Filtered by vendor Langflow
Subscribe
Total
160 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8446 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) composer endpoint when mcp_composer_enabled=true (default) and projects are configured with auth_type=oauth . | |||||
| CVE-2026-17625 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9077 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 8.5 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 Langflow allows remote authenticated attackers to bypass localhost-only restrictions and write arbitrary MCP server configurations to IDE configuration files on the host system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7658 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 does not properly validate the username field, allowing attackers to inject path traversal sequences and bypass containment checks. This enables multiple severe impacts, including arbitrary directory deletion, cross-tenant data destruction, and JWT signing key deletion leading to session invalidation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-10128 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 allows authenticated users can exploit a built-in Langflow component to read arbitrary server environment variables, exposing sensitive secrets despite security controls intended to disable custom components. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7869 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 is vulnerable to Path Traversal in the Knowledge Bases API (`POST /api/v1/knowledge_bases`). This occurs because user-supplied knowledge base names are used directly to create file paths without proper sanitization or containment checks. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to create directories and write files anywhere on the server's filesystem. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8182 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 installations allow anyone on the internet to execute arbitrary code on the server without any credentials via 2 HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8183 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot " sequences ( /.. /) to v i ew arbitrary files on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8470 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 use Python's non-cryptographic random module for generating Fernet encryption keys from user secrets under 32 characters. The deterministic Mersenne Twister PRNG produces identical keys for identical seeds, allowing attackers to reproduce encryption keys and decrypt stored API keys and authentication tokens. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8478 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7657 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 Langflow could allow server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to incomplete and ineffective SSRF protection enforcement. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9081 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-06 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the validate_model_provider_key() function for the Ollama provider. The function accepts a user-supplied OLLAMA_BASE_URL parameter and passes it directly to requests.get() without validation, scheme/host allowlisting, or filtering of private IP ranges (loopback, RFC1918, link-local addresses). | |||||
| CVE-2026-12940 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 are vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via environment variable injection in the MCP (Model Context Protocol) stdio launcher. The vulnerability exists in src/lfx/src/lfx/base/mcp/util.py where the DANGEROUS_ENV_VARS blocklist fails to include SHELLOPTS , BASHOPTS , and PS4 environment variables. | |||||
| CVE-2026-12945 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows authenticated users to access and manipulate other users' build jobs through improper access control on log retrieval and unauthenticated build endpoints. | |||||
| CVE-2026-10700 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 contains multiple broken access control vulnerabilities in its file handling API that allow unauthorized access to user files.The /api/v1/files/images/{flow_id}/{file_name} endpoint does not enforce authentication or authorization checks, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve image files associated with any flow by specifying a valid flow_id and file_name.Additionally, the /api/v1/files/download/{flow_id}/{file_name} endpoint requires authentication but fails to properly validate ownership of the requested resource. As a result, an authenticated user can access files belonging to other users by supplying arbitrary identifiers, leading to an authorization bypass (IDOR).Successful exploitation may result in unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data, including files stored in private flows. This issue breaks tenant isolation in multi-user deployments. | |||||
| CVE-2026-12942 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot " sequences ( /.. /) to view arbitrary files on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13435 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the PythonREPL sandbox implementation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13444 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an attacker to access another user's private vector documents by creating their own flow with matching Chroma persist_directory and collection_name values. The attacker receives exact victim content in their workflow output despite having no authorization to read the victim's flow. Additionally, the attacker can pollute the victim's collection by inserting their own documents into the shared namespace. | |||||
| CVE-2026-12946 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13442 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-08-04 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an attacker to reuse another user's FAISS namespace to access owner-only vector content and influence later query results. This causes cross-user information disclosure and limited integrity impact through persistent poisoning of returned results. | |||||