Filtered by vendor Google
Subscribe
Total
16604 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48545 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| In isSystemUid of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way for an app to access privileged APIs due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local privilege escalation with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48544 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files belonging to other apps due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48543 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to escape chrome sandbox to attack android system_server due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48542 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple functions of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48541 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onCreate of FaceSettings.java, there is a possible way to remove biometric unlock across user profiles due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48540 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In processTransactInternal of RpcState.cpp, there is a possible local out of memory write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48539 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| In SendPacketToPeer of acl_arbiter.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a use after free. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48538 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In setApplicationHiddenSettingAsUser of PackageManagerService.java, there is a possible way to hide a system critical package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48537 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to persistently DoS the device due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48536 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In grantAllowlistedPackagePermissions of SettingsSliceProvider.java, there is a possible way for a third party app to modify secure settings due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48535 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java , there is a possible way to exploit a parcel mismatch resulting in a launch anywhere vulnerability due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48534 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| In getDefaultCBRPackageName of CellBroadcastHandler.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48533 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to use apps linked from a context menu of a lockscreen app due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48532 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| In markMediaAsFavorite of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way to bypass the WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48531 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In getCallingPackageName of CredentialStorage, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48530 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible condition that results in OOB accesses due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution in combination with other bugs, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48529 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In setRingtoneUri of VoicemailNotificationSettingsUtil.java , there is a possible cross user data leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48528 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay biometrics due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48527 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to leak hidden work profile notifications due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48526 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In createMultiProfilePagerAdapter of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way for an app to launch the ChooserActivity in another profile due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||