Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Erlang Subscribe
Total 45 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2016-1000107 1 Erlang 1 Erlang\/otp 2026-06-17 5.8 MEDIUM 6.1 MEDIUM
inets in Erlang possibly 22.1 and earlier follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue.
CVE-2015-2774 3 Erlang, Opensuse, Oracle 3 Erlang\/otp, Opensuse, Solaris 2026-06-17 4.3 MEDIUM 5.9 MEDIUM
Erlang/OTP before 18.0-rc1 does not properly check CBC padding bytes when terminating connections, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, a variant of CVE-2014-3566 (aka POODLE).
CVE-2014-1693 1 Erlang 1 Erlang\/otp 2026-06-17 7.5 HIGH N/A
Multiple CRLF injection vulnerabilities in the FTP module in Erlang/OTP R15B03 allow context-dependent attackers to inject arbitrary FTP commands via CRLF sequences in the (1) user, (2) account, (3) cd, (4) ls, (5) nlist, (6) rename, (7) delete, (8) mkdir, (9) rmdir, (10) recv, (11) recv_bin, (12) recv_chunk_start, (13) send, (14) send_bin, (15) send_chunk_start, (16) append_chunk_start, (17) append, or (18) append_bin command.
CVE-2011-0766 2 Erlang, Ssh 3 Crypto, Erlang\/otp, Ssh 2026-06-16 7.8 HIGH N/A
The random number generator in the Crypto application before 2.0.2.2, and SSH before 2.0.5, as used in the Erlang/OTP ssh library before R14B03, uses predictable seeds based on the current time, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess DSA host and SSH session keys.
CVE-2009-0130 1 Erlang 1 Erlang 2026-06-16 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
lib/crypto/c_src/crypto_drv.c in erlang does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_do_verify function, which might allow remote attackers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a malformed SSL/TLS signature, a similar vulnerability to CVE-2008-5077. NOTE: a package maintainer disputes this issue, reporting that there is a proper check within the only code that uses the applicable part of crypto_drv.c, and thus "this report is invalid.