Total
4032 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-109603 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 3.3 LOW | ||
| Frappe Framework 15.x before 15.107.3 and 16.x before 16.17.0 relies on a vulnerable pdfkit library (CVE-2025-26240) for PDF generation, enabling server-side request forgery and local file inclusion. Authenticated attackers can supply crafted content to PDF rendering to make the server fetch internal resources or embed local server files in generated PDFs. | |||||
| CVE-2026-108770 | 2026-10-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component. | |||||
| CVE-2026-108523 | 2026-10-13 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was determined in Studio-Saelix Sencho up to 0.94.1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file outboundTarget.ts of the component git-sources Browse API Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument repo_url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The presence of this vulnerability remains uncertain at this time. This patch is called 79b86ddcd4aefdd6941f098e35990ab397b13c72. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. The vendor explains: "Git repository access is an intentional, privileged administrative function. Sencho explicitly supports repositories hosted on private LAN, VPC, VPN, CGNAT, and IPv6 ULA networks. The report does not demonstrate a privilege-boundary bypass or access by an unprivileged user. We therefore dispute the CVE characterization of this behavior. As defense in depth, we have nevertheless hardened repository access. Git HTTPS and SSH connections now validate and pin DNS resolution, reject loopback, link-local, multicast, selected special-use and metadata targets, disable redirects and inherited proxy routing, and retain strict SSH host-key verification." | |||||
| CVE-2026-108939 | 2026-10-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in EricLBuehler mistral.rs up to 0.9.3. Impacted is the function is_global_ip of the file mistralrs-server-core/src/media_source.rs. Such manipulation of the argument ip leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 0.9.4 is recommended to address this issue. The name of the patch is cfb8c6a0c42361dc4579a9110b54d339c255b9fd. The affected component should be upgraded. | |||||
| CVE-2026-109189 | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was detected in fit2cloud MeterSphere up to 3.6.9-lts. The affected element is the function Swagger3ParserApiDefinition.testUrlTimeout of the file backend/parser/api/dataimport/Swagger3ParserApiDefinition.java of the component Swagger3 Parser. Performing a manipulation of the argument swaggerUrl results in server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-109404 | 2026-10-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was identified in conductor-oss conductor up to 3.33.0-rc10. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file AgentController.java of the component Agentspan Agent Runtime. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. | |||||
| CVE-2026-27350 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Builderius.io Builderius allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Builderius: from 1.4 through 1.4-beta. | |||||
| CVE-2026-62030 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in StreamCast <= 2.4.5 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-102138 | 1 Accellion | 1 Kiteworks | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| An authenticated administrator on a node with an optional, separately licensed gateway role enabled could supply a connector URL that the server retrieved without sufficient validation of its scheme or destination, causing the server to issue requests to internal network services. Exploitation requires the licensed gateway role to be active. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34452 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Streama versions 1.10.0 through 1.10.5 and prior to commit b7c8767 contain a combination of path traversal and server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in that allow an authenticated attacker to write arbitrary files to the server filesystem. The issue exists in the subtitle download functionality, where user-controlled parameters are used to fetch remote content and construct file paths without proper validation. By supplying a crafted subtitle download URL and a path traversal sequence in the file name, an attacker can write files to arbitrary locations on the server, potentially leading to remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2025-68477 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.7.0, Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127[.]0[.]0[.]1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169[.]254[.]169[.]254), and it returns the response body as the result. Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks. Version 1.7.0 contains a patch for this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-45869 | 2026-10-13 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH | ||
| LogicalDOC Enterprise Version up to and before v9.1.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the ShareFileCallback servlet by manipulating input parameters to trigger a server-side request to an attacker-controlled host. | |||||
| CVE-2025-69014 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Youzify Youzify youzify allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Youzify: from n/a through <= 1.3.7. | |||||
| CVE-2026-77310 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. Prior to versions 2.18.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.1, 3.1.5, and 3.2.1 on their respective release lines, the java.net.InetAddress branch of FromStringDeserializer.Std._deserialize() calls InetAddress.getByName() on attacker-controlled input, causing eager DNS resolution during deserialization and enabling DNS-based server-side request forgery and internal-host enumeration. This issue is fixed in versions 2.18.9, 2.21.5, 2.22.1, 3.1.5, and 3.2.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78682 | 1 Nltk | 1 Nltk | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| NLTK before 3.10.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (and callers nltk.data.load, nltk.downloader.Downloader.index/download) when an HTTP proxy is configured. pathsec.urlopen validates the requested hostname locally, but proxy-handler inheritance disables the safe HTTP/HTTPS handlers so the actual fetch is performed by the proxy against a destination that is never re-validated. An attacker can supply a validated public URL that the proxy forwards to an internal loopback-only service, allowing disclosure of internal HTTP resources, loading of forged downloader indexes, and installation of attacker-chosen package content. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78003 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The Mailgun for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via path traversal in versions up to and including 2.2.0. This is due to insufficient input validation in the add_list() function, which accepts user-controlled array keys from $_POST['addresses'], passes them through sanitize_text_field(). This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make authenticated POST requests to any Mailgun API endpoint using the WordPress site's API key, including creating inbound email-forwarding routes that can intercept password reset emails, leading to administrator account takeover. | |||||
| CVE-2026-47735 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Arc is an open, SQL-native time-series database for telemetry. Prior to version 26.06.1, Arc's user-SQL validator (`internal/api/query.go:ValidateSQLRequest`) blocked only `read_parquet(` and `arc_partition_agg(` via regex denylist. The broader DuckDB I/O function family — `read_csv_auto`, `read_csv`, `read_json`, `read_json_auto`, `read_text`, `read_blob`, `glob`, `parquet_metadata`, `parquet_schema`, `read_xlsx`, etc. — was not blocked. RBAC table-reference extraction inspected only `FROM`/`JOIN` clauses, so scalar table functions in the `SELECT` list slipped past both layers. This is fixed in 2026.06.1 via a structural sandbox at the DuckDB layer. After lockdown, DuckDB refuses to open any file outside the allowlist and refuses further `INSTALL`/`LOAD`. Already-loaded extensions remain callable. Some workarounds are available. Restrict API access to known-trusted networks via firewall rules or, as a temporary mitigation, add `read_csv*`/`read_json*`/`glob` etc. to `dangerousSQLPattern` in `internal/api/query.go`. | |||||
| CVE-2026-78061 | 2026-10-12 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was determined in vas3k TaxHacker up to 0.8.2. Impacted is the function buildImapConfig of the file lib/email-sync/imap-client.ts of the component Email Sync. Executing a manipulation of the argument host/port can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance. | |||||
| CVE-2026-53509 | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM | ||
| CKAN MCP Server is a tool for querying CKAN open data portals. A known vulnerability CVE-2026-33060 indicated tools including ckan_package_search and sparql_query that accept a base_url parameter had the risk of making HTTP requests to arbitrary endpoints without restriction. A fix was applied to filter out ip addresses. However, a method to bypass exists prior to version 0.4.106. CKAN MCP Server validates caller-supplied CKAN server URLs by inspecting only the parsed hostname string before issuing outbound HTTP requests. In `src/utils/http.ts`, hostname aliases such as `ip6-localhost` are not equal to `localhost`, are not dotted IPv4 literals, and are not bracketed IPv6 literals, so they pass the SSRF filter but can resolve to loopback when the server performs the request. A remote MCP caller that can invoke CKAN tools with a `server_url` can therefore make the server connect to local or private addresses and, for CKAN-shaped responses, receive response-derived data. The updated fix in version 0.4.106 replaced the single `hostname === 'localhost'` check with a blocked-hostname `Set` covering `ip6-localhost` and `ip6-loopback`. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54087 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2026-10-12 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| CVE-2025-54087 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Secure Access prior to version 14.10. Attackers with administrative privileges can publish a crafted test HTTP request originating from the Secure Access server. The attack complexity is high, there are no attack requirements, and user interaction is required. There is no direct impact to confidentiality, integrity, or availability. There is a low severity subsequent system impact to integrity. | |||||