Total
425358 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-39958 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Owasp | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Owasp Modsecurity Core Rule Set | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) is affected by a response body bypass to sequentially exfiltrate small and undetectable sections of data by repeatedly submitting an HTTP Range header field with a small byte range. A restricted resource, access to which would ordinarily be detected, may be exfiltrated from the backend, despite being protected by a web application firewall that uses CRS. Short subsections of a restricted resource may bypass pattern matching techniques and allow undetected access. The legacy CRS versions 3.0.x and 3.1.x are affected, as well as the currently supported versions 3.2.1 and 3.3.2. Integrators and users are advised to upgrade to 3.2.2 and 3.3.3 respectively and to configure a CRS paranoia level of 3 or higher. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39957 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Owasp | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Owasp Modsecurity Core Rule Set | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| The OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) is affected by a response body bypass. A client can issue an HTTP Accept header field containing an optional "charset" parameter in order to receive the response in an encoded form. Depending on the "charset", this response can not be decoded by the web application firewall. A restricted resource, access to which would ordinarily be detected, may therefore bypass detection. The legacy CRS versions 3.0.x and 3.1.x are affected, as well as the currently supported versions 3.2.1 and 3.3.2. Integrators and users are advised to upgrade to 3.2.2 and 3.3.3 respectively. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39956 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Owasp | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Owasp Modsecurity Core Rule Set | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| The OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) is affected by a partial rule set bypass for HTTP multipart requests by submitting a payload that uses a character encoding scheme via the Content-Type or the deprecated Content-Transfer-Encoding multipart MIME header fields that will not be decoded and inspected by the web application firewall engine and the rule set. The multipart payload will therefore bypass detection. A vulnerable backend that supports these encoding schemes can potentially be exploited. The legacy CRS versions 3.0.x and 3.1.x are affected, as well as the currently supported versions 3.2.1 and 3.3.2. Integrators and users are advised upgrade to 3.2.2 and 3.3.3 respectively. The mitigation against these vulnerabilities depends on the installation of the latest ModSecurity version (v2.9.6 / v3.0.8). | |||||
| CVE-2022-39955 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Owasp | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Owasp Modsecurity Core Rule Set | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| The OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) is affected by a partial rule set bypass by submitting a specially crafted HTTP Content-Type header field that indicates multiple character encoding schemes. A vulnerable back-end can potentially be exploited by declaring multiple Content-Type "charset" names and therefore bypassing the configurable CRS Content-Type header "charset" allow list. An encoded payload can bypass CRS detection this way and may then be decoded by the backend. The legacy CRS versions 3.0.x and 3.1.x are affected, as well as the currently supported versions 3.2.1 and 3.3.2. Integrators and users are advised to upgrade to 3.2.2 and 3.3.3 respectively. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39954 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortinac, Fortinac-f | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| An improper restriction of xml external entity reference in Fortinet FortiNAC version 9.4.0 through 9.4.1, FortiNAC version 9.2.0 through 9.2.7, FortiNAC version 9.1.0 through 9.1.8, FortiNAC version 8.8.0 through 8.8.11, FortiNAC version 8.7.0 through 8.7.6, FortiNAC version 8.6.0 through 8.6.5, FortiNAC version 8.5.0 through 8.5.4, FortiNAC version 8.3.7 allows attacker to read arbitrary files or trigger a denial of service via specifically crafted XML documents. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39953 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortinac | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A improper privilege management in Fortinet FortiNAC version 9.4.0 through 9.4.1, FortiNAC version 9.2.0 through 9.2.6, FortiNAC version 9.1.0 through 9.1.8, FortiNAC all versions 8.8, FortiNAC all versions 8.7, FortiNAC all versions 8.6, FortiNAC all versions 8.5, FortiNAC version 8.3.7 allows attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted commands. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39952 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortinac | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A external control of file name or path in Fortinet FortiNAC versions 9.4.0, 9.2.0 through 9.2.5, 9.1.0 through 9.1.7, 8.8.0 through 8.8.11, 8.7.0 through 8.7.6, 8.6.0 through 8.6.5, 8.5.0 through 8.5.4, 8.3.7 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP request. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39951 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, FortiWeb version 6.3.6 through 6.3.20, FortiWeb 6.4 all versions allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39950 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| An improper neutralization of input during web page generation vulnerability [CWE-79] exists in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer 6.0.0 all versions, 6.2.0 all versions, 6.4.0 through 6.4.8, and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4. Report templates may allow a low privilege level attacker to perform an XSS attack via posting a crafted CKeditor "protected" comment as described in CVE-2020-9281. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39949 | 2 Fortinet, Microsoft | 2 Fortiedr, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| An improper control of a resource through its lifetime vulnerability [CWE-664] in FortiEDR CollectorWindows 4.0.0 through 4.1, 5.0.0 through 5.0.3.751, 5.1.0 may allow a privileged user to terminate the FortiEDR processes with special tools and bypass the EDR protection. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39948 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy) | |||||
| CVE-2022-39947 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, FortiADC version 6.2.0 through 6.2.3, FortiADC version version 6.1.0 through 6.1.6, FortiADC version 6.0.0 through 6.0.4, FortiADC version 5.4.0 through 5.4.5 may allow an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39946 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortinac | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| An access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiNAC version 9.4.2 and below, version 9.2.7 and below, 9.1 all versions, 8.8 all versions, 8.7 all versions, 8.6 all versions, 8.5 all versions may allow a remote attacker authenticated on the administrative interface to perform unauthorized jsp calls via crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39945 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiMail 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions may allow an authenticated admin user assigned to a specific domain to access and modify other domains information via insecure direct object references (IDOR). | |||||
| CVE-2022-39944 | 1 Apache | 1 Linkis | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Apache Linkis <=1.2.0 when used with the MySQL Connector/J, a deserialization vulnerability with possible remote code execution impact exists when an attacker has write access to a database and configures a JDBC EC with a MySQL data source and malicious parameters. Therefore, the parameters in the jdbc url should be blacklisted. Versions of Apache Linkis <= 1.2.0 will be affected, We recommend users to update to 1.3.0. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39915 | 2 Google, Samsung | 2 Android, Calendar | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| Improper access control vulnerability in Calendar prior to versions 11.6.08.0 in Android Q(10), 12.2.11.3000 in Android R(11), 12.3.07.2000 in Android S(12), and 12.4.02.0 in Android T(13) allows attackers to access sensitive information via implicit intent. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39914 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information from an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Samsung DisplayManagerService prior to Android T(13) allows local attacker to access connected DLNA device information. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39913 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in Persona Manager prior to Android T(13) allows local attacker to access user profiles information. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39912 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| Improper handling of insufficient permissions vulnerability in setSecureFolderPolicy in PersonaManagerService prior to Android T(13) allows local attackers to set some setting value in Secure folder. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39911 | 1 Samsung | 1 Pass | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Improper check or handling of exceptional conditions vulnerability in Samsung Pass prior to version 4.0.06.1 allows attacker to access Samsung Pass. | |||||