Total
410451 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-14951 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH | ||
| An low privileged remote attacker can cause authenticated users to perform unintended actions in the FDS Web interface using malicious web pages. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14953 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A low-privileged remote attacker can enumerate all configured users and identify which accounts hold elevated privileges using the endpoint /api/user/fetch-all.php. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14948 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| A low privileged remote attacker can hijack an active administrative session without needing to know the administrator password by extracting live plaintext session identifiers for authenticated users from downloadable error log archives. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65085 | 2 Linux, Nvidia | 2 Linux Kernel, Openshell | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.2 MEDIUM |
| NVIDIA OpenShell for Linux contains a vulnerability in its inference proxy, where an attacker could cause an improper encoding or escaping of output. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure and data tampering. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65086 | 2 Linux, Nvidia | 2 Linux Kernel, Openshell | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| NVIDIA OpenShell for Linux contains a vulnerability in its sandbox exec handler, where an attacker could cause an OS command injection. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, information disclosure, and data tampering. | |||||
| CVE-2026-70419 | 1 Dell | 1 Cloud Disaster Recovery | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71171 | 1 Dell | 1 Cloud Disaster Recovery | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in the REST API. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71172 | 1 Dell | 1 Cloud Disaster Recovery | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13505 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series), sensitive key material held by the AES and DESede engines, the SP 800-90A DRBGs, SymmetricSecretKey and the PBKD and scrypt parameter classes was zeroised on garbage collection by overriding Object.finalize. Finalization runs at an unspecified time and in an unspecified order and is serviced by a single finalizer thread, so where objects carrying a finalizer are allocated faster than that thread retires them the pending-finalization queue grows without bound: disposal falls arbitrarily far behind, which can contribute to an OutOfMemoryError under load, and the key material those objects hold stays resident in the heap for as long as they are queued, defeating the purpose of the zeroisation. The behaviour was not a problem on Java 8 or Java 11; it is later JVMs, on which finalization has been deprecated and progressively de-emphasised, where it becomes one. Disposal of these classes now runs from a java.lang.ref.Cleaner registered in the multi-release jdk1.9 overlay, so on Java 9 and later it no longer depends on the finalizer being scheduled. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) and Bouncy Castle for Java LTS are not affected, as neither implements the finalizer-based zeroisation scheme. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8798 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 2.1.3, the native entropy source used on Intel platforms retried the CPU entropy instructions without any bound. RDSEED and RDRAND report failure through their carry flag, and the JNI seeding routine spun re-issuing the instruction for as long as that flag stayed clear, so a persistent failure of the on-chip entropy source - whether from a hardware fault, from the underlying DRBG being exhausted by contention across many cores, or from a hypervisor that does not provide the instruction - left the calling thread looping indefinitely inside the JNI call, where it could be neither interrupted nor timed out. Any operation drawing from the native entropy source could therefore hang, denying service to the application. The retry loops are now bounded (200 attempts for RDSEED and 20 for RDRAND, twice the baselines given in Intel's Digital Random Number Generator software implementation guide), pausing between attempts and, on exhaustion, clearing any partially written buffer and throwing rather than continuing to spin. The clear is performed by an un-elidable memzero, which uses a volatile pointer and an assembly memory barrier so that a compiler cannot optimise the erase away as a dead store. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) is not affected, as it has no native entropy source; the 1.0.X and 2.0.X FIPS series are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14255 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| A maliciously crafted IFC file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can trigger an Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause the application to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial-of-service. Exploitation requires a user to open a specially crafted IFC file. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5304 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM | ||
| An ACAP configuration file lacks input validation, which could potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. | |||||
| CVE-2026-83497 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| Unrestricted deserialization of untrusted data in the cursor pagination component in the OpenSearch SQL plugin allows a remote authenticated user with basic read/search permissions to execute arbitrary code on the server by sending a crafted cursor parameter to the plugins/sql endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6505 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The ACAP framework contains a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition, which could potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. | |||||
| CVE-2026-83551 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Cleartext storage of sensitive information in the @step and @remote decorator pipeline component in Amazon SageMaker Python SDK before v3.11.0 and v2.256.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to extract the HMAC signing key from SageMaker DescribePipeline API responses and forge valid integrity signatures for specially crafted function payloads, achieving code execution in another user's pipeline execution context within the same AWS account. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6181 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM | ||
| The Device Configuration Framework is vulnerable to an authentication bypass flaw. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with a viewer-privileged service account. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8158 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Signed Video Framework contained a buffer overflow issue which could lead the application using this framework to crash. The issue exclusively affects the tools used for the validation of signed content. The AXIS OS device's signed video functionality remains unaffected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4757 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| A VAPIX API parameter had improper input validation which could allow code execution and potentially lead to a privilege escalation. This flaw can only be exploited after authenticating with an administrator-privileged service account. | |||||
| CVE-2026-84851 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| An uncontrolled recursion issue exists in Amazon Ion-C versions before 1.1.6 that might allow a remote unauthenticated actor to craft Ion data that exhausts the native call stack and crashes the application using the library, resulting in a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5303 | 2026-09-03 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM | ||
| The ACAP framework contains a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition, which could potentially lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability can only be exploited if the Axis device is configured to allow the installation of unsigned ACAP applications, and if an attacker convinces the victim to install a malicious ACAP application. | |||||