information to disrupt normal use of the application by changing the translation files and thus weaken the integrity of normal use. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53682 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: regulator: axp20x: AXP717: set ramp_delay AXP717 datasheet says that regulator ramp delay is 15.625 us/step, which is 10mV in our case. Add a AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY macro and update AXP_DESC_RANGES macro to expand to AXP_DESC_RANGES_DELAY with ramp_delay = 0 For DCDC4, steps is 100mv Add a AXP_DESC_DELAY macro and update AXP_DESC macro to expand to AXP_DESC_DELAY with ramp_delay = 0 This patch fix crashes when using CPU DVFS. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53681 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmet: Don't overflow subsysnqn nvmet_root_discovery_nqn_store treats the subsysnqn string like a fixed size buffer, even though it is dynamically allocated to the size of the string. Create a new string with kstrndup instead of using the old buffer. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53680 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipvs: fix UB due to uninitialized stack access in ip_vs_protocol_init() Under certain kernel configurations when building with Clang/LLVM, the compiler does not generate a return or jump as the terminator instruction for ip_vs_protocol_init(), triggering the following objtool warning during build time: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: ip_vs_protocol_init() falls through to next function __initstub__kmod_ip_vs_rr__935_123_ip_vs_rr_init6() At runtime, this either causes an oops when trying to load the ipvs module or a boot-time panic if ipvs is built-in. This same issue has been reported by the Intel kernel test robot previously. Digging deeper into both LLVM and the kernel code reveals this to be a undefined behavior problem. ip_vs_protocol_init() uses a on-stack buffer of 64 chars to store the registered protocol names and leaves it uninitialized after definition. The function calls strnlen() when concatenating protocol names into the buffer. With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE strnlen() performs an extra step to check whether the last byte of the input char buffer is a null character (commit 3009f891bb9f ("fortify: Allow strlen() and strnlen() to pass compile-time known lengths")). This, together with possibly other configurations, cause the following IR to be generated: define hidden i32 @ip_vs_protocol_init() local_unnamed_addr #5 section ".init.text" align 16 !kcfi_type !29 { %1 = alloca [64 x i8], align 16 ... 14: ; preds = %11 %15 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63 %16 = load i8, ptr %15, align 1 %17 = tail call i1 @llvm.is.constant.i8(i8 %16) %18 = icmp eq i8 %16, 0 %19 = select i1 %17, i1 %18, i1 false br i1 %19, label %20, label %23 20: ; preds = %14 %21 = call i64 @strlen(ptr noundef nonnull dereferenceable(1) %1) #23 ... 23: ; preds = %14, %11, %20 %24 = call i64 @strnlen(ptr noundef nonnull dereferenceable(1) %1, i64 noundef 64) #24 ... } The above code calculates the address of the last char in the buffer (value %15) and then loads from it (value %16). Because the buffer is never initialized, the LLVM GVN pass marks value %16 as undefined: %13 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63 br i1 undef, label %14, label %17 This gives later passes (SCCP, in particular) more DCE opportunities by propagating the undef value further, and eventually removes everything after the load on the uninitialized stack location: define hidden i32 @ip_vs_protocol_init() local_unnamed_addr #0 section ".init.text" align 16 !kcfi_type !11 { %1 = alloca [64 x i8], align 16 ... 12: ; preds = %11 %13 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63 unreachable } In this way, the generated native code will just fall through to the next function, as LLVM does not generate any code for the unreachable IR instruction and leaves the function without a terminator. Zero the on-stack buffer to avoid this possible UB. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53679 | 1 Apache | 1 Vcl | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Apache VCL in the User Lookup form. A user with sufficient rights to be able to view this part of the site can craft a URL or be tricked in to clicking a URL that will give a specified user elevated rights. This issue affects all versions of Apache VCL through 2.5.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.5.2, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53678 | 1 Apache | 1 Vcl | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Apache VCL. Users can modify form data submitted when requesting a new Block Allocation such that a SELECT SQL statement is modified. The data returned by the SELECT statement is not viewable by the attacker. This issue affects all versions of Apache VCL from 2.2 through 2.5.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.5.2, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53677 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| File upload logic in Apache Struts is flawed. An attacker can manipulate file upload params to enable paths traversal and under some circumstances this can lead to uploading a malicious file which can be used to perform Remote Code Execution. This issue affects Apache Struts: from 2.0.0 before 6.4.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 6.4.0 at least and migrate to the new file upload mechanism https://struts.apache.org/core-developers/file-upload . If you are not using an old file upload logic based on FileuploadInterceptor your application is safe. You can find more details in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-067 | |||||
| CVE-2024-53676 | 1 Hpe | 1 Insight Remote Support | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A directory traversal vulnerability in Hewlett Packard Enterprise Insight Remote Support may allow remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53675 | 1 Hpe | 1 Insight Remote Support | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| An XML external entity injection (XXE) vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support may allow remote users to disclose information in certain cases. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53674 | 1 Hpe | 1 Insight Remote Support | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| An XML external entity injection (XXE) vulnerability in HPE Insight Remote Support may allow remote users to disclose information in certain cases. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53673 | 1 Hpe | 1 Insight Remote Support | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A java deserialization vulnerability in HPE Remote Insight Support may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53672 | 1 Arubanetworks | 1 Clearpass Policy Manager | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the ClearPass Policy Manager web-based management interface allows remote authenticated users to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. Successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a lower privileged user on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53651 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions). Affected devices do not encrypt certain data within the on-board flash storage on their PCB. This could allow an attacker with physical access to read the entire filesystem of the device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53649 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80 < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.80), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.80). Affected devices do not properly limit the path accessible via their webserver. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to read arbitrary files from the filesystem of affected devices. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53648 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.90). Affected devices do not properly limit access to a development shell accessible over a physical interface. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device to execute arbitrary commands on the device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53647 | 3 Apple, Google, Trendmicro | 3 Iphone Os, Android, Id Security | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Trend Micro ID Security, version 3.0 and below contains a vulnerability that could allow an attacker to send an unlimited number of email verification requests without any restriction, potentially leading to abuse or denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53636 | 1 Academiaerp | 1 Student Information System | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability via writefile.php of Serosoft Academia Student Information System (SIS) EagleR-1.0.118 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via ../ in the filePath parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53635 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Covid19 Testing Management System | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was found in /covid-tms/patient-search-report.php in PHPGurukul COVID 19 Testing Management System v1.0, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the searchdata POST request parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53623 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Incorrect access control in the component l_0_0.xml of TP-Link ARCHER-C7 v5 allows attackers to access sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53621 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| A buffer overflow in the formSetCfm() function of Tenda AC1206 1200M 11ac US_AC1206V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.23_multi_TD01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request. | |||||