Total
398446 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-71255 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH | ||
| nanoMODBUS through v1.23.0 contains an out-of-bounds write in the Modbus client-side recv_read_device_identification_res function (FC 0x2B/MEI 0x0E, Read Device Identification) in nanomodbus.c. The server-supplied object_length field (0-246) is validated only against the remaining PDU size (res_size_left) and is never validated against the caller-supplied buffers_length parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71275 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| OpenBK7231T's http_fn_ota_exec() (src/httpserver/http_fns.c) reflects the `host` query parameter directly into an HTML response via hprintf255(request, "<h3>OTA requested for %s!</h3>", tmpA) with no HTML encoding, allowing a crafted URL such as /ota_exec?host=<script>alert(1)</script> to execute JavaScript in an authenticated admin's browser when they click a malicious link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71260 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| ESPHome through 2026.7.0-dev discloses plaintext passwords via its web_server component. In WebServer::text_json_ (esphome/components/web_server/web_server.cpp), a text entity configured with mode: password (TEXT_MODE_PASSWORD) has its JSON "state" field correctly masked as "********", but the same serialization path unconditionally writes the raw password into the JSON "value" field via set_json_icon_state_value/set_json_value. | |||||
| CVE-2026-62608 | 1 Oracle | 1 Reports Developer | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Security and Authentication). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.19.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via CORBA to compromise Oracle Reports Developer. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Reports Developer, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Reports Developer. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | |||||
| CVE-2024-14041 | 1 Bouncycastle | 1 Bc-java | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java from 1.73 to before 1.78, three ML-KEM (CRYSTALS-Kyber) routines divided secret-derived polynomial coefficients by the modulus q: Poly.toMsg, which decodes the decrypted message, and the ciphertext compression routines Poly.compressPoly and PolyVec.compressPolyVec. An attacker able to measure the timing of a large number of decapsulations performed with the same long-term private key can recover that key. These are the KyberSlash1 (Poly.toMsg) and KyberSlash2 (ciphertext compression) divisions. Compression performed during encapsulation operates on values that become the public ciphertext and is not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-74793 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| justhtml before 3.11.0 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability where the default sanitizer bypasses event handler removal in selectedcontent projections. Attackers can inject SVG or MathML elements with event handlers that are cloned and reinserted into output without sanitization, enabling stored or reflected XSS attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78204 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Ghostwriter through 7.2.6 does not apply per-object authorization on its report template lint endpoints. RoleBasedAccessControlMixin.test_func returns only request.user.is_active unless a view overrides it, and neither the endpoint that lints a report template nor the endpoint that returns stored lint results provides an override, so each resolves a ReportTemplate from a caller-supplied primary key with no ownership or client-scope check. Any authenticated account can therefore lint an arbitrary template, which overwrites that template's stored lint result, and can read the returned findings, which enumerate the template's variable names and template-engine errors and so disclose its structure. This is distinct from the template swap path: that endpoint authorizes the report but omits the per-template check, whereas these endpoints omit authorization entirely and remain unfixed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5751 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| justhtml versions 1.13.0 and earlier contain a parser-differential / mutation cross-site scripting (mXSS) vulnerability when using a custom SanitizationPolicy that preserves foreign namespaces (e.g., drop_foreign_namespaces=False with allowlisted SVG/MathML elements or raw-text containers such as <style>). Specially crafted input can sanitize into markup that appears safe but becomes unsafe when re-parsed by a browser or another HTML parser, allowing markup injection. The default safe configuration (sanitize=True) is not affected. Fixed in 1.14.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7808 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| justhtml before 1.16.0 contains multiple HTML sanitization bypass issues that can allow active/dangerous content (e.g., script or style) to survive sanitization, potentially leading to cross-site scripting. The issues primarily affect advanced usage rather than the default JustHTML(..., sanitize=True) path for ordinary parsed HTML: mutating or reusing sanitization policy objects (including exported defaults) could weaken later sanitization; programmatic DOM input to sanitize()/sanitize_dom() could miss mixed-case tag names (e.g., ScRiPt, StYlE); crafted programmatic doctype names could serialize into active markup; and custom policies preserving SVG or MathML could allow animation elements, presentation attributes with external url(...) references, or DOM trees mislabeled as namespace="html" to bypass foreign-content checks. Fixed in 1.16.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8445 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| justhtml versions <= 1.11.0 (fixed in 1.12.0) do not sufficiently escape HTML-significant characters (angle brackets) in text nodes when converting a parsed document to Markdown via to_markdown(). While a small set of Markdown metacharacters are escaped, characters such as < and > are preserved, so untrusted input that is safe in to_html() — including entity-decoded text (e.g. <script>) or text from RCDATA/RAWTEXT-parsed elements like <title>, <textarea>, <noscript>, and <plaintext> — can be emitted as raw HTML in the Markdown output, enabling a sanitizer bypass and potential cross-site scripting when that output is rendered. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4671 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| justhtml before 1.18.0 contains multiple low-severity denial-of-service issues in CSS selector handling and linkification. Applications that evaluate attacker-controlled selector strings (via query(), matches(), or selector-based transforms), run selector matching over very large untrusted documents, construct DOM trees from untrusted structure, or enable linkification over attacker-controlled text may consume disproportionate CPU or memory. Triggers include oversized selectors, large selector lists, oversized compound selectors, long combinator chains, deeply nested functional pseudo-classes, repeated token/positional matching, cyclic DOM graphs causing non-terminating traversal, and punctuation-heavy or trailing-bracket linkification input. These are availability-only concerns and do not by themselves allow script execution, data disclosure, or sanitizer bypass. Default JustHTML(sanitize=True) usage is not expected to be exposed, since selectors are normally supplied by application code. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5389 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| justhtml versions before 1.13.0 contain a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the to_markdown() function when serializing attacker-controlled pre content. Attackers can place backticks inside sanitized pre elements to break out of fixed-length code fences, allowing raw HTML to execute when the generated Markdown is rendered by CommonMark or GFM-style renderers. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9769 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| justhtml through 1.9.1 (fixed in 1.10.0) is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion leading to denial of service. During JustHTML() construction, TreeBuilder.finish() unconditionally calls _populate_selectedcontent(), which recursively traverses the DOM tree via _find_elements()/_find_element() without a depth bound. An attacker who can supply HTML for parsing can provide deeply nested elements (e.g., ~1000 nested <div> tags, roughly 11 KB) to exceed CPython's default recursion limit and trigger an unhandled RecursionError, which may abort parsing, fail requests, or terminate a worker/process depending on the host application's exception handling. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71919 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the sysreboot function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the config, act, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | |||||
| CVE-2026-58002 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8b4c1f75540788d6b391740852ceb0732 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the Users_affiliations add.json.php endpoint that allows authenticated users to forge two-party consent records by supplying the counterparty's agreement timestamp. Attackers can create a forged affiliation with status='a' and then reassign video ownership to arbitrary users through the videoAddNew.json.php endpoint, which trusts the forged affiliation as an authorization term. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71917 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the host field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71910 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the CMD0, CMD3, and CMD6 fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71912 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71907 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setcamset function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the selectSlaves field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface. | |||||
| CVE-2026-71914 | 2026-08-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the dray_apm component. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of UDP message content after START_SPEED_TEST before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted message to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. | |||||