Total
398874 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-36890 | 1 Kentico | 1 Xperience | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| An access control bypass vulnerability in Kentico Xperience allows administrators to modify global administrator user privileges via unauthorized requests. Attackers could potentially compromise global administrator accounts and invalidate security-sensitive macros by manipulating user privilege levels. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66298 | 1 Livebook | 1 Livebook | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Origin Validation Error vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows untrusted notebook output JavaScript to trigger session-wide keyboard shortcuts, including forced evaluation of all cells and runtime restart. Livebook's JS-view feature renders notebook-defined JavaScript inside a sandboxed, cross-origin iframe specifically because that JavaScript is untrusted. The trusted iframe shell in iframe/priv/static/iframe/v5.html forwards every keydown event fired in its own window to the parent page without consulting Event.isTrusted, so an event synthesized by the untrusted script through window.dispatchEvent is forwarded exactly as a genuine keystroke would be. The parent-side relay in assets/js/hooks/js_view.js reconstructs and re-dispatches it on the live page with no further validation, and because assets/js/hooks/session.js registers the global shortcut handler on the document in the capture phase, that handler acts on the replicated event regardless of how it was produced. Sandboxed output JavaScript can therefore drive Livebook's session-wide keyboard shortcuts. Two of them reach LivebookWeb.SessionLive and execute immediately with no confirmation: the shortcut for queueing full evaluation runs every cell in the notebook, and the shortcut for reconnecting the runtime disconnects and reconnects it, discarding in-memory state. A third shortcut deletes the focused cell behind a confirmation dialog that the user can permanently dismiss, after which it too executes silently. Forced full evaluation is the significant consequence, because it causes the notebook's own Elixir code to run without the user choosing to evaluate anything. A user who merely opens a notebook obtained from a third party, or reached from published documentation, can have its code executed on their runtime. Livebook also mirrors cell outputs to every connected client, so a malicious output triggers in a collaborator's browser as soon as it renders. This issue affects livebook: from 0.5.0 before 0.18.7 and from 0.19.0 before 0.19.9. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66881 | 1 Livebook | 1 Livebook | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows an attacker-authored notebook to write a file with attacker-controlled content to an arbitrary path. A .livemd notebook can declare file_entries metadata, each entry carrying a name. Every path that creates a file entry through the user interface validates that name with Livebook.Notebook.validate_file_entry_name/2, which requires a flat filename of alphanumerics, dashes, underscores and dots, ending in an extension. The import path does not: Livebook.LiveMarkdown.Import.file_entry_metadata_to_attrs/1 in lib/livebook/live_markdown/import.ex takes the name verbatim from the notebook source. For a URL-type file entry, Livebook.Session.file_entry_cache_file/2 in lib/livebook/session.ex resolves that name beneath the session's temporary directory without checking that the result stays inside it, and Livebook.FileSystem.Utils.resolve_unix_like_path/2 collapses parent-directory segments while clamping only at the filesystem root. When the entry's content is requested and no cached copy exists, Livebook fetches the entry's URL and writes the response body to the resolved path, creating parent directories as needed. The attacker therefore controls both the destination and the contents of the written file, which may land anywhere the Livebook process can write. The same missing containment check is present in Livebook.Session.to_attachment_file_entry/2. A victim who opens an attacker-supplied notebook and causes the entry to be fetched triggers the write within their own authenticated session; the attacker needs no account on the target instance. URL-type entries are also not placed under notebook stamping quarantine on import, so no warning is shown. This issue affects livebook: from 0.11.0 before 0.18.7 and from 0.19.0 before 0.19.9. | |||||
| CVE-2026-63457 | 1 Hpe | 2 Integrated Lights-out 6, Integrated Lights-out 6 Firmware | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A potential denial of service vulnerability exists in HPE Integrated Lights-Out 6 (iLO 6) prior to v1.78. | |||||
| CVE-2026-17617 | 1 Ibm | 1 Application Gateway Operator | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 8.5 HIGH |
| IBM Application Gateway Operator 22.2 through 26.06 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient validation of URLs specified in custom resources. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13477 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| IBM QRadar 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.1, and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP 15 Interim Fix 005 could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. | |||||
| CVE-2026-46581 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Mojarra | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Mojarra versions 2.3 and following, URL handing in `DefaultFaceletFactory` does not properly sanitize and/or block remote URLs, allowing an attacker to specify a URL to a remote Facelet which will be included and processed as part of the normal request, with the privileges of the target server. This could allow access to restricted files such as `WEB-INF/web.xml` or `/etc/passwd`. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6788 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Agent | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Using Malicious Files. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6787 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Agent | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key vulnerability in WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows Inclusion of Code in Existing Process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41288 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Agent | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Incorrect permission assignment for a resource in the patch management component of the WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows an authenticated local user to elevate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41287 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Agent | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnerability to crash the agent service. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41286 | 1 Watchguard | 1 Agent | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnerability to crash the agent service. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40512 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3344 | 1 Watchguard | 39 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 36 more | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow an attacker to bypass the Fireware OS filesystem integrity check and maintain limited persistence via a maliciously-crafted firmware update package. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3343 | 1 Watchguard | 37 Firebox M270, Firebox M290, Firebox M295 and 34 more | 2026-08-10 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Fireware OS Web UI enabled execution of malicious JavaScript in the context of an authenticated management user's browser when they click on a specially crafted link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35028 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35027 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35026 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35006 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35005 | 2026-08-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | |||||