Total
4032 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-72855 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 8.5 HIGH | ||
| Budibase before 3.40.0 contains server-side request forgery vulnerabilities in OpenAPI query import and REST query execution that allow authenticated builder-level users to bypass DNS pinning protections through DNS rebinding attacks. Attackers can configure hostnames that resolve to public addresses during validation but resolve to loopback or private addresses during actual connection, allowing access to blocked internal HTTP services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-63306 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH | ||
| stoatchat before 0.13.5 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy and /embed endpoints that accept arbitrary URLs without DNS resolution filtering or private IP range validation. Attackers can enumerate internal services, fingerprint applications, and reach instance metadata endpoints by supplying malicious URLs or leveraging redirect chains to access internal infrastructure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-49138 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM | ||
| Nanobot prior to version 0.2.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the web_fetch tool that allows remote attackers to reach internal or private network hosts by supplying a URL that redirects to a loopback or private address via a 3xx Location header. Attackers can exploit the automatic HTTP redirect following behavior in the httpx library to bypass initial URL validation and cause the runtime to send outbound requests to internal hosts before final resolved URL validation is applied. | |||||
| CVE-2026-48555 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| Spatie Laravel Media Library before version 11.23.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to cause the server to issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests by passing user-controlled URLs to the addMediaFromUrl() method in InteractsWithMedia.php. | |||||
| CVE-2026-39922 | 1 Geosolutionsgroup | 1 Geonode | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| GeoNode versions 4.4.5 and 5.0.2 (and prior within their respective releases) contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the service registration endpoint that allows authenticated attackers to trigger outbound network requests to arbitrary URLs by submitting a crafted service URL during form validation. Attackers can probe internal network targets including loopback addresses, RFC1918 private IP ranges, link-local addresses, and cloud metadata services by exploiting insufficient URL validation in the WMS service handler without private IP filtering or allowlist enforcement. | |||||
| CVE-2026-34966 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH | ||
| Gitea prior to 1.27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to bypass SSRF protections by exploiting HTTP fetch operations in migration and OAuth avatar code paths that use Go's default http.Get without a custom DialContext. Attackers can supply arbitrary URLs through release asset download URLs, pull-request patch URLs, or OAuth avatar endpoints to reach internal services, cloud instance-metadata endpoints, or read local files such as the application configuration containing database credentials and signing secrets, with exfiltrated content persisted as migration release assets for later retrieval. | |||||
| CVE-2026-22219 | 1 Chainlit | 1 Chainlit | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| Chainlit versions prior to 2.9.4 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /project/element update flow when configured with the SQLAlchemy data layer backend. An authenticated client can provide a user-controlled url value in an Element, which is fetched by the SQLAlchemy element creation logic using an outbound HTTP GET request. This allows an attacker to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the Chainlit server to internal network services or cloud metadata endpoints and store the retrieved responses via the configured storage provider. | |||||
| CVE-2026-100681 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Budibase before 3.45.0 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery and credential exfiltration vulnerability in the Microsoft Teams webhook endpoint that accepts forged Bot Framework activities with arbitrary serviceUrl values. Attackers can submit a crafted POST request to inject an attacker-controlled serviceUrl that is persisted and used for all subsequent bot replies, causing the server to send live Microsoft OAuth access tokens in Authorization headers to the attacker's host and enabling blind internal network access. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34469 | 1 Cowrie | 1 Cowrie | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Cowrie versions prior to 2.9.0 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the emulated shell implementation of wget and curl. In the default emulated shell configuration, these command emulations perform real outbound HTTP requests to attacker-supplied destinations. Because no outbound request rate limiting was enforced, unauthenticated remote attackers could repeatedly invoke these commands to generate unbounded HTTP traffic toward arbitrary third-party targets, allowing the Cowrie honeypot to be abused as a denial-of-service amplification node and masking the attacker’s true source address behind the honeypot’s IP. | |||||
| CVE-2021-47776 | 1 Umbraco | 1 Umbraco Cms | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Umbraco CMS v8.14.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate baseUrl parameters in multiple dashboard and help controller endpoints. Attackers can craft malicious requests to the GetContextHelpForPage, GetRemoteDashboardContent, and GetRemoteDashboardCss endpoints to trigger unauthorized server-side requests to external hosts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36851 | 2026-10-08 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rob--W cors-anywhere instances configured as an open proxy allow unauthenticated external users to induce the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary targets (SSRF). Because the proxy forwards requests and headers, an attacker can reach internal-only endpoints and link-local metadata services, retrieve instance role credentials or other sensitive metadata, and interact with internal APIs and services that are not intended to be internet-facing. The vulnerability is exploitable by sending crafted requests to the proxy with the target resource encoded in the URL; many cors-anywhere deployments forward arbitrary methods and headers (including PUT), which can permit exploitation of IMDSv2 workflows as well as access to internal management APIs. Successful exploitation can result in theft of cloud credentials, unauthorized access to internal services, remote code execution or privilege escalation (depending on reachable backends), data exfiltration, and full compromise of cloud resources. Mitigation includes: restricting the proxy to trusted origins or authentication, whitelisting allowed target hosts, preventing access to link-local and internal IP ranges, removing support for unsafe HTTP methods/headers, enabling cloud provider mitigations, and deploying network-level protections. | |||||
| CVE-2026-70605 | 1 Electronjs | 1 Electron | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3, when following HTTP redirects, net.fetch() and net.request() did not restrict which schemes a redirect could target. A remote server could redirect a request to a local resource, and if the app returns or forwards the response body, local file contents could be disclosed. Apps are only affected if they make net requests to attacker-influenced URLs with redirects followed and expose the response body. This issue is fixed in versions 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102105 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102104 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102103 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102102 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102095 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102091 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Kiteworks Secure Data Forms before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to make the server issue arbitrary outbound network requests and read back the responses. This could potentially be used to reach internal-only services or other network-restricted resources. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61784 | 1 Hiyouga | 1 Llama-factory | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| LLaMA-Factory is a tuning library for large language models. Prior to version 0.9.4, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the chat API allows any authenticated user to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal and external networks. This can lead to the exposure of sensitive internal services, reconnaissance of the internal network, or interaction with third-party services. The same mechanism also allows for a Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability, enabling users to read arbitrary files from the server's filesystem. The vulnerability exists in the `_process_request` function within `src/llamafactory/api/chat.py.` This function is responsible for processing incoming multimodal content, including images, videos, and audio provided via URLs. The function checks if the provided URL is a base64 data URI or a local file path (`os.path.isfile`). If neither is true, it falls back to treating the URL as a web URI and makes a direct HTTP GET request using `requests.get(url, stream=True).raw` without any validation or sanitization of the URL. Version 0.9.4 fixes the underlying issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31993 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Unica Centralized Offer Management | 2026-10-08 | N/A | 3.5 LOW |
| HCL Unica Centralized Offer Management is vulnerable to a potential Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An attacker can exploit improper input validation by submitting maliciously crafted input to a target application running on a server. | |||||