Total
10319 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-11056 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SiteIsolation in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11036 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in DOM in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to bypass same origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11083 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Password Manager in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11063 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebNN in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11077 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Bad cast in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11055 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Use after free in ANGLE in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11070 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromoting in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the network process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11067 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Uninitialized Use in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11057 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Uninitialized Use in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11045 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11060 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-9135 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9103 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper authentication in the /api/v1/login/auto_login endpoint. The endpoint issues long-lived superuser bearer tokens without requiring authentication when the AUTO_LOGIN configuration is enabled (enabled by default), which may allow an unauthenticated network attacker to obtain full administrative access. Additionally, permissive cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) settings may allow tokens to be exposed to unintended origins, increasing the risk of unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8859 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest component. A path traversal vulnerability exists when the "Save to File" feature is enabled, where filenames extracted from HTTP response Content-Disposition headers are not sanitized before being joined to the temporary directory path. An attacker controlling an external HTTP server can supply crafted filename values containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../), enabling arbitrary file writes to locations accessible by the Langflow process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8635 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and achieve full system compromise with Langflow service permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8505 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow's webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system incorrectly bypasses API key validation when the WEBHOOK_AUTH_ENABLE configuration is set to False (which is the default setting). This allows a remote attacker who knows a flow's UUID to execute it as if they were the owner, potentially leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE). | |||||
| CVE-2026-8481 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts user-supplied Python code and executes it directly using Python's built-in exec() function without sandboxing, input validation, or privilege restrictions, enabling any authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands with the full privileges of the Langflow server process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8476 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the disk-based caching mechanism. The AsyncDiskCache class uses Python's unsafe pickle.loads() function to deserialize cached objects from disk without validation, integrity verification, or authentication, enabling arbitrary code execution when malicious pickle payloads are processed. Attackers who can influence cached data through file system access, malicious workflow inputs, custom components, or API manipulation can achieve complete system compromise with the privileges of the Langflow server process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8056 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to override component parameters at runtime via the API. A critical security flaw exists in the parameter filtering mechanism within the `apply_tweaks()` function. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7755 | 4 Apple, Langflow, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Langflow, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files. | |||||