Total
398467 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-33027 | 1 Bandisoft | 1 Bandizip | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Bandisoft Bandizip through 7.37, there is a Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of Bandizip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, Bandizip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. NOTE: this is disputed because Mark-of-the-Web propagation can increase risk via security-warning habituation, and because the intended control sphere for file-origin metadata (e.g., HostUrl in Zone.Identifier) may be narrower than that for reading the file's content. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33026 | 1 Peazip | 1 Peazip | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In PeaZip through 10.4.0, there is a Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass the Mark-of-the-Web protection mechanism on affected installations of PeaZip. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of archived files. When extracting files from a crafted archive that bears the Mark-of-the-Web, PeaZip does not propagate the Mark-of-the-Web to the extracted files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. NOTE: this is disputed because Mark-of-the-Web propagation can increase risk via security-warning habituation, and because the intended control sphere for file-origin metadata (e.g., HostUrl in Zone.Identifier) may be narrower than that for reading the file's content. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33025 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'traceroute' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33024 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'tcpdump' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33023 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.1 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions). The affected devices do not properly enforce the restriction of files that can be uploaded from the web interface. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges in the web interface to upload arbitrary files. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33020 | 1 Ibm | 1 Engineering Systems Design Rhapsody | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Engineering Systems Design Rhapsody 9.0.2, 10.0, and 10.0.1 transmits sensitive information without encryption that could allow an attacker to obtain highly sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33015 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.1.0 is vulnerable to malicious file upload by not validating the content of the file uploaded to the web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33014 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.7 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4 uses a web link with untrusted references to an external site. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions on the victims’ web browser. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33013 | 1 Ibm | 2 Mq Operator, Supplied Mq Advanced Container Images | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| IBM MQ Operator LTS 2.0.0 through 2.0.29, MQ Operator CD 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.1.0 through 3.1.3, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.6.0, and MQ Operator SC2 3.2.0 through 3.2.13 Container could disclose sensitive information to a local user due to improper clearing of heap memory before release. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33012 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Db2 10.5.0 through 10.5.11, 11.1.0 through 11.1.4.7, 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.3 for Linux could allow an authenticated user to regain access after account lockout due to password use after expiration date. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33008 | 1 Ibm | 2 Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator 6.2.1.0 and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.2.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33005 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics Local | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.0 and 2.1 does not invalidate session after a logout which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33004 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics Local | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.0 and 2.1 could allow a privileged user to delete files from directories due to improper pathname restriction. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33003 | 1 Ibm | 1 Infosphere Information Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7.0.0 through 11.7.1.6 could allow a non-root user to gain higher privileges/capabilities within the scope of a container due to execution with unnecessary privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33000 | 1 Intel | 1 Quickassist Technology | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper input validation for some Intel QuickAssist Technology before version 2.6.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32999 | 1 Appleple | 1 A-blog Cms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in a-blog cms versions prior to Ver. 3.1.43 and prior to Ver. 3.0.47. This issue exists in a specific field in the entry editing screen, and exploitation requires contributor or higher level privileges. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the user who is logging in to the product. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32997 | 1 Chimurai | 1 Http-proxy-middleware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In http-proxy-middleware before 2.0.9 and 3.x before 3.0.5, fixRequestBody proceeds even if bodyParser has failed. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32996 | 1 Chimurai | 1 Http-proxy-middleware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In http-proxy-middleware before 2.0.8 and 3.x before 3.0.4, writeBody can be called twice because "else if" is not used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32993 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Vision Helpdesk through 5.7.0 allows Time-Based Blind SQL injection via the Forgot Password (aka index.php?/home/forgot-password) vis_username parameter. Authentication is not needed. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32992 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.5 HIGH | ||
| Thermo Fisher Scientific ePort through 3.0.0 has Incorrect Access Control. | |||||