Total
3548 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-65442 | 2026-07-28 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in FormCraft <= 3.9.15 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-61835 | 1 Monospace | 1 Directus | 2026-07-28 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. Prior to 12.0.0, the SSRF protection on Directus's file-import-from-URL feature can be bypassed using the address 0.0.0.0 because api/src/request/is-denied-ip.ts treats 0.0.0.0 as a keyword for local interfaces but never blocks the literal address itself. On Linux and macOS, connecting to 0.0.0.0 reaches localhost, so an authenticated user with file-upload rights can make the server fetch internal services through the /files/import endpoint and retrieve the response as a downloadable file. This issue is fixed in version 12.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-45709 | 1 Axllent | 1 Mailpit | 2026-07-28 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. The fix for GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j (CVE-2026-23845, "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via HTML Check API"), shipped in mailpit `v1.28.3`, hardened `internal/htmlcheck/css.go::downloadCSSToBytes` with a 5MB size cap, a `text/css` content-type check, login-info stripping in `isValidURL`, and an opt-in `--block-remote-css-and-fonts` config flag — but did not add the IP-filtering dialer that the same codebase already uses on the two sister SSRF endpoints (the proxy handler and link-check). Prior to version 1.30.0, `internal/htmlcheck/css.go::newSafeHTTPClient` is mis-named — it builds an `http.Client` whose `Transport.DialContext` calls `net.Dialer.DialContext` directly with no IP allowlisting. As a result, the SSRF originally reported by Bao Anh Phan still permits the server to dial loopback, private, link-local, and any other reserved/multicast range, provided the target replies with `HTTP/200` and a content-type beginning with `text/css`. With redirect-following (`CheckRedirect` allows redirects to any `isValidURL` URL with no IP filter), an attacker-controlled public site can redirect mailpit's request into the private network without ever appearing in the email's HTML. In the default mailpit deploy (no UI auth, no SMTP auth, port 1025/8025 exposed), this is an unauthenticated, network-reachable SSRF triggered by sending an HTML email and then issuing one HTTP `GET` to `/api/v1/message/{id}/html-check`. Version 1.30.0 contains an updated fix. | |||||
| CVE-2026-17534 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Kimi Code (@moonshot-ai/kimi-code) before 0.27.0 implements FetchURL SSRF hardening as a static hostname and IP-literal denylist in assertSafeFetchTarget, without resolving DNS or re-validating hosts after HTTP redirects. An attacker who can influence a FetchURL call (for example via prompt injection) can supply a crafted public hostname that resolves to loopback or another internal address, or a public URL that redirects to such a target, and thereby reach internal network services that the denylist was intended to block. FetchURL is included in the default auto-approve tool set, so the call does not require interactive user confirmation in manual mode. | |||||
| CVE-2025-15662 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH | ||
| The Printcart Web to Print Product Designer for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.5.3 does not restrict a user-supplied URL before fetching it server-side and does not enforce a valid authorization check, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary local files (including configuration files containing database credentials and secret keys) and to make server-side requests to internal resources. | |||||
| CVE-2026-48013 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 4.1 MEDIUM | ||
| Shopware is an open commerce platform. Prior to 6.6.10.18 and 6.7.10.1, the `/api/_action/media/external-link` endpoint allows authenticated admin users to make server-side HTTP HEAD requests to arbitrary internal IP addresses. While the parallel `uploadFromURL` flow validates target IPs against private/reserved ranges via `FileUrlValidator`, the `linkURL` flow only performs a URL format check (regex for `http://` or `https://` prefix), allowing SSRF to internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints. This issue is fixed in versions 6.6.10.18 and 6.7.10.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-17458 | 2026-07-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was found in mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1. This affects the function clickViaPlaywright of the file src/browser/routes/agent.act.ts of the component Browser Control HTTP API. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65593 | 1 N8n | 1 N8n | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| n8n versions before 1.123.64, 2.29.8, and 2.30.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the dynamic-node-parameters endpoints that lack authorization scopes. Authenticated attackers can supply absolute URLs in routing configuration to override baseURL restrictions and make the n8n server issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal targets when SSRF protection is disabled. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66437 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Feedzy <= 5.2.4 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-59552 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in 3D Flipbook PDF Viewer & Embedder <= 1.4.2 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-65558 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in AffiliateX <= 2.3.5 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-64799 | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Joomla Extension - regularlabs.com - SSRF via remote image downloads in Articles Anywhere and Users Anywhere extensions - Content-controlled image URLs could request private or reserved network services, follow unsafe redirects and save responses without validating that they were images. This could result in SSRF, internal-data access or writing attacker-controlled files into a web-accessible folder. | |||||
| CVE-2026-62418 | 1 Apache | 1 Syncope | 2026-07-27 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Low-privileged authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Syncope via Connectors and Resources check. This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 Through 4.0.6, from 4.1.0-M0 through 4.1.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.7 / 4.1.2, which fix this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-1343 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-07-25 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 allows an attacker to contact internal authentication endpoints which are protected by the Reverse Proxy. | |||||
| CVE-2026-23773 | 2026-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Dell Disk Library for Mainframe, version(s) DLm 8700/2700 contain(s) a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2025-15098 | 2026-07-25 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was determined in YunaiV yudao-cloud up to 2025.11. This affects the function BpmHttpCallbackTrigger/BpmSyncHttpRequestTrigger of the component Business Process Management. Executing manipulation of the argument url/header/body can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46945 | 1 Qd-today | 1 Qd | 2026-07-25 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| QD 20230821 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted request | |||||
| CVE-2026-31017 | 1 Frappe | 2 Erpnext, Frappe | 2026-07-25 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Print Format functionality of ERPNext v16.0.1 and Frappe Framework v16.1.1, where user-supplied HTML is insufficiently sanitized before being rendered into PDF. When generating PDFs from user-controlled HTML content, the application allows the inclusion of HTML elements such as <iframe> that reference external resources. The PDF rendering engine automatically fetches these resources on the server side. An attacker can abuse this behavior to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services, including cloud metadata endpoints, potentially leading to sensitive information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33458 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) in Kibana One Workflow can lead to information disclosure. An authenticated user with workflow creation and execution privileges can bypass host allowlist restrictions in the Workflows Execution Engine, potentially exposing sensitive internal endpoints and data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33715 | 1 Chamilo | 1 Chamilo Lms | 2026-07-24 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Chamilo LMS is an open-source learning management system. In version 2.0-RC.2, the file public/main/inc/ajax/install.ajax.php is accessible without authentication on fully installed instances because, unlike other AJAX endpoints, it does not include the global.inc.php file that performs authentication and installation-completed checks. Its test_mailer action accepts an arbitrary Symfony Mailer DSN string from POST data and uses it to connect to an attacker-specified SMTP server, enabling Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) into internal networks via the SMTP protocol. An unauthenticated attacker can also abuse this to weaponize the Chamilo server as an open email relay for phishing and spam campaigns, with emails appearing to originate from the server's IP address. Additionally, error responses from failed SMTP connections may disclose information about internal network topology and running services. This issue has been fixed in version 2.0.0-RC.3. | |||||
