Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Total 400172 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2025-54525 1 Mattermost 1 Confluence 2026-06-17 N/A 7.5 HIGH
Mattermost Confluence Plugin version <1.5.0 fails to handle unexpected request body which allows attackers to crash the plugin via constant hit to create channel subscription endpoint with an invalid request body.
CVE-2025-54520 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.
CVE-2025-54519 2026-06-17 N/A 7.3 HIGH
A DLL hijacking vulnerability in Doc Nav could allow a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2025-54517 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
Out of bounds write in AMD AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl handler could allow a local user to escalate privileges via remote code execution.
CVE-2025-54515 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
The Secure Flag passed to Versal™ Adaptive SoC’s Trusted Firmware for Cortex®-A processors (TF-A) for Arm’s Power State Coordination Interface (PSCI) commands were incorrectly set to secure instead of using the processor’s actual security state. This would allow the PSCI requests to appear they were from processors in the secure state instead of the non-secure state.
CVE-2025-54514 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
Improper isolation of shared resources on a system on a chip by a malicious local attacker with high privileges could potentially lead to a partial loss of integrity.
CVE-2025-54511 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
Improper handling of insufficient privileges in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) could allow an attacker to provide an input value to a function without sufficient privileges and successfully write data, potentially resulting in loss of integrity of availability.
CVE-2025-54510 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
A missing lock verification in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) firmware may permit a locally authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to alter MMIO routing on some Zen 5-based products, potentially compromising guest system integrity.
CVE-2025-54505 2026-06-17 N/A N/A
A transient execution vulnerability within AMD CPUs may allow a local user-privileged attacker to leak data via the floating point divisor unit, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality.
CVE-2025-54500 1 F5 26 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 23 more 2026-06-17 N/A 5.3 MEDIUM
An HTTP/2 implementation flaw allows a denial-of-service (DoS) that uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames in order to break the max concurrent streams limit (HTTP/2 MadeYouReset Attack).  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
CVE-2025-54499 1 Mattermost 1 Mattermost Server 2026-06-17 N/A 3.1 LOW
Mattermost versions 10.5.x <= 10.5.10, 10.11.x <= 10.11.2 fail to use constant-time comparison for sensitive string comparisons which allows attackers to exploit timing oracles to perform byte-by-byte brute force attacks via response time analysis on Cloud API keys and OAuth client secrets
CVE-2025-54497 2026-06-17 N/A 8.1 HIGH
Cognex In-Sight Explorer and In-Sight Camera Firmware expose a telnet-based service on port 23 to allow management operations such as firmware upgrades and device reboots, which require authentication. A user with protected privileges can successfully invoke the SetSerialPort functionality to modify relevant device properties (such as serial interface settings), contradicting the security model proposed in the user manual.
CVE-2025-54496 1 Fujielectric 1 Monitouch V-sft 2026-06-17 N/A 7.8 HIGH
A maliciously crafted project file may cause a heap-based buffer overflow in Fuji Electric Monitouch V-SFT-6, which may allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2025-54495 1 Meddream 1 Pacs Server 2026-06-17 N/A 6.1 MEDIUM
A reflected cross-site scripting (xss) vulnerability exists in the emailfailedjob functionality of MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.6.870. A specially crafted malicious url can lead to arbitrary javascript code execution. An attacker can provide a crafted URL to trigger this vulnerability.
CVE-2025-54494 1 Libbiosig Project 1 Libbiosig 2026-06-17 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9205 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 133: else if (tag==133) //0x85 { curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
CVE-2025-54493 1 Libbiosig Project 1 Libbiosig 2026-06-17 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9184 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 131: else if (tag==131) //0x83 { // Patient Age if (len!=7) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag131 incorrect length %i!=7\n",len); curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
CVE-2025-54492 1 Libbiosig Project 1 Libbiosig 2026-06-17 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9141 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 67: else if (tag==67) //0x43: Sample skew { int skew=0; // [1] curPos += ifread(&skew, 1, len,hdr); In this case, the address of the newly-defined integer `skew` \[1\] is overflowed instead of `buf`. This means a stack overflow can occur using much smaller values of `len` in this code path.
CVE-2025-54491 1 Libbiosig Project 1 Libbiosig 2026-06-17 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9191 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 65: else if (tag==65) //0x41: patient event { // event table curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
CVE-2025-54490 1 Libbiosig Project 1 Libbiosig 2026-06-17 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9090 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 64: else if (tag==64) //0x40 { // preamble char tmp[256]; // [1] curPos += ifread(tmp,1,len,hdr); In this case, the overflowed buffer is the newly-declared `tmp` \[1\] instead of `buf`. While `tmp` is larger than `buf`, having a size of 256 bytes, a stack overflow can still occur in cases where `len` is encoded using multiple octets and is greater than 256.
CVE-2025-54489 1 Libbiosig Project 1 Libbiosig 2026-06-17 N/A 9.8 CRITICAL
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 8970 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 63: else if (tag==63) { uint8_t tag2=255, len2=255; count = 0; while ((count<len) && !(FlagInfiniteLength && len2==0 && tag2==0)){ curPos += ifread(&tag2,1,1,hdr); curPos += ifread(&len2,1,1,hdr); if (VERBOSE_LEVEL==9) fprintf(stdout,"MFER: tag=%3i chan=%2i len=%-4i tag2=%3i len2=%3i curPos=%i %li count=%4i\n",tag,chan,len,tag2,len2,curPos,iftell(hdr),(int)count); if (FlagInfiniteLength && len2==0 && tag2==0) break; count += (2+len2); curPos += ifread(&buf,1,len2,hdr); Here, the number of bytes read is not the Data Length decoded from the current frame in the file (`len`) but rather is a new length contained in a single octet read from the same input file (`len2`). Despite this, a stack-based buffer overflow condition can still occur, as the destination buffer is still `buf`, which has a size of only 128 bytes, while `len2` can be as large as 255.