Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscribe
Total
9117 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-4941 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Mq Light | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM WebSphere MQ Light 1.x before 1.0.2 mishandles abbreviated TLS handshakes, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (MQXR service crash) via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4940 | 2 Apache, Ibm | 2 Ambari, Infosphere Biginsights | 2026-06-17 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Apache Ambari before 2.1, as used in IBM Infosphere BigInsights 4.x before 4.1, stores a cleartext BigSheets password in a configuration file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4939 | 1 Ibm | 3 Emptoris Program Management, Emptoris Strategic Supply Management, Emptoris Supplier Lifecycle Management | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Emptoris Supplier Lifecycle Management and Emptoris Program Management 10.x before 10.0.1.4_iFix3, 10.0.2.x before 10.0.2.7_iFix1, 10.0.3.x before 10.0.3.2, and 10.0.4.x before 10.0.4.0_iFix1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4938 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.x before 7.0.0.39, 8.0.x before 8.0.0.11, and 8.5.x before 8.5.5.7 allows remote attackers to spoof servlets and obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4936 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Extreme Scale | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale 8.6 through 8.6.0.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4935 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4931, CVE-2015-4932, CVE-2015-4933, and CVE-2015-4934. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4934 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4931, CVE-2015-4932, CVE-2015-4933, and CVE-2015-4935. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4933 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4931, CVE-2015-4932, CVE-2015-4934, and CVE-2015-4935. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4932 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4931, CVE-2015-4933, CVE-2015-4934, and CVE-2015-4935. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4931 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4932, CVE-2015-4933, CVE-2015-4934, and CVE-2015-4935. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4930 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2026-06-17 | 9.0 HIGH | N/A |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.1 MR2 before Patch 11 IF02 and 7.2.x before 7.2.5 Patch 4 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges by leveraging admin access. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4929 | 1 Ibm | 1 License Metric Tool | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| IBM License Metric Tool 9 before 9.2.1.0 and Endpoint Manager for Software Use Analysis 9 before 9.2.1.0 allow remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and obtain sensitive information via a REST API request. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4928 | 2 Apache, Ibm | 2 Ambari, Infosphere Biginsights | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Ambari before 2.1, as used in IBM Infosphere BigInsights 4.x before 4.1, includes cleartext passwords on a Configs screen, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading password fields. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4927 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Storage Manager | 2026-06-17 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| The Reporting and Monitoring component in Tivoli Monitoring in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 6.3 before 6.3.6 and 7.1 before 7.1.3 on Linux and AIX uses world-writable permissions for unspecified files, which allows local users to gain privileges by writing to a file. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4000 | 12 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 9 more | 25 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Safari and 22 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3318 | 5 Ca, Hp, Ibm and 2 more | 10 Client Automation, Network And Systems Management, Nsm Job Management Option and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, does not properly validate an unspecified variable, which allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3317 | 5 Ca, Hp, Ibm and 2 more | 10 Client Automation, Network And Systems Management, Nsm Job Management Option and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, does not properly perform bounds checking, which allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3316 | 6 Broadcom, Ca, Hp and 3 more | 11 Network And Systems Management, Client Automation, Network And Systems Management and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, allows local users to gain privileges via an unspecified environment variable. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3217 | 2 Ibm, Pcre | 3 Powerkvm, Pcre, Pcre2 | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| PCRE 7.8 and 8.32 through 8.37, and PCRE2 10.10 mishandle group empty matches, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack-based buffer overflow) via a crafted regular expression, as demonstrated by /^(?:(?(1)\\.|([^\\\\W_])?)+)+$/. | |||||
| CVE-2015-2808 | 9 Canonical, Debian, Fujitsu and 6 more | 99 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Sparc Enterprise M3000 and 96 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. | |||||