Total
419343 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-57735 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| When user logged out, the JWT token the user had authtenticated with was not invalidated, which could lead to reuse of that token in case it was intercepted. In Airflow 3.2 we implemented the mechanism that implements token invalidation at logout. Users who are concerned about the logout scenario and possibility of intercepting the tokens, should upgrade to Airflow 3.2+ Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.2.0, which fixes this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54941 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| An example dag `example_dag_decorator` had non-validated parameter that allowed the UI user to redirect the example to a malicious server and execute code on worker. This however required that the example dags are enabled in production (not default) or the example dag code copied to build your own similar dag. If you used the `example_dag_decorator` please review it and apply the changes implemented in Airflow 3.0.5 accordingly. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54831 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Apache Airflow 3 introduced a change to the handling of sensitive information in Connections. The intent was to restrict access to sensitive connection fields to Connection Editing Users, effectively applying a "write-only" model for sensitive values. In Airflow 3.0.3, this model was unintentionally violated: sensitive connection information could be viewed by users with READ permissions through both the API and the UI. This behavior also bypassed the `AIRFLOW__CORE__HIDE_SENSITIVE_VAR_CONN_FIELDS` configuration option. This issue does not affect Airflow 2.x, where exposing sensitive information to connection editors was the intended and documented behavior. Users of Airflow 3.0.3 are advised to upgrade Airflow to >=3.0.4. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54550 | 1 Apache | 1 Airflow | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| The example example_xcom that was included in airflow documentation implemented unsafe pattern of reading value from xcom in the way that could be exploited to allow UI user who had access to modify XComs to perform arbitrary execution of code on the worker. Since the UI users are already highly trusted, this is a Low severity vulnerability. It does not affect Airflow release - example_dags are not supposed to be enabled in production environment, however users following the example could replicate the bad pattern. Documentation of Airflow 3.2.0 contains version of the example with improved resiliance for that case. Users who followed that pattern are advised to adjust their implementations accordingly. | |||||
| CVE-2026-95508 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the DHCPv6 and TFTP response builders of libslirp. When the host is configured with a small interface MTU, a guest-supplied DHCPv6 CLIENTID option or TFTP blksize option can overflow the reply buffer with attacker-controlled content and length, resulting in denial of service and potentially arbitrary code execution in the host process. The default interface MTU is not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-94349 | 1 Dell | 1 Openmanage Enterprise | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2026-94290 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| SUSE Rancher Fleet clusters reference a kubeconfig secret that the controller uses to install and manage a Fleet agent on the target cluster. The controller did not sufficiently restrict which kubeconfig secrets a Fleet Cluster object was allowed to reference. As a result, a Fleet cluster defined in a namespace an ordinary user controls could be associated with administrative credentials for the management cluster itself, causing the controller to manage the management cluster on that user's behalf and to run that user's Fleet content there with elevated privileges. This affects SUSE Rancher Fleet 0.16.0 up to 0.16.3, 0.15.0 up to 0.15.8, 0.14.0 up to 0.14.12, 0.13.0 up to 0.13.17 and possible older versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8923 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH | ||
| Zohocorp ManageEngine Eventlog Analyzer and ManageEngine Log360 versions before 13062 are vulnerable to Authenticated Remote Code Execution in Log Forward option. | |||||
| CVE-2026-88811 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Missing filtering in the SUSE Rancher Manager meta proxy could cause passed in rancher credentials to be leaked to cloud providers. This affects SUSE Rancher 2.15.0 up to 2.15.3, 2.14.0 up to 2.14.7, 2.13.0 up to 2.13.11, | |||||
| CVE-2026-88810 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| A privilege escalation issue was discovered in Rancher Manager's role-based access control. The inheritedNamespacedRules field of a GlobalRole propagates permissions into named namespaces of every downstream cluster managed by the Rancher instance, but it was not subject to the privilege-escalation validation applied to the other permission-carrying fields of a GlobalRole. As a result, a non-administrative user could be granted, through a global role binding, permissions in downstream clusters that exceed the permissions that user already holds. This affected SUSE Rancher 2.15.2 only, and SUSE Rancher Webhook 0.11.0 up to 0.11.4, and 0.12.0 up to 0.12.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-68591 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In Modem, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege (EoP) if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09608864 / ALPS09327759; Issue ID: MSV-2958. | |||||
| CVE-2026-68589 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01320076; Issue ID: MSV-6889. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20599 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In Modem, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01790985; Issue ID: MSV-8148. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20595 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In neuropilot, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11263078; Issue ID: MSV-9001. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20591 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH | ||
| In GPU pdma, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11365075; Issue ID: MSV-9546. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20585 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01338165; Issue ID: MSV-9660. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20584 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In usb, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11411916; Issue ID: MSV-9746. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20582 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In usb, there is a possible memory corruption due to double free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11411924; Issue ID: MSV-9748. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20581 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In usb, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11411985; Issue ID: MSV-9750. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20576 | 2026-11-03 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| In afe, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11431385; Issue ID: MSV-9920. | |||||