Total
7504 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-15899 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Macos, Chrome | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Use after free in CameraCapture in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.128 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | |||||
| CVE-2026-9135 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13448 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the validate_public_flow_no_code_execution() function that fails to block several code-execution agent components including OpenDsStarAgent, CodeActAgentSmolagents, and CSVAgent. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8859 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest component. A path traversal vulnerability exists when the "Save to File" feature is enabled, where filenames extracted from HTTP response Content-Disposition headers are not sanitized before being joined to the temporary directory path. An attacker controlling an external HTTP server can supply crafted filename values containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../), enabling arbitrary file writes to locations accessible by the Langflow process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8635 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7755 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7667 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to create a malicious flow pointing to an attacker-controlled URL that returns a specially crafted Content-Disposition header (e.g., filename="../../../target/path" ), enabling arbitrary file write operations with attacker-controlled content to any path accessible by the Langflow process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8476 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the disk-based caching mechanism. The AsyncDiskCache class uses Python's unsafe pickle.loads() function to deserialize cached objects from disk without validation, integrity verification, or authentication, enabling arbitrary code execution when malicious pickle payloads are processed. Attackers who can influence cached data through file system access, malicious workflow inputs, custom components, or API manipulation can achieve complete system compromise with the privileges of the Langflow server process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14499 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8505 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow's webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system incorrectly bypasses API key validation when the WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE configuration is set to False (which is the default setting). This allows a remote attacker who knows a flow's UUID to execute it as if they were the owner, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). | |||||
| CVE-2026-13446 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13445 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolute paths pointing to victim storage locations. In append mode, the attacker's workflow reads victim file contents, appends attacker-controlled data, and uploads a copy containing victim data to the attacker's namespace (confidentiality breach). In overwrite mode, the attacker can replace victim file contents with arbitrary data (integrity breach). This breaks the storage ownership boundary between users. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8056 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7754 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow 1.9.0 could allow server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to insecure default configuration and incomplete enforcement of the SSRF protection mechanism. | |||||
| CVE-2026-43715 | 1 Apple | 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free issue was addressed with improved memory management. This issue is fixed in Safari 26.5.2, iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2, iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, macOS Tahoe 26.5.2, tvOS 26.6, visionOS 26.6, watchOS 26.6. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65400 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An authentication issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.7.9, macOS Sonoma 14.8.9, macOS Tahoe 26.6.1, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An attacker on the network may be able to authenticate to Screen Sharing without valid credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20672 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure issue was addressed with improved privacy controls. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.3. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8497 | 3 Apple, Devolutions, Google | 4 Iphone Os, Macos, Password Manager and 1 more | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Improper certificate validation in the Devolutions Server connection handling in Devolutions Password Manager 2026.2.1.0 and earlier on Android, iOS, and macOS allows an adjacent-network attacker to intercept and modify sensitive information via a forged TLS certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2026-17716 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Macos, Chrome | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| Use after free in Updater in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a local attacker to perform privilege escalation via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2026-28982 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-10-24 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A race condition was addressed with improved locking. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6. A remote user may be able to cause unexpected system termination or corrupt kernel memory. | |||||