Total
280 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-45302 | 1 Restsharp | 1 Restsharp | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| RestSharp is a Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET. The second argument to `RestRequest.AddHeader` (the header value) is vulnerable to CRLF injection. The same applies to `RestRequest.AddOrUpdateHeader` and `RestClient.AddDefaultHeader`. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method which does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers from a `RestSharp.RequestHeaders` object are added to the request in such a way that they are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the RestSharp library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using RestSharp, not in RestSharp itself, but I would argue that at the very least there needs to be a warning about this behaviour in the RestSharp documentation. RestSharp has addressed this issue in version 112.0.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40324 | 1 Datex-soft | 1 E-staff | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability in E-Staff v5.1 allows attackers to insert Carriage Return (CR) and Line Feed (LF) characters into input fields, leading to HTTP response splitting and header manipulation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-36459 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A CRLF cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in certain configurations of the SiteMinder Web Agent for IIS Web Server and SiteMinder Web Agent for Domino Web Server. As a result, an attacker can execute arbitrary Javascript code in a client browser. | |||||
| CVE-2024-32986 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| PWAsForFirefox is a tool to install, manage and use Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) in Mozilla Firefox. Due to improper sanitization of web app properties (such as name, description, shortcuts), web apps were able to inject additional lines into XDG Desktop Entries (on Linux) and `AppInfo.ini` (on PortableApps.com). This allowed malicious web apps to introduce keys like `Exec`, which could run arbitrary code when the affected web app was launched. This vulnerability affects all Linux and PortableApps.com users of all PWAsForFirefox versions up to (excluding) 2.12.0. Windows and macOS users are not affected. This vulnerability has been fixed in commit `9932d4b` which has been included in release in v2.12.0. The main fix is implemented in the native part, but the extension also contains additional fixes. All Linux and PortableApps.com users are advised to update to this version as soon as possible. It is also recommended for Windows and macOS users to update to this version, as it contains additional fixes related to properties sanitization. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20337 | 4 Apple, Cisco, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Secure Client, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the SAML authentication process of Cisco Secure Client could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a carriage return line feed (CRLF) injection attack against a user. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link while establishing a VPN session. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the browser or access sensitive, browser-based information, including a valid SAML token. The attacker could then use the token to establish a remote access VPN session with the privileges of the affected user. Individual hosts and services behind the VPN headend would still need additional credentials for successful access. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1226 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| The software does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes certain characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers. The inclusion of invalidated data in an HTTP header allows an attacker to specify the full HTTP response represented by the browser. An attacker could control the response and craft attacks such as cross-site scripting and cache poisoning attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2023-4768 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Desktop Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability has been found in ManageEngine Desktop Central affecting version 9.1.0. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and perform HTTP response splitting attacks via the fileName parameter in /STATE_ID/1613157927228/InvSWMetering.pdf. | |||||
| CVE-2023-4767 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Desktop Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability has been found in ManageEngine Desktop Central affecting version 9.1.0. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and perform HTTP response splitting attacks via the fileName parameter in /STATE_ID/1613157927228/InvSWMetering.csv. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38551 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| A CRLF Injection vulnerability in Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) allows an authenticated high-privileged user to inject malicious code on a victim’s browser, thereby leading to cross-site scripting attack. | |||||
| CVE-2023-34472 | 1 Ami | 1 Megarac Sp-x | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| AMI SPx contains a vulnerability in the BMC where an Attacker may cause an improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP Headers. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to a loss of integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26148 | 1 Ithewei | 1 Libhv | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| All versions of the package ithewei/libhv are vulnerable to CRLF Injection when untrusted user input is used to set request headers. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters and inject additional headers in the request sent. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26138 | 1 Drogon | 1 Drogon | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| All versions of the package drogonframework/drogon are vulnerable to CRLF Injection when untrusted user input is used to set request headers in the addHeader function. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters and inject additional headers in the request sent. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26130 | 1 Cpp-httplib Project | 1 Cpp-httplib | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Versions of the package yhirose/cpp-httplib before 0.12.4 are vulnerable to CRLF Injection when untrusted user input is used to set the content-type header in the HTTP .Patch, .Post, .Put and .Delete requests. This can lead to logical errors and other misbehaviors. **Note:** This issue is present due to an incomplete fix for [CVE-2020-11709](https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-UNMANAGED-YHIROSECPPHTTPLIB-2366507). | |||||
| CVE-2023-23936 | 1 Nodejs | 2 Node.js, Undici | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client for Node.js. Starting with version 2.0.0 and prior to version 5.19.1, the undici library does not protect `host` HTTP header from CRLF injection vulnerabilities. This issue is patched in Undici v5.19.1. As a workaround, sanitize the `headers.host` string before passing to undici. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0040 | 1 Asynchttpclient Project | 1 Async-http-client | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Versions of Async HTTP Client prior to 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a form of targeted request manipulation called CRLF injection. This vulnerability was the result of insufficient validation of HTTP header field values before sending them to the network. Users are vulnerable if they pass untrusted data into HTTP header field values without prior sanitisation. Common use-cases here might be to place usernames from a database into HTTP header fields. This vulnerability allows attackers to inject new HTTP header fields, or entirely new requests, into the data stream. This can cause requests to be understood very differently by the remote server than was intended. In general, this is unlikely to result in data disclosure, but it can result in a number of logical errors and other misbehaviours. | |||||
| CVE-2022-50682 | 1 Kentico | 1 Xperience | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A CRLF injection vulnerability in Kentico Xperience allows attackers to manipulate URL query string redirects via improper encoding in the routing engine. This could enable header injection and potentially facilitate further web application attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35948 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Undici | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`=< undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from 'undici' const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = 'application/json\r\n\r\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1' await request('http://localhost:3000, { method: 'GET', headers: { 'content-type': unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1. Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input as a workaround. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31150 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Undici | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js. It is possible to inject CRLF sequences into request headers in undici in versions less than 5.7.1. A fix was released in version 5.8.0. Sanitizing all HTTP headers from untrusted sources to eliminate `\r\n` is a workaround for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-31014 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2026-06-17 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud server is an open source personal cloud server. Affected versions were found to be vulnerable to SMTP command injection. The impact varies based on which commands are supported by the backend SMTP server. However, the main risk here is that the attacker can then hijack an already-authenticated SMTP session and run arbitrary SMTP commands as the email user, such as sending emails to other users, changing the FROM user, and so on. As before, this depends on the configuration of the server itself, but newlines should be sanitized to mitigate such arbitrary SMTP command injection. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 22.2.8 , 23.0.5 or 24.0.1. There are no known workarounds for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0666 | 1 Microweber | 1 Microweber | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| CRLF Injection leads to Stack Trace Exposure due to lack of filtering at https://demo.microweber.org/ in Packagist microweber/microweber prior to 1.2.11. | |||||