Total
7598 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-68770 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| sentence-transformers contains a security control bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by exploiting a logic flaw in the import_module_class helper within sentence_transformers/util/misc.py, where the guard condition includes an 'or os.path.exists(model_name_or_path)' clause that satisfies the trust gate whenever the supplied path exists on the local filesystem, regardless of the trust_remote_code=False argument. Attackers who can control or influence the contents of a model directory on disk can place malicious Python files such as modeling_*.py referenced via modules.json, causing the code to execute at import time when an application loads the model with SentenceTransformer(path, trust_remote_code=False), bypassing the documented security contract and achieving code execution within the loading process. | |||||
| CVE-2026-51785 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| An issue in Hugo Leisink Hiawatha v.12.1 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request | |||||
| CVE-2026-18770 | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in vibesurf-ai VibeSurf up to cd6e519d507cdd4d63061300bf60fb176e1f57e0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /code of the component Python Validation Handler. The manipulation leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-54621 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH | ||
| datamodel-code-generator generates Python data models from schema definitions. Prior to 0.60.1, GraphQL Union description values in src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/UnionTypeStatement.jinja2 and src/datamodel_code_generator/model/template/UnionTypeStatement.py312.jinja2 are rendered into Python comments without neutralizing carriage returns in Python # comments, allowing attacker-controlled GraphQL schema content to inject Python code into generated models that runs when imported. This issue is fixed in version 0.60.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65804 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-69254 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.3, executeJavaScriptCode() accepted caller-provided nodeVMOptions and merged them over the default NodeVM security settings in packages/components/src/utils.ts. An authenticated attacker reaching packages/server/src/routes/node-custom-functions/index.ts could run a custom function that imported flowise-components/dist/src/utils.js, called executeJavaScriptCode() again with nodeVMOptions.require.builtin set to allow all built-in modules, and then required child_process to execute arbitrary system commands as root on the Flowise server. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-54666 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH | ||
| swagger-typescript-api generates API clients for Fetch or Axios from an OpenAPI Specification. Prior to 13.12.2, src/schema-routes/schema-routes.ts passes OpenAPI path keys through parseRouteName to templates/default/procedure-call.ejs and templates/modular/procedure-call.ejs without escaping JavaScript template literal interpolation, allowing an attacker-controlled path containing ${...} to execute when the generated method is called. This issue is fixed in version 13.12.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-17922 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in Enterprise in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-67282 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - fabrikar.com - Unauthenticated remote code execution in Fabrik < 4.6.8 - An unauthenticated attacker could execute arbitrary code by using the frontend listfilter model. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18245 | 1 Amazon | 1 Amplify Codegen Ui | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| Improper control of code generation in Amazon @aws-amplify/codegen-ui-react before 2.20.6 might allow a remote authenticated user to execute arbitrary code in end-user browsers, developer machines, CI/CD environments, and server-side rendering contexts via crafted Studio component or theme schema values due to insufficient coverage and effectiveness of the input validation introduced for CVE-2025-4318. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 2.20.6 | |||||
| CVE-2026-67340 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 (arcadedb-engine) allows trigger scripts to look up host classes in java.lang.* (via Java.type) because ScriptTriggerExecutor adds java.lang.* to the allowed packages. An authenticated user with UPDATE_SCHEMA permission can create a JavaScript trigger that invokes java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec() (or ProcessBuilder), achieving OS command execution when the trigger fires. | |||||
| CVE-2026-13435 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the PythonREPL sandbox implementation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-76604 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - fabrikar.com - Unauthenticated remote code execution via PHP form element in Fabrik < 4.7.2 - The PHP form element is vulnerable to the execution of user provided codes. | |||||
| CVE-2026-61536 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a simple template language. In versions prior to 2.4.3, banks parses Tool JSON objects from the rendered body of {% completion %} blocks and later resolves their import_path field through importlib.import_module(...) + getattr(...) to obtain the callable that handles a tool call. There is no allowlist or sanitization on import_path, so any importable Python attribute (e.g. os.system, subprocess.getoutput) can be selected. When the LLM emits a tool_calls entry whose function.name matches the attacker-supplied tool name, the resolved callable is invoked with kwargs decoded from tool_call.function.arguments, yielding arbitrary code execution in the banks-hosting process. This is distinct from GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp / CVE-2026-44209. That advisory was fixed in 2.4.2 by switching src/banks/env.py from Environment to SandboxedEnvironment. The fix does not touch src/banks/extensions/completion.py, and the unsafe import + getattr chain still executes on 2.4.2. The malicious Tool JSON is plain text in the rendered template body — it requires no Jinja attribute access, so the sandbox is irrelevant. This issue has been fixed in version 2.4.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66915 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - fabrikar.com - Remote code execution in Fabrik < 4.7.2 - An unauthenticated attacker could execute arbitrary code by using the ajax_calc feature of the calc plugin. | |||||
| CVE-2026-74253 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - Unauthenticated RCE through unverified reflected user input in Sourcerer < 16.0.0 - Regular Labs Sourcerer before 16.0.0 processes {source} blocks found in Joomla’s final rendered HTML without reliably determining where that code originated. | |||||
| CVE-2026-77992 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Joomla Extension - fabrikar.com - heredoc terminator breakout in the calc element in Fabrik < 4.7.2 - The onUpdateComment endpoint did not perform any access checks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-73343 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL | ||
| Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in WP Compress < 7.20.01 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-12946 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-10-23 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59042 | 2026-10-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| PyInstaller bundles a Python application and all its dependencies into a single package. Due to a special entry being appended to `sys.path` during the bootstrap process of a PyInstaller-frozen application, and due to the bootstrap script attempting to load an optional module for bytecode decryption while this entry is still present in `sys.path`, an application built with PyInstaller < 6.0.0 may be tricked by an unprivileged attacker into executing arbitrary python code when **all** of the following conditions are met. First, the application is built with PyInstaller < 6.0.0; both onedir and onefile mode are affected. Second, the optional bytecode encryption code feature was not enabled during the application build. Third, the attacker can create files/directories in the same directory where the executable is located. Fourth, the filesystem supports creation of files/directories that contain `?` in their name (i.e., non-Windows systems). Fifth, the attacker is able to determine the offset at which the PYZ archive is embedded in the executable. The attacker can create a directory (or a zip archive) next to the executable, with the name that matches the format used by PyInstaller's bootloader to transmit information about the location of PYZ archive to the bootstrap script. If this directory (or zip archive) contains a python module whose name matches the name used by the optional bytecode encryption feature, this module will be loaded and executed by the bootstrap script (in the absence of the real, built-in module that is available when the bytecode-encryption feature is enabled). This results in arbitrary code execution that requires no modification of the executable itself. If the executable is running with elevated privileges (for example, due to having the `setuid` bit set), the code in the injected module is also executed with the said elevated privileges, resulting in a local privilege escalation. PyInstaller 6.0.0 (f5adf291c8b832d5aff7632844f7e3ddf7ad4923) removed support for bytecode encryption; this effectively removes the described attack vector, due to the bootstrap script not attempting to load the optional module for bytecode-decryption anymore. PyInstaller 6.10.0 (cfd60b510f95f92cb81fc42735c399bb781a4739) reworked the bootstrap process to avoid (ab)using `sys.path` for transmitting location of the PYZ archive, which further eliminates the possibility of described injection procedure. If upgrading PyInstaller is not feasible, this issue can be worked around by ensuring proper permissions on directories containing security-sensitive executables (i.e., executables with `setuid` bit set) should mitigate the issue. | |||||