Total
922 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-14253 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getIcon method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6016. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14252 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getField method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6015. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14251 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getDataObject method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6014. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14250 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the getAnnot method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6013. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14249 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the exportDataObject method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6012. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14248 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the exportAsXFDF method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6011. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14247 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the exportAsFDF method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6010. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14246 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the convertTocPDF method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6009. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14245 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the closeDoc method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6008. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14244 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the calculateNow method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6007. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14243 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addPageOpenJSMessage method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6006. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14242 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addField method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6005. | |||||
| CVE-2018-14241 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addAnnot method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6004. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11623 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.1049. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the addAdLayer method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a type confusion condition. The attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6003. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10495 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.0.29935. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF documents. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-5586. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8291 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Redhat | 8 Ghostscript, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Artifex Ghostscript through 2017-04-26 allows -dSAFER bypass and remote command execution via .rsdparams type confusion with a "/OutputFile (%pipe%" substring in a crafted .eps document that is an input to the gs program, as exploited in the wild in April 2017. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5116 | 6 Apple, Debian, Google and 3 more | 9 Macos, Debian Linux, Android and 6 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 61.0.3163.79 for Mac, Windows, and Linux, and 61.0.3163.81 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5108 | 5 Apple, Google, Linux and 2 more | 8 Macos, Android, Chrome and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type confusion in PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 60.0.3112.78 for Mac, Windows, Linux, and Android allowed a remote attacker to potentially maliciously modify objects via a crafted PDF file. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5094 | 6 Apple, Debian, Google and 3 more | 9 Macos, Debian Linux, Android and 6 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Type confusion in extensions JavaScript bindings in Google Chrome prior to 60.0.3112.78 for Mac, Windows, Linux, and Android allowed a remote attacker to potentially maliciously modify objects via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5070 | 5 Apple, Google, Linux and 2 more | 8 Macos, Android, Chrome and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. | |||||