Total
396035 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73007 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Biometric Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-73002 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in Windows Biometric Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-72996 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Biometric Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-42018 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| JFrog Artifactory could return an internal anonymous-user token to an unauthenticated caller when anonymous access is disabled, potentially exposing sensitive resources. | |||||
| CVE-2026-42016 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| JFrog Artifactory (Self Hosted) versions before 7.133.11 are vulnerable to a privilege escalation attack due to a validation check of the token signature/issuer and not the token’s scope. | |||||
| CVE-2026-87875 | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The cupsUTF32ToUTF8() function in CUPS's cups/transcode.c lacks a source-length bound and can read past the end of the source buffer, resulting in a heap out-of-bounds read. This is reachable via SNMP supply-description parsing in backend/snmp-supplies.c with attacker-controlled content. | |||||
| CVE-2026-86169 | 2026-09-12 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| Axolotl before 0.19.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the multipack patch path where trust_remote_code defaults to None instead of False, causing the security guard to be bypassed. Attackers can execute arbitrary Python code by crafting a malicious Hugging Face model repository selected as base_model, which is loaded with hardcoded trust_remote_code=True during AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained. | |||||
| CVE-2026-88924 | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH | ||
| A flaw was found in the admin backend of gvfs. The privileged gvfsd-admin daemon changes the ownership of newly created private D-Bus sockets by calling the link-following chown() function on a pathname inside a user-controlled directory. A local attacker can exploit this via a Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition and exchange the socket pathname with a symbolic link pointing to an arbitrary root-owned file (such as /etc/pam.d/su). The daemon subsequently follows the symlink and changes the ownership of the targeted root-owned file to the attacker's user ID. This allows an authenticated local attacker to modify critical system files, leading to a full local privilege escalation to root. | |||||
| CVE-2026-82001 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 5 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 2 more | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Acrobat Reader is affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2026-81982 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 5 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 2 more | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Acrobat Reader is affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2026-81977 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 5 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 2 more | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Acrobat Reader is affected by an Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75740 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75735 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75729 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75722 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75716 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75706 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75683 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75677 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-75661 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2026-09-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | |||||